I've talked a lot about hatred for Western history, which has been dominant in academia for decades.
But now that "white man bad" is accepted dogma, the second-order effects are... interesting.
1/
After decades of "deconstructing" Western history, the tide has shifted in academic and popular history.
With Europeans disfavored in the historical record, an academic race has begun to "claim" human history.
And India has gone all-in.
With a vacuum in the historiographical narrative, historians from various nations have begun writing screeds against Western history that instead promote their own ethnocentric framings.
That's a heavy sentence, for a simple concept.
"Europeans never did anything important..." was already accepted.
All they're adding is "...it was actually us."
Hoteps have been doing this for Afrocentrism since at least the 1960s, and thus have a head start.
But their scholarship is weak, to say the least.
It gains some acceptance in the "indigenous ways of knowing" sphere, but in the mainstream only gains traction in Facebook groups.
However, India has recently entered the game in force, taking advantage of Western unfamiliarity with Indian history and ethnic self-conception.
Their rhetoric usually centers around being the "oldest and first" in everything, from human evolution to martial arts to science.
If you think this is ridiculous, it's even funnier in practice.
Consider @CKRaju14, an Indian "professor" of history.
His claim to fame is saying that the Greeks didn't invent any geometric concepts... and of course, that Indians did.
Under any close scrutiny, this falls apart (obviously)
Anons have done some excellent work proving just how flimsy this idea is. It relies on mistranslations, omissions, and blatant lies.
The problem with this sort of thing is that Western readers don't really have any sort of insulation against it.
They've been conditioned into ethnic self-hatred, and foreign historians use this expertly to push their own ethnonarcissism - destroying real history in the process.
So, American and European academics platform this ridiculous research, ignoring that it's less rigorous than an average 7th-grade book report.
All an ethnocentric historian has to do is throw out a "white man bad" screed, and anything after will be taken as gospel.
My only question is... who will win the Hotep Arms Race?
Entrenched Afrocentrists saying Yakub invented science, or Indian nationalists claiming all of humanity owes its intelligence to ancient gurus?
Or, can we successfully get rid of this entire farce, and address history as a real thing rather than a vehicle for activism?
Because that's what this is: pure activism.
And historians are allowing ethnocentrists to destroy it as "reparations".
I'd like to see a historiography that doesn't destroy itself out of shame.
Something based in fact and a strong philosophical worldview, that actively uproots the propaganda we've been subjected to for decades.
The “work” debate is mostly people talking past each other, but it’s very clear that old-type “bootstrap” discourse is just done. Sandblasted into nothing each time it encounters reality. The “deal” for young people only gets worse with each passing day.
Doesn’t mean you should just become a NEET, obviously. But I don’t think most of the people arguing on that side are NEETs, or want to be NEETs. It’s just the premise.
The solution for young people is to exploit any advantage they personally have; to seek marginal living/employment situations that break the “rules” in their favor.
Also high-powered careers — “normal life” is broken, so you have to aspire to something else while it’s repaired.
The passive nature of so many young people is the result of a lifetime of this. Every event has been used as a way to further harangue and limit them. Responding to ie violence is out of the question. If you do, the typically helpless authorities suddenly have infinite power.
Kids aren’t dumb — they know who is protected vs who isn’t. It becomes obvious as early as grade school that some groups have free rein and others do not; the incentive/punishment system exists for normal whites and not for others.
Tyler has a Permanent Record. Tyrone does not.
The school system is an earlier and more radical extension of the legal-cultural system by which anarcho-tyranny is implemented, and tells especially young men of ability and spirit that they must Sit And Take It, no matter what It is.
US public schools consistently underpunish nonwhite students and overpunish white students. It’s where people learn the rules of anarcho-tyranny, and has been far longer than this has been the legal status quo.
This isn’t spread via policy or law. Disparate impact suits are usually brought up in this discussion, but all they did was codify the existing state of affairs.
It happens because “educators” — most people, really — are totally mindcaptured by media.
The results: white kids learn that everything they do will be scrutinized to the highest degree. Even outside of school, they are always Watched in some meaningful way. The Permanent Record exists for them and no one else. Racial violence, for example, can only ever go one way.
The main point of this post is pertinent and good — and of course it’s insane that we have to live like this — but I am begging people to drop the “bullying” frame, really the entire word.
What’s happening is not 80s movie shenanigans, it’s racial gang violence.
In the US, the equivalent is white parents talking about “bullying” from black students, which is really not the case. The cultural image of “bullying” is exclusion, mean names, minor/funny harassment. What’s happening is often attempted murder.
By complaining of “bullying” you’re saying that your child is archetypally the weak outsider, mocked by the “popular.” I don’t think this ever reflected reality (some have pointed out that they’re Semitic mythological tropes inserted via Hollywood) — and it certainly doesn’t now.
How people “learned” to fight is a contentious question. In many cases, it’s very tied into ethnic pride. Here’s a rough sketch of my hypothesis.
In short, I think the better question is when people *forgot* how to fight.
1/
There are many competing claims to being the “originator” of martial arts.
We’re going to define the term as systematized methods of fighting, whether unarmed or with weapons, but particularly hand-to-hand — i.e. archery or atlatl throwing is not a “martial art.”
Martial arts are also a distinctly… well, martial endeavor. They are undertaken exclusively among men, for the purpose of more effectively killing a resisting opponent in battle or single combat.
This includes combat with weapons, open-hand striking, and of course grappling.
This is ripped from David Foster Wallace’s “This is Water.” I know this because a middle school teacher made us watch it on repeat and do (many) assignments on it. Even as a kid, I found it juvenile and stupid. 150 years ago, students at that age would have been reading Latin.
When people brag about their “success” in K-12, it betrays a lack of depth. Basically, that they were good at repeating these kinds of platitudes, and getting pats on the head about it felt like a great achievement.
American public education isn’t really “hard,” in that the material is high-level and fast. A lot of it is embarrassingly flat — mediocre teachers doing Dead Poets Society or Stand and Deliver LARP. Anyone smart realizes this young.