It was an incredibly harrowing 6 mile hike at midnight through heavy and slippery mud, but I got safely out of Burning Man. Never been before and it was fantastic (with brilliant art and fabulous music)…except the ending.
For those of you with friends who are there: 1) More rain is projected. It’s very wet right now and cars and other vehicles can’t drive and likely can’t for several days. 2) There is a lot of food and water and people are really generous and sharing, 3) we decided to make the hike, but it is very slippery and the mud is like cement and sticks to your boots. It also has some quicksand properties — it grabs your boots and sometimes you are stuck. No one should try this unless in good shape and part of a group. It was quite hard, and will get harder if/when it rains more. Talk your friends out of the hike unless you really think they can do it safely. There are treacherous places where it is worse than walking on ice. 4) If they do hike, tell them to use GPS, download a map if they can, walk out at 6 o,clock and try to go in as straight a line as possible to the closest road meeting point it. There is no cell reception for the first 60% (att) and 70% (Verizon). They should try to arrange someone to pick them up at the meeting point before they leave if at all possible. 5) if they are hiking they should time it so that there will not be rain for 2-3 hours from the time they start 6) Most impt thing is to encourage them to be safe. If it takes several days to leave, so be it. These are dangerous conditions to hike and will likely get worse.
I hope this helps. Please know I’m no weather, traffic, or hiking expert —these are just my observations after doing the hike. Thinking of you all. I’m now off to a very needed sleep.
One other thing: if someone you know is hiking, they need to prepare their boots. Plastic bag on your bare foot, then sock over it, then put boot or shoe on. There are lots of places where you sink into the mud down to your ankle. You need the plastic bag to avoid being soaked
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump is not only indicted, his name is mentioned 193 times in the indictment, and the charges go out of the way to show Trump directly violated the law
THREAD REACTING TO INDICTMENT TEXT 1. The indictment is far more detailed than the basic, bare-bones one prosecutors file. An indictment with this level of detail is a “speaking indictment" and this indictment speaks loud&clear: they have damning evidence–and a lot of it at that
2. I think the most notable part of this indictment is that so much of it is told through Trump’s own words. It lists damaging statement after damaging statement before, during, and after these subpoenas were issued. In a way, Trump’s big mouth is what ultimately did him in.
3. Normally, at the indictment stage, I’d caution that it’s hard to know the extent of the prosecution’s case and possible defenses. But this indictment is so thorough and so profoundly bad for Trump, that I’m not really sure how he candefend himself.
My views on United States v. Trump, the 1st indictment of a former President ever: 1. Its a sad moment–not sad because Trump is being targeted or treated unfairly – but sad b/c it underscores the extreme damage he has done to the institution of the presidency&country as a whole
2. I think this was really the only outcome that the Justice Department could arrive at. What kind of message would it send to the people who risk their lives gathering covert information if the govt allows someone to behave so recklessly w/ our nation’s most important secrets?
3. These charges are not only an important step to protect our national security, but also to preserve the rule of law in America. This indictment makes it clear that no person – not even a former president – can brazenly disregard the law without consequence.
Just so folks know just how powerful AI is, Im writing an oped on Special Counsels&Barr. On a lark,I asked #ChatGPT “write a 1000 word essay about special counsels and bill Barr in the style of neal Katyal”
Ive been thinking and advising on AI for 5 years. I’m legit freaked out
It might be hard for others to understand, but basically the AI has captured my voice and thoughts. It is only 80% there, but it is mind-busting to see it there already.
I have thought about AI and guardrails and even devised a Constitution of sorts for AI. But …
I didn’t think we’d need it so soon.
This is going to change, not everything, but a lot. A huge lot.
Sorry for my delay, have been dealing with some difficult things and just seeing this.
I appreciate the question. I don’t think the timing of when the investigation commenced is the relevant issue, as much as whether Durham was conducting this investigation as part of his …
Special Counsel duties. As I understand the reporting, he was so doing, and, if so, it would make sense that it would be included in his final report. But note that we were also concerned about final reports tarring people without an indictment & a chance to defend themselves
due to the Starr Report (concerns that were vindicated in the way Comey behaved in 2016) So while I think we all thought such matters should be part of a final report, it was not contemplated that everything in a final report, no matter how scurrilous, should be …
Such a privilege to argue #MoorevHarper in the Supreme Court on behalf of Becky Harper, @CommonCause & other voter protection groups. Anything you liked in my argument was really the product of incredible work by so many, especially @judgeluttig, Abha Khanna, Elisabeth Theodore +
Stanton Jones, Allison Riggs, Katie Wellington, Will Havemann, Olivia Molodanof, Sam Hirsch, Jessie Amunson, Zach Shauf, Erik Zimmerman, and many many more.
A decision is expected by June, 2023.
I can't tell you how many sleepless nights these people put into this. If you know any of them, please thank them.