@Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 3/3. Clark is very confused. In §5 he wrote, “Small changes in LWIR flux in the upper troposphere or stratosphere cannot influence surface temperatures of 288 K. Heat does not flow from a cooler to a warmer body.”
@Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 2/2. It is unclear what you mean by "override any CO2 effect." The plain language interpretation is that "override" means "cancels out," but since temperatures have risen, that obviously didn't happen.
I thought "maybe" it was W&M's typo. But it was your mistake, not theirs.
You told me they'd reported RF from tripling CO2 was 0.5 W/m². They hadn't, but I believed you.
@Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 3/4. I should have carefully read the excerpt you provided, but I didn't. My bad.
But I did find the paper and noticed they'd cited the IPCC's figure of 3.7 W/m² per CO2 doubling. (It's unclear if they knew that's for TOA, rather than surface.)
Those 2 numbers are inconsistent.
@Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 4/4. The inconsistency of those 2 numbers meant there obviously was an error. But it turned out that the error was yours (and mine, for not checking the citation you provided), not theirs.
The Earth's radiative energy imbalance is not measurable with existing technology. However, it can be deduced, approximately, from other things. I built an online spreadsheet to make that easier: sealevel.info/radiative_imba…
No, they don't. You've confused TOTAL radiation from clouds with the small incremental CHANGE in radiation from CO2 due to the anthropogenic increase from ≈280 to ≈420 ppmv.
@Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 3/6. Downwelling LW IR from CO2 & clouds are typically of similar magnitude when it's cloudy, but IR from clouds is intermittent, so IR from CO2 is greater in total effect.
Downwelling IR from clouds is greatest when the clouds are low and warm.
@Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 4/6. Here's a plot of downwelling radiation (in blue) measured at Penn State on a day which was cloudy from about 8:30 PM to 5:00 AM, and then clear. You can see that cloud cover added a variable amount of downwelling IR, up to a maximum of about 75 W/m². sealevel.info/psu_solar_down…
@Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 5/6. For comparison, total downwelling IR from all sources is generally estimated to average about 340 W/m² at the surface, averaged over 24 hours, over the entire Earth.
I don't know what "simultaneously mixed" means. When there're no clouds the Earth's surface receives LW IR only from GHGs. When it's cloudy the Earth's surface receives LW IR both from GHGs and clouds; the fluxes add.
@Mark_A_Lunn @Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 2/5. If you look at drawings of the design of the new Panamax locks, you'll see three levels of large, shallow storage ponds beside them. That's to conserve water.
They installed them because they knew that the water supply was going to be an issue, due to the increased demand.
When you need to lower the water in a lock, instead of just dumping it downstream, you divert the top 1/4 into pond #1 (the highest pond), the next 1/4 into pond #2, and the next 1/4 into pond #3. Only the last 1/4 is lost downstream.
@Mark_A_Lunn @Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 4/5. Then, when you need to raise the water level again in the lock, you add the first 1/4 from pond #3, the next 1/4 from pond #2, the third 1/4 from pond #1, and the final 1/4 from the lake.
It's still all gravity-fed (no pumps)! But now you're using much less water per cycle.
@Mark_A_Lunn @Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 5/5. From the drawings I've seen, only the new Panamax locks have that water-saving system. It seems like they ought to upgrade the older, smaller locks to use the same system. (Or maybe they just don't use the old, less water-efficient locks, when the water supply is tight.)
@Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 3/3. Plus, for most of the 15µm band, the effective emission height is roughly the tropopause, so raising the emission height doesn't result in colder temperatures at the emission height. Only at the fringes, where CO2 absorbs only weakly, is that untrue.
Nonsense. The most important things which damage crops are drought and early frost. Elevated CO2 helps mitigate both of those threats, via slightly lengthened growing seasons & improved WUE.
2/4. Here's what the Institute of Physics said about it:
Excerpt:
"The CRU e-mails as published on the internet provide prima facie evidence of determined and coordinated refusals to comply with honourable scientific traditions and freedom of information law. The principle that scientists should be willing to expose their ideas and results to independent testing and replication by others, which requires the open exchange of data, procedures and materials, is vital. The lack of compliance has been confirmed by the findings of the Information Commissioner. This extends well beyond the CRU itself most of the e-mails were exchanged with researchers in a number of other international institutions who are also involved in the formulation of the IPCC's conclusions on climate change."publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cm…
@OliverCramon @Willard1951 @priscian @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ScienceBlog3 @DawnTJ90 @Beto_In_Austin @aaronshem @Kenneth72712993 @InspirallPE @ammocrypta @Mark_A_Lunn @RichardLWeiss @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @BenKoby1911 @Data79504085 @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @emilio97493490 @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph 3/4. I have a web page about it, with links to many additional resources: sealevel.info/climategate.ht…
@OliverCramon @Willard1951 @priscian @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ScienceBlog3 @DawnTJ90 @Beto_In_Austin @aaronshem @Kenneth72712993 @InspirallPE @ammocrypta @Mark_A_Lunn @RichardLWeiss @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @BenKoby1911 @Data79504085 @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @emilio97493490 @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph 4/4. I also have the full collection of Climategate emails and other files, here: sealevel.info/FOIA/
@OliverCramon @emilio97493490 @Anvndarnamn5 @priscian @Willard1951 @Michael_D_Crow @ScienceBlog3 @DawnTJ90 @Beto_In_Austin @aaronshem @Kenneth72712993 @InspirallPE @ammocrypta @Mark_A_Lunn @RichardLWeiss @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @BenKoby1911 @Data79504085 @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph 2/4. Human CO2 emissions are entirely responsible for rising CO2 levels, and elevated CO2 is highly beneficial for plants, both for agriculture and natural ecosystems.
3/4. Some aspects of climate change have nothing to do with human activity. The repeated glaciation/deglaciation cycles over the last million years were REAL climate change, but they were not caused by anything that humans did. In fact, during some of them there were no humans.
4/4. The evidence is compelling that manmade climate change is modest and benign, and CO2 emissions are highly beneficial, rather than harmful.
Does that surprise you? If so, you're not getting balanced information. But I'm here to help:
That webpage has:
● accurate introductory climatology info
● in-depth science from BOTH skeptics & alarmists
● links to balanced debates between experts on BOTH sides
● info about climate impacts
● links to the best blogs on BOTH sidessealevel.info/learnmore.html
@Mark_A_Lunn @ZombiePiano @ClimateRetorts @RobAnderson17 @Anvndarnamn5 @S_D_Mannix @ammocrypta @wille99 @ItsTheAtmospher @Dcchristense @benmooreau @KCTaz @Climatehope2 @EthonRaptor @TWTThisIsNow @TheDisproof @B_Bolshevik100 @Data79504085 @Veritatem2021 @Jaisans @atherton_chris @WillWat6 @3GHtweets @DGinCheshire @BointonGiles @AuroriaTwittori @RushhourP @MartinJBern @Willard1951 @AristotleMrs @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 @DTGvmd @PaulDFarrar @Hji45519156 @Valja46Zhark5 @paulp1232 @ShroedingerBird @J0aquIm_B4rb0s4 @Sky48115666 @0Sundance @BradPKeyes @DoesThisW0rk @FD2you @JustThi30117912 @ChrisBBacon3 @rosmadiwahab 2/7. In that revisionist "wheelchair graph" the tiny hiccup in warming trend around 11K years ago is the Younger Dryas (YD). They show cooling of only 0.25°C, spread over 850 years, and undone by 0.25°C of warming over the next 400 years. That's absurd.
@Mark_A_Lunn @ZombiePiano @ClimateRetorts @RobAnderson17 @Anvndarnamn5 @S_D_Mannix @ammocrypta @wille99 @ItsTheAtmospher @Dcchristense @benmooreau @KCTaz @Climatehope2 @EthonRaptor @TWTThisIsNow @TheDisproof @B_Bolshevik100 @Data79504085 @Veritatem2021 @Jaisans @atherton_chris @WillWat6 @3GHtweets @DGinCheshire @BointonGiles @AuroriaTwittori @RushhourP @MartinJBern @Willard1951 @AristotleMrs @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 @DTGvmd @PaulDFarrar @Hji45519156 @Valja46Zhark5 @paulp1232 @ShroedingerBird @J0aquIm_B4rb0s4 @Sky48115666 @0Sundance @BradPKeyes @DoesThisW0rk @FD2you @JustThi30117912 @ChrisBBacon3 @rosmadiwahab 3/7. Greenland typically sees temperature changes 3-4× greater than the global average, but even if it were 10× greater, that wheelchair graph would still show only 2.5°C Greenland cooling over 850 years, and then 2.5°C warming over 400 years.
@Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 2/8. Note that Wong & Minnett didn't measure IR from CO2, they just mentioned it in passing. For their work they used IR from clouds, instead.
What's more, elsewhere in the paper they cited the IPCC's (too high) 3.7 W/m² (at TOA) per doubling figure. sealevel.info/Wong_and_Minne…
@Kenneth72712993 @ScienceBlog3 @RichardLWeiss @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics 3/8. 2.4 W/m² at the surface per doubling of CO2 and 3.8 W/m² at the surface per tripling of CO2 are consistent with van Wijngaarden & Happer's calculation of 3.0 W/m² radiative forcing at the mesopause per doubling of CO2.
@pbsnews @NewsHour @LisaDNews @mattloff @GeoffRBennett @tkconch 2/15》At 1:08 they reported, "He doubled down on climate denial, when asked about devastating wildfires & heatwaves that scientists agree are exacerbated by human activity."
That's false. MANY scientists DON'T "agree" that climate change exacerbates fires co2coalition.org
@pbsnews @NewsHour @LisaDNews @mattloff @GeoffRBennett @tkconch 3/15》Scientific organizations like the CO2 Coalition @CO2Coalition, and many top scientists, dispute the climate industry propaganda blaming fires on manmade climate change. What a shame that @PBSNews / PBS @NewsHour spread such misinformation.
