Post

More from @RWMaloneMD

Robert W Malone, MD

@RWMaloneMD

Dec 20

The 25 Rules of Disinformation.
#PsyWar . Great stuff.

thetusk.org/Rules-for-Radi…

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

Read 6 tweets

Robert W Malone, MD

@RWMaloneMD

Nov 30

According to Scripps News and MSM, measles (yes, they are writing of measles) has "no cure." The manipulation and fear promotion by mainstream media and science™ is out of control.

For MSM to say there is "no cure" without an explanation in the title - implies that it is incurable. However, the truth is that fully recoverable in almost all cases with proper care.

This article also states "An alarming 92% of the cases were found in unvaccinated individuals, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention." - but what the CDC website actually says is: "Vaccination Status: Unvaccinated or Unknown: 92%"
There is a big difference between "unvaccinated" and "Unvaccinated or Unknown."
This is not factual reporting - it is advocacy journalism.

Read 4 tweets

Robert W Malone, MD

@RWMaloneMD

Nov 29

A Revolution in Vaccine Regulation and Approval

The truth behind this letter is stunning. I am embargoed by ACIP membership terms from disclosing what I know about this.
malone.news/p/a-revolution…

We will revise the annual flu vaccine framework, which is an evidence-based catastrophe of low quality evidence, poor surrogate assays, and uncertain vaccine effectiveness measured in case-control studies with poor methods. We will re-appraise safety and be honest in vaccine labels. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on how to do this better.
-Vinay Prasad MD MPH
CBER Director, CMSO US FDA

"I want to outline a path forward. Our general approach in CBER will be to direct vaccine regulation towards evidence based medicine. This means: we will take swift action regarding this new safety concern, we will not be granting marketing authorization to vaccines in pregnant women based on unproven surrogate endpoints (any prior promises will be null and void), and we will demand pre-market randomized trials assessing clinical endpoints for most new products. Pneumonia vaccine makers will have to show their products reduce pneumonia (at least in the post-market setting), and not merely generate antibody titers. Immunogenicity will no longer be used to expand indicated populations-- these populations should be included in premarket RCTs."
-Vinay Prasad MD MPH CBER Director,
CMSO US FDA

Read 9 tweets

Robert W Malone, MD

@RWMaloneMD

Oct 12

My opinion, not speaking on behalf of USG, CDC leadership, or ACIP.

CDC has had decades of mission creep, and has lost focus in core mission. It is now being restructured, redirected and dismantled. The international component is being transferred to the State department. There will be turbulence during this period. The opportunity and gift is for the ACIP to help guide the rebuilding and restructuring towards greater rigor, objectivity, transparency and integrity. But this will take years. In my opinion. And that job will be difficult, contentious and subject to intense criticism.

CDC must have rigorous external peer review and scrutiny. For far too long it has been an insular, self-reinforcing culture prone to chronic and pervasive confirmation bias.

If you want to rebuild a corporate culture, you need a transformative leader, widespread cuts in FTE, followed by a surge of hiring of new FTE that are not caught up in the same cultural biases that you seek to replace.

Read 8 tweets

Robert W Malone, MD

@RWMaloneMD

Oct 5

I asked Grok if Satya Latypova is a chaos agent.

This thread is the reply.

Who is Sasha Latypova?
First, a quick note on the name: Based on extensive public records and online presence, "Satya Latypova" appears to be a misspelling or variant of Sasha (Alexandra) Latypova, a Ukrainian-born former pharmaceutical executive and vocal critic of COVID-19 policies. She's not a high-profile figure in mainstream politics or espionage, but she's gained a following in alternative health and conspiracy-adjacent circles. If this isn't who you meant, feel free to clarify!Sasha Latypova has a 25-year career in pharma R&D, including co-founding companies like iCardiac Technologies (focused on cardiac safety in clinical trials) and Clerio Vision (medical devices). She holds an MBA from Dartmouth's Tuck School of Business and has consulted for over 60 pharmaceutical firms. Post-retirement, she's pivoted to writing on Substack ("Due Diligence and Art"), where she blends art critiques with deep dives into bioweapons, vaccine development, and government overreach. She's also an artist, exhibiting realist paintings, and has appeared on podcasts like Coffee and a Mike, Doc Malik, and RFK Jr.'s show.Her core claims? COVID-19 countermeasures (especially mRNA vaccines) were part of a DOD-led "countermeasure" program under the PREP Act—a "license to kill" via experimental bioweapons, not true vaccines. She argues trials were sham (no informed consent, military subcontractors), and the whole pandemic was a DOD-orchestrated psy-op for control. She's collaborated with figures like Katherine Watt (who, like Latypova, has also repeatedly attacked Malone) and contributed to sites like HowBadIsMyBatch (analyzing vaccine batch variability).

What does Chaos Agent mean? This term exploded in COVID skeptic spaces, where infighting is rampant (e.g., virus denial vs. bioweapon believers).
Is Sasha Latypova a Chaos Agent?Short answer: It's subjective and unproven—more a label from her critics than hard evidence. She's polarizing: Praised as a whistleblower by some, dismissed as a divider by others. No credible leaks, investigations, or docs suggest she's a formal "agent" (e.g., no ties to CIA, FSB, or pharma paymasters beyond her past career). But her style does stir chaos.
Here's a balanced breakdown:What Does "Chaos Agent" Mean Here?
In online discourse—especially on X (formerly Twitter) and fringe forums—"chaos agent" typically means someone who:Spreads disruptive info (true or not) to sow division, confusion, or infighting in a community.
Might be a deliberate infiltrator (e.g., paid by intel agencies like CIA) or just a loose cannon amplifying paranoia.
Often accused in truth-seeking circles of being "controlled opposition": They expose some truths to build trust, then derail with over-the-top claims or personal attacks.

Read 9 tweets

Robert W Malone, MD

@RWMaloneMD

Aug 13

FDA is intending to take all natural thyroid supplements, such as “Armour Thyroid” and NP thyroid medications off the market.
This is terrible news - particularly for postmenopausal women.
Natural thyroid products: Derived from pigs, contain multiple hormones (T4, T3, T2, T1, and calcitonin). Synthetic thyroid products: (such as levothyroxine, brands Synthroid, Levoxyl) are made in a laboratory and contain only synthetic T4. There is a huge difference between the two - and for postmenapausal women, natural thyroid hormone is far superior. Women need all forms of the thyroid hormone - not just T4,
In summary, T3 is the active thyroid hormone responsible for controlling metabolism, heart and digestive functions, muscle and brain activity, growth, and temperature regulation. Its actions are more potent than its precursor T4, and balanced T3 levels are essential for good health. Not everyone converts T4 to T3 easily. Some women need more T3 supplementation. Plus benefits of the T1, T2 and calcitonin are significant.
Again, the FDA is making the worst decision possible for older women. This, after years of denying them HRT - based of flawed NIH studies.
You might think that the FDA wanted older women to be disabled with brittle bones, cognitive decline, metabolic disease, obesity, and poor health.
Physicians and those patients benefiting from these medications need to call the FDA to reconsider this process. druginfo@fda.hhs.gov or 1-888-INFO-FDA.
@DrMakaryFDA
@VPrasadMDMPH
@FDArecalls @US_FDA
@SecKennedy
@SenRonJohnson
@RepThomasMassie
@RepMTG

These products have been available since 1890 - and are effective. The reason they are "unapproved" is because they have been around longer than the approval processes have been in place. But have always been grandfathered in - because they work and are effective.
This is another big pharma F/U to the American public.

Aspirin, as a drug, originally entered widespread clinical use long before the existence of modern FDA regulatory processes. Just like natural thