Alexander Profile picture
Aug 27 16 tweets 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Sex differences in reasons for infidelity 🧵:

Men are more likely to cheat when the opportunity is available.

Women are more likely to cheat when unhappy, not attracted to a current partner, and to switch relationships.

link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Image
Consistent with the mate switching hypothesis in this study. An equal number of men and women reported infidelity, but:

Men who do cheat tend to cheat with more partners over time.

Women who cheat tend to do it less frequently. Image
Women are also more likely to tell their partners, consistent with cheating being concurrent with leaving a relationship (potentially for the new partner):
Image
Image
Women's relationships are more likely to end following infidelity and women are more likely to begin a new relationship with the affair partner: Image
Also in this paper: men were more likely to be suspicious and more likely to detect infidelity. Women may not be better at hiding it.

Potentially related to a higher sensitivity to extra-pair paternity from the evolutionary perspective.
Similar in another paper: "men were more likely than women to judge that their partners would commit sexual infidelity in the future."

journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
What makes people less likely to cheat?

Sex differences again: men simply indicate a higher willingness.

But for women, it's especially low when current relationship satisfaction is high.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
"People's deployment of cheating strategy depended on the fitness benefits of their relationship and the potential costs of cheating. People would be more likely to hold back from cheating if they were in a fitness-beneficial relationship and if the costs of doing so were high." Image
Also an interesting paper:

When imagining committing infidelity, both men and women report higher negative emotions than when they recall having actually cheated.

And women report higher negative emotionality than men.

link.springer.com/article/10.100…

Image
Image
General takeaway from this: we see qualitative and quantitative sex differences in infidelity.

There is some question about the "cheating gap" closing. This may be true if you look at "has ever cheated."
If you count the number of infidelities, rather than "had ever cheated," men still do seem to cheat "more."
Why? Higher sociosexuality in men (associated with infidelity), higher sexual pleasure from casual sexual encounters, higher libido, higher rates of antisocial behavior and risk behavior.
Additionally, a drive for novelty and evolved sexual strategies: men benefit more from infidelity from the perspective of reproductive fitness than women do.

True also for serial monogamy:

academic.oup.com/beheco/article…
Individuals can cheat for any reason or no reason at all, but we're speaking of trends between groups here.

For women, infidelity is more closely linked with the end of a relationship (and the beginning of a new relationship with the new partner).
This is why men are more likely to cheat in a happy relationship. They cite relationship dissatisfaction less. Infidelity for men is less likely to be relationship-seeking behavior. It's more likely to be sex-seeking behavior.
Important to understand this, because men often attribute what their own motives or behaviors might be to the motives of women.

For example:

You might imagine cheating because a woman was simply hot and available.

But she cheated because she was done with the relationship.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexander

Alexander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @datepsych

Aug 25
A common narrative is “society told me women/relationships were like X,” but I wonder why fiction, romantic comedies/dramas, and Disney cartoons have been so influential in shaping the mental maps of so many people. 🧵
Fiction has tropes and archetypes. It builds on stereotypes (that may reflect real averages trends). It also reflects the aspirations, dreams, and fantasies of its creators - things that probably don’t happen most of the time, but that they wish would or should.
We live in an environment filled with media, stories, propaganda; movies and songs - whatever, you name it.

These do shape peoples beliefs, so the point isn’t “are you stupid for thinking all these fictional stories were real models of the world.”
Read 21 tweets
Aug 20
Snipping these Tweets for reference. What do they get right and wrong? 🧵

Image
Image
Image
1. Women do use sex to secure long term relationships. We see in some past research, for example, that this strategy may be used more by women of average attractiveness. Earlier sexual investment to secure a mate.
Meanwhile, women of higher physical attractiveness may be able to demand more investment and not need to commit sexually as early in a relationship - withholding for commitment.

However, these women also have access to higher value mates - not the "beta" demographic.
Read 19 tweets
Jul 22
People ask about this a lot - effects of attractiveness on extra-pair sexual behavior and the role of hormones.

A thread and recent paper on this.

Dinh and Gangestad are two of the authors; some of the main researchers of the dual mate hypothesis of ovulatory shifts. 🧵 Image
Women are sexually active across the cycle, but conception is mostly limited to a small window of ovulation:

"The periovulatory phase, the conceptive window encompassing the day of ovulation and the few days prior."
Thus the dual mate hypothesis: sexual preferences and behaviors may change during this window.

"Women’s sexual interests (e.g., for different partners or mate features) differ when conception is possible from when it is not possible (Gangestad, Dinh, Lesko, & Haselton, 2021)."
Read 22 tweets
Jul 21
"Positive illusions" in relationships, or cognitive reframing.

People who view their partner's faults and virtues as an integrated whole are more likely to remain in stable and lasting relationships.

https://t.co/XLjrQibxNptandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.120…
Image
A difference between those in good and bad relationships:

1. In good relationships, they link faults with virtues.

2. In bad relationships, they link faults with other faults.
A study described in this review used cards with words like "stubbornness," "selfishness," "caring" etc. to sort partner virtues and faults.
Read 10 tweets
Jul 20
Men report more sexual partners on average than women. We shouldn't see this if men and women both report accurately. Why does it occur?

1. Men report more extreme values.

2. Women count, men estimate.

3. Sex differences in attitudes toward casual and nonexclusive sex.
Image
Image
Accounting for these variables reduced the discrepancy in reporting by about two-thirds.

Most of that was reduced by the counting vs estimating difference.
You can see that effect in an earlier paper (chart from Morris, text from the paper above). Look at how men report large round numbers:
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jul 9
People internalize expectations for relationships based on ideological beliefs in popular culture about how relationships "should" function.

The expectations may often be at odds with how human psychology actually seems to work. 🧵
Divorce is a good example of this. "But you made a promise; you agreed to a contract."

The most common human mating pattern is serial monogamy. People fall out of love. Relationship satisfaction declines over time (more for women on average), people change, and minds change.
On the flip side you have something like "monogamy is a social construct" and people who think you can, or should, "unlearn" emotions and behavioral patterns that evolved to facilitate pair bonding, such as jealousy and a desire for exclusivity.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(