@Whariwharangi @Data79504085 @RichardLWeiss @BenKoby1911 @JezRoff @emilio97493490 @balls95652097 @ScienceBlog3 @Kenneth72712993 @InspirallPE @Nockit1 @ammocrypta @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Michael_D_Crow @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @priscian @3GHtweets @Anvndarnamn5 @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @DaviesswPhD @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity Also, at 49 minutes Valentina Zharkova claimed LW IR wavelenths are so long, "10,000 meters, something, I don't remember exactly" that "the energy produced by this radiation is negligible." The wavelength is actually about 15 µm, and the energy is far from negligible.
@DaleGribble_666 @priscian @ammocrypta @Michael_D_Crow @Data79504085 @BenKoby1911 @emilio97493490 @InspirallPE @ScienceBlog3 @Kenneth72712993 @Nockit1 @Mark_A_Lunn @RichardLWeiss @ChrisBBacon3 @SpiruSensei @DenisDaly @WernerReinhard5 @controscience @Willard1951 @Fynnderella1 @SapientHetero @Veritatem2021 @C_R_O_M________ @balls95652097 @S_D_Mannix @Devonian1342 @AndreGrossza @Climatehope2 @S_Metzeler @3GHtweets @Anvndarnamn5 @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @AuroriaEn @JusticeTrudeau @judgementalbe1 @AristotleMrs @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @BillPrecht @DiseaseMatters @CoralReefFish @DavidJSuggett @CoralResearch @SteinhartBart @CoralMorph @ConnTrinity @reefgenomics …He also taught in ornithology & botany, and served as the Principal Investigator for the Neotropical Migratory Bird Monitoring of Riparian Habitats on the Tahoe National Forest project sponsored by the US Forest Service from 1991 to 2007.
@BenKoby1911 @DenisDaly @Zane1968 @Hji45519156 @SpiruSensei @AndreGrossza @Data79504085 @Willard1951 @ammocrypta @Climatehope2 @AristotleMrs @Anvndarnamn5 @InspirallPE @ChrisBBacon3 @C_R_O_M________ @S_Metzeler @priscian @ScienceBlog3 @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @Veritatem2021 @AuroriaEn @Michael_D_Crow @JusticeTrudeau @Mark_A_Lunn @judgementalbe1 @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @WernerReinhard5 @S_D_Mannix @JimBlack48 @Jaisans @CarrudoDon @LiveLifeBK24 @TheDisproof @Joeyd87745119 @Devonian1342 @waxliberty @SuperFoxyLoxy @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 @NASA Re: "The last interglacial period saw temperatures higher then we are now."
You're referring to the Eemian Interglacial Optimum. I have info on it here
Its peak is believed to have been substantially warmer than even the warmest part of current Holocene. https://t.co/JyRG6GyFxjsealevel.info/glossary.html#…
@BenKoby1911 @DenisDaly @Zane1968 @Hji45519156 @SpiruSensei @AndreGrossza @Data79504085 @Willard1951 @ammocrypta @Climatehope2 @AristotleMrs @Anvndarnamn5 @InspirallPE @ChrisBBacon3 @C_R_O_M________ @S_Metzeler @priscian @ScienceBlog3 @3GHtweets @PvtMcAuslan @EdwardRiffle @Veritatem2021 @AuroriaEn @Michael_D_Crow @JusticeTrudeau @Mark_A_Lunn @judgementalbe1 @Coleski14 @wallytoms0 @LesserMegadeath @WernerReinhard5 @S_D_Mannix @JimBlack48 @Jaisans @CarrudoDon @LiveLifeBK24 @TheDisproof @Joeyd87745119 @Devonian1342 @waxliberty @SuperFoxyLoxy @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 @NASA Re: "The fastest warming period in the last 15k years was the younger dryas."
True! The Younger Dryas termination saw warming about an order of magnitude faster than our recent warming.
@LaurenWitzkeDE 2/5》Garnet Harper was ineligible for transplant consideration for 2 reasons:
1. Poor health. He had severe heart & lung problems, and he'd nearly died from a staph infection.
2. His refusal to take essential steps to protect his own health, like masking and Covid vaccination.
@LaurenWitzkeDE 3/5》Because transplant recipients must be on immunosuppressants for life, it is critically important for them to take every reasonable precaution to protect against infections — and Mr. Harper had already almost died from an infection.
《1/12⟫ Someone asked how we can know the ongoing rise in atmospheric CO2 level is entirely from human emissions, since Earth's climate is so complex.
Fortunately, you don't need a climate model to answer that question. It's as easy as (steps) A, B, C:sealevel.info/co2.html
《2/12⟫ A. The bean-counters keep good track of production & use of fossil fuels and Portland cement, and simple chemistry tells us how much CO2 is produced from them. That's "fossil carbon." (Irrelevant side note: fossil carbon is almost completely depleted of radioactive 14C.)
《3/12⟫ There are also "land use change emissions" (e.g., clearing forests, draining swamps), which produce non-fossil CO2 emissions. They are poorly constrained, but certainly less then 15% of fossil emissions (probably about 10%). sealevel.info/carbon/Dohner2…