I wonder if Jack Smith reads Jack Smith's motions in Jack Smith's cases:
On left, Jack Smith told DC judge CIPA procedures--relates to handling of classified docs--shouldn't delay Trump's J6 trial.
On right, Jack Smith told FLA judge in Trump's classified docs case it does:
ONE DAY after scoffing at Trump's motion to delay trial, citing onerous obligations under CIPA, Smith files a motion seeking a CIPA officer and other procedures--possibly a SCIF like Mar-a-Lago case?--to slow roll process.
Smith has no intention of going to trial in December
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The only reason DOJ then Jack Smith conducted classified docs investigation in DC rather than proper venue of FLA was to get favorable rulings by Obama Judge Beryl Howell--which they did.
Not a single defendant lived in DC. Not a single crime alleged to have happened in DC.
Dates of alleged crimes in 1st indictment all come after Trump left Washington.
Which is why, at the last minute, Smith realized he had a jurisdiction problem. So he took all the evidence collected by Dem grand jury in Obama-appointee run DC courthouse and reportedly read summaries of the grand jury proceedings to a FLA grand jury to get the indictment.
Does that sound legit? No. If Smith was properly using the grand jury in DC, why not indict there?
Is it possible a GJ and judge in FLA would have approved a warrant to seize months of security footage from inside the home of a former president to see who moved some f*cking boxes?
Beryl Howell, former chief judge of DC District court (her term of destruction ended in March), is the tumor of the malignancy that festers in Washington.
She is notorious for sealed orders and sealed hearings.
Democratic Senate staffer turned Obama appointed federal judge turned chief judge who also aided Robert Mueller witch hunt still butthurt Trump wasn't charged.
Appeal on behalf of Barry Croft, convicted during DOJ retrial of case after Croft received a hung jury, filed today. (Adam Fox, his co-defendant, filed his appeal this morning.)
Croft's lawyer minces no words:
Similar to Fox's appeal, Croft cites judicial misconduct as key reason for new hearing. Judge Jonker (GWB appointee) refused to allow jury in both trials to see hundreds of texts btw numerous FBI assets.
"Chappel" is lead FBI informant Dan Chappel. "Chambers" is Jayson Chambers, his FBI handler.
FBI offered "free" credit cards to Fox and others as part of the scheme. Despite Fox living in cellar of vacuum repair shop--no toilet or running water--he declined the cards repeatedly.
"Robeson" is Steve Robeson, convicted felon and longtime FBI informant.
BREAKING: With a few minutes to spare, Trump responds to Jack Smith "protective order" in January 6 case:
Trump's lawyers address 1A issues, DOJ non-cooperation, judge's rushed deadline. They also take a swipe at Biden's own social media account for a post on day of Trump's arraignment:
Trump's lawyers call proposed order what it is:
a gag order
NEW: On Thursday, a federal judge ordered compassionate release of 3 members of the so-called Newburgh Four. In a 28-page ruling, Judge McMahon blasts FBI for its "made for TV movie" to entrap the men using a criminal informant.
Another Robert Mueller specialty...
So much of this reeks of Whitmer fednapping hoax.
Used shady informant (several in Whitmer) to entrap men, promised them money, offered friendship/father figure, handle FBI-produced explosives then drove them to arrest site (SAME AS WHITMER) all to promote "terrorism" threat:
What is truly sickening is the longtime FBI informant in this case (and others) owned a limo company responsible for a horrific crash that killed 20 people.
"The FBI enabled Shahed Hussain to feel that he could get away with anything."
I know you’ll be SHOCKED to learn none of these headlines are true. (Just a handful of dozens of false headlines)
Smith’s allegation is laughably weak—hearsay at best—with a brief paragraph of an alleged exchange btw 2 Trump employees. Trump’s name isn’t specifically mentioned…
For those with apparent reading disabilities (my lovely bot followers) I’ve gone to great lengths to highlight the incriminating evidence buried in Jack Smith’s new indictment.
This is the so-called “conspiracy” to delete video.
So what happened to the security tapes? Well…
In response to yet another subpoena (out of DC not FLA), Trump turned over security footage from Jan 2022-June 2022—an archive equally 3 years of footage. This is from court hearing last week: