1/ Beware - A lot of uneducated and misinformed (at best) garbage being disseminated by those who do not want others to wear masks to reduce their inhalation exposure to virus-laden respiratory aerosol particles.
2/ Masks do not act like sieves with openings too big to capture some particles or small enough to capture others. Filtration mechanisms are more complex than this and have been well defined on this medium many, many times in the past by those educated on the topic.
3/ This is a good not-too-technical summary for those inclined to want to understand the filtration mechanisms of gravitational settling, impaction, interception, Brownian motion (sometimes referred to as diffusion), and electrostatic attraction. airpophealth.com/blogs/air-reso…
4/ There is always a minimum capture efficiency (often between 0.2 and 0.4 um), where there is a penetration (get through filter) sweet spot with respect to the mechanisms defined above. Particles with smaller diameters are more effectively filtered due to Brownian motion..
5/ The filtration efficiency increases above the diameter of minimum efficiency because of increased combination of interception, impaction, and gravitational settling (for larger aerosol particles).
6/ Another bit of misinformation relates to the size of viruses somehow affecting filtration. Viable SARS-CoV-2 or other airborne infectious viruses do not leave the human respiratory system as a naked virus.
7/ Viruses leave the respiratory system embedded in respiratory aerosol particles (their effective ride share into room air.
8/ These respiratory aerosol particles (RAPs) are generated by mechanical actions from the deep lungs to mouth. For those who actually want to learn more about RAP generation, this is a good paper and Figure 1 provides an excellent summary - nature.com/articles/s4225…
9/ Respiratory aerosol particles in which viruses are embedded contain salts and proteins associated with mucous, etc., span a wide range of diameters and shrink to some extent when leaving the human body as the water phase of the aerosol evaporates.
10/ Note that a a 2 micron diameter particle has a volume that is approximately 5,000 times that of a SARS-CoV-2 virus.
11/ What's important is not trying to filter a virus with a 0.12 micron effective diameter, but rather the RAPs that the virus is embedded in & that have a spectrum of larger diameters (if they are conveying the virus).
12/ A well-fit N95 respiratory will remove well over 95% of the respiratory aerosol particles that convey the SARS-CoV-2 or other airborne infectious viruses through air. This will provide a HUGE reduction in inhalation exposure and huge reduction in probability of infection.
13/ I hope this helps folks who care about reducing their chances of getting COVID-19 and who are confused by those intentionally or unintentionally providing misinformation about masks, filtration of viruses in masks, etc. We are in a surge, folks. Be smart and stay safe..
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Thanks for the excellent reporting, @apoorva_nyc. It is so disappointing that so much of the available funds have been wasted on relatively ineffective technologies or not used at all.
2/ As stated in the article, it is possible to address airborne infectious agents, e.g., that cause COVID-19 and influenza, as well as other pollutants that improve student and teacher health, productivity, and (thus) effective education for students.
3/ In the article my good friend Mark Hernandez states that we can improve indoor air quality for approximately $65/student/per year. That cost would be top end, presumably major renovations to HVAC systems, large increases in fresh air exchange & associated energy costs, etc.
1/ Done looking at data for last few days and on-off experiments for today. Effectiveness = fractional reduction of PM2.5 with CR-Box on vs. before switched on (no control). With CR-Box on highest flow the effectiveness is greater than 0.98 (PM2.5 drops to < 2% of initial).
2/ In terms of background aerosol concentrations in shared air, that's like wearing an N95 mask.
On lowest flow the effectiveness is 0.79 (PM2.5 concentration drops to 21% of pre-control level. Still not bad!
3/ We normally keep the system on mid-flow (experimental design) and it activates at 8 a.m. and switches off at 5 p.m. each day. Looking back at the past few days it appears that on mid-flow we push or exceed a 90% reduction.
We are doing long-term measurements of CR Box performance in a number of real occupied environments @ucdavis, with intermittent (every 2 months) take-down and detailed lab analysis. Here are results for one office suite.
2/ The CR box is programmed to switch on at medium setting at 8 a.m. each morning and switch back off at 5 p.m. On occasion it gets switched off and back on during the occupied day to ascertain response. The plot above shows 10-min averaged PM2.5 concentrations.
3/ 1 = previous occupied day end and response when CR Box switches off; 2 = CR box activation at 8 a.m. on July 20th; 3 = CR box intentionally switched off at approx 2 p.m.; 4 =CR box switched back on at high flow setting at approx 4 p.m.; 5 = CR Box switched off at 5 p.m.
NG stoves is a hot issue. There is abundant & increasing literature related to NOx emissions, & impacts on health & climate change associated w/ natural gas combustion. This thread focuses only on particle emissions from gas stoves.
2/ Cooking with natural gas, including stove burners and ovens, leads to emissions of ultrafine particles (UFP).
3/ Fuel type (methane, natural gas, odorant-free natural gas), level of primary aeration, mixture flow rate, and fuel sulfur content are factors that can impact the amount and nature of particle emissions.
1/ #Incense Burning
Incense use in the US is increasing. In 2018, the US incense market size was $128 M USD & is forecast to reach $281 M by 2025.
2/ Incense comes in various forms - sticks (common in the US), Joss sticks, cones, coils, rope, powders, and smudge. Numerous health impacts of exposure to incense smoke have been reported. For example, ...
3/ Cognitive effects, particularly on older adults who burn incense, have been observed. The genotoxicity of certain incense smoke condensates in mammalian cells have been observed to be higher than tobacco smoke condensates.
1/ New CDC recommendation on ventilation - as equivalent ACH (eACH). Aim for at least 5 air changes each hour and upgrade to MERV-13 filters. More thoughts below.
2/ It's a good start and should decrease inhalation dose of respiratory aerosol concentrations by between about 20% to 40% in many classrooms (based on my experience w/ typical starting points in schools --some w/ recirculation through MERV-13 filters already achieve 5 eACH).
3/ Importantly, it is NOT difficult to achieve MUCH higher than 5 ACH in classrooms - even approaching 10 equivalent ACH w/ ASHRAE 62.1 ventilation + a #CorsiRosenthalBox, or 6 ACH w/ 62.1 in a typical classroom & a good HEPA air cleaner.