The Hill is out with my response to the Washington Post attacking me for saying that the Georgia call is not evidence of a crime. While I continue to disagree with Trump's claims in the call, it was widely misrepresented by the Post and other papers... thehill.com/opinion/crimin…
...Critics have stated the obvious. There was a prior recount and no systemic fraud was found. I criticized Trump's claims but that does not make this call a criminal matter. The transcript shows Trump making the case for another recount or investigation...
...Trump was clearly referring to his objective in finding votes and the threshold he needed to meet. That is a predictable argument for a candidate in pushing for a continued investigation. One can disagree with those claims (as I did) without believing that the call is a criminal matter...
...There is also an irony to Phillip Bump's column on why Trump should be prosecuted for spreading lies. Bump has repeatedly spread false stories and then refused to accept the falsity of his own earlier claims, even after others admitted the errors. jonathanturley.org/2023/05/18/wai…
...Despite my disagreement with Trump on these claims and my support for the decisions of the Georgia officials, there is a danger to the criminalization of such claims in election challenges. I fail to see a limiting principle in these arguments.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hillary Clinton is now speaking in Berlin. It has been a love fest for the Clintons. Clinton started by trashing “the government I the United States” as now supporting “autocrats”…
…Clinton immediately turned to the need to control information which “controls what we think.” She insisted that there must be a protection for “facts” : a chilling message from one of the most outspoken champions for censorship and speech regulations.
…Clinton is the perfect personification of the goal to crate “A New World Order: Based on European Values”. It is American values that are a bit more of a challenge for a leader who called on the EU to use the Digital Services Act to censor Americans.
I am in Berlin to speak at the World Forum. I am currently listening to the opening session at a conference pointedly named recently as “A New World Order: European Values”…
Bill and Hillary Clinton were just celebrated as leadership “truly made America great again.” When it comes to free speech, the Clintons certainly represent “European Values” on free speech…
…After Elon Musk bought Twitter and dismantled most of the company’s censorship program, Hillary Clinton turned to Europe and called upon them to use their Digital Services Act to force censorship against Americans…
Many are suggesting that the Biden pardons may now be challenged in light of the disclosures of Biden's use of an autopen.The chances of such challenges succeeding are vanishingly low. Presidents are allowed to use the autopen and courts will not presume a dead-hand conspiracy...
...Many of these were high-profile pardons, including for his own son, that Biden acknowledged publicly. There is also a problem with standing unless the issue comes up in a government effort to indict a recipient. That does not mean that the disclosures are not deeply troubling.
...The account of Speaker Johnson on how Biden seemed unaware of signing a major piece of legislation does suggest the use of a dead-hand power by staffers. In the end, this is the most difficult type of allegation to pursue since the key parties will be unified in claiming full knowledge and approval by the president...
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer declared that Mahmoud Khalil should be released "if the administration cannot prove he has violated any criminal law." He is mistaken on the standard...facebook.com/senschumer/pos…
...We still do not know what the evidence against Khalil will show on any nexus to Hamas or the Columbia occupation. However, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(4)(C) does not require a criminal act. The standard only requires the Sec. Rubio find "reasonable ground to believe" that he could present a "potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable"...
...That is a generous standard that invites a heavy degree of deference from the courts. If Khalil helped organize the occupation that led to property damage, it is conduct that could satisfy the standard. Once again, there are clearly weighty free speech issues in such cases...
Rep. Ro Khanna (D., Cal.) gave Shannon Bream one of the most convoluted and conflicted explanations for voting against the Green censure because "he did not engage in violence . . . and I ultimately a supporter of free speech. . . and he had a free speech right."...
...Is that now the standard? You can disrupt joint sessions so long as you do not physically assault the president or others. That would be a crime that is already covered by the criminal code. Censure is about ethical conduct...
...The suggestion that Green had a protected "right of free speech" is ridiculous. Just as the deplatforming speakers in higher education is not protected, it is certainly not a right on the house floor. Green has an unfettered right outside of session...jonathanturley.org/2025/03/07/we-…
Green was censured, but only 9 Democrats joined in the motion. The Democrats then refused to clear the well and disrupted Speaker Johnson's efforts to complete the censure process. The sound you heard was the Democratic party hitting rock bottom in this disgraceful display...
Faced with the first member to be expelled during a joint session address, the Democrats followed a censure over his disruption by disrupting the business of the House. Johnson showed admirable restraint and put the house into recess...
...With this vote and the subsequent protest in the well, the party has cut itself adrift from any principle of decorum or civility. It turns out that only 8 Democrats voted for the motion. Two voted present. Green said he would do it again and the rest of the party supported him