Liverpool had the chance to address ALL of their urgent squad needs this summer for a net spend of £160m-180m. So far, they’ve failed miserably.
A short breakdown 🧵
Last season was Liverpool’s most deflating and disappointing season under Jürgen Klopp. It’s clear that a proper rebuild was needed & that there was not enough turnover & refreshing of the squad in the summers prior.
This summer, the agenda was clear:
Trim the squad of deadwood; bring in young, fresh, energetic and hungry players, and establish a new feeling around the club.
A feeling of ambition, of new desire, and of excitement, to be a part of Klopp’s Liverpool 2.0.
Prior to the summer, Liverpool’s squad still had several world-class talents, all over the pitch, to build around. Alisson, Trent, Konaté, VVD & Salah is a fantastic core.
Jones is excellent, too & Liverpool’s attacking depth (Diaz, Gakpo, etc) is one of the best in the league.
But it was apparent that the squad needed at least five additions in key areas, namely:
— RCB back-up
— LCB/LB hybrid to compete with Robertson
— A new starting DM
— A new starting RCM
— LCM competition with Jones
Liverpool identified two of their needs quickly & brought in Mac Allister and Szoboszlai - two astute additions which improve the squad significantly.
Szo at RCM, Mac Allister at LCM.
But in the now 54 days (!!!) since announcing their second signing, Szoboszlai, Liverpool have failed to address any of their other needs, with Endo not being good enough to be a starter for a team that should aim to compete for the PL.
This is shameful, particularly when there were fitting options available on the market.
Liverpool could have addressed all of their needs for a net spend of maximum £180m, probably less.
— RCB: Tosin Adarabioyo
— LCB/LB: Gvardiol/Inacio/Lukeba/Theate
— DM: Rice/Caicedo/Lavia/Doucouré
— RCM: Szoboszlai
— LCM: Mac Allister
It was unlikely from the start that Liverpool would sign any of Gvardiol, Rice or Caicedo given the money involved and the players’ preferences, but given their stand-out profiles, these should have been identified as targets & inquired about, before moving on to Tier 2 talents.
Looking at it more realistically, Liverpool could’ve had this summer, if they moved early & with clarity.
Total spend: £220-250m when considering slight deviations.
Offset by player sales:
— Fabinho: £40m
— Henderson: £10m
And Matip and Tsimikas should have been shown the door this summer, if Liverpool’s management team was capable of acting with more ruthlessness and clarity.
Being realistic here:
— Matip: £5m
— Tsimikas: £10m
Total raised in sales: ~£65m
Not to mention the wages freed up by several free departures including Firmino, Keita, Milner & Ox.
Total spend: ~£240m
Total received: ~£65m
Net spend: ~£175m
Yes, a lot of money for Liverpool, but necessary and reasonable given 1) the lack of spending in the last 4-5 years, 2) the size & revenue of LFC, 3) the desperate need to refresh the squad, 4) the fact that this squad would be PL title contenders, with proper coaching & tactics.
This summer it has appeared as though Liverpool’s recruitment team lacked clarity in their vision. Some needs were identified & addressed, while others were not.
Liverpool were not ruthless. Adrian (takes away home-grown spot), Matip & Tsimikas are still there.
Not all of Liverpool’s needs were identified & even when they did identify them (DM), they acted strangely, unsure of their primary target (Caicedo, Lavia, Endo), causing them to miss out & scramble.
All of this when Liverpool could’ve assembled a squad capable of challenging for the title for a realistic net spend of £160-175m.
Instead, for at least the third summer in a row, Liverpool look likely to sell themselves short, when only one or two more key additions are needed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Stefan Bajčetić possesses all the necessary tools to become a top player in a position where Liverpool’s squad is most dire.
To a large extent, whether he will reach his potential is dependent on his body.
Thread!
Bajčetić’s profile is a highly intriguing one. At age 18, he’s already an excellent dueler, tackler, and ball winner at PL level, while showing glimpses of top press resistance, agility, game intelligence, composure, versatility, ball-striking and a solid passing range.
He stood out for his good performances in a highly dysfunctional Liverpool team, before picking up a “stress response” injury in his adductor – most likely caused by the vast increase in his playing time & intensity.
Indeed, his development is largely dependent on his body.
Messi not returning to Barcelona hurts massively on a romantic level, but not at a sporting one.
In fact, it may be best for both parties that Messi leaves European football at this time.
(Short thread)
Everyone with a football heart wanted Messi to return to Barcelona. His last stint in Europe being with PSG simply doesn’t feel right. But when considering Barça’s current tactics, playstyle/intent & finances, it may be for the best that Messi goes elsewhere.
Barça have a very young squad filled with players who are still developing and mastering their game. They have also managed just last season to get back to a highly competitive sporting level in the post-Bartomeu, post-Messi era - no easy feat.
Liverpool’s recent defensive woes analysed. Is the 3-2-2-3 to blame?
Klopp’s side has now played six games in their new system and conceded 10 goals – far too many for a team of their quality.
What is causing this? Is the system at fault?
Tactical analysis thread!
Since moving to the new 3-2-2-3 system, Liverpool are shipping 1.67 goals per game, which, despite the small sample size, is a worrying trend that warrants analysis.
I’ve seen multiple people on this platform complain that...
Liverpool’s formation change is responsible for the poor defensive record.
I strongly disagree with this. In fact, I believe the Reds’ rest defence is now much improved & that the team will see better defensive results in the long run.
Having played four games in a new system, the Reds look revitalized. But what exactly has changed and how has it made Liverpool better? And what can still be improved?
Tactical Analysis Thread!
Over the years, Klopp’s Liverpool have become synonymous with the 4-3-3; specifically, a 4-3-3 with two attacking full backs, a system with which they won all of the biggest titles available to them.
But times change and football evolves.
Nowadays, the best teams in England and indeed the world, no longer play with two attacking full backs. In fact, Arsenal and Man City, the arguably two most tactically astute teams in Europe, most often keep both of their full backs back – also in a 3-2-2-3 shape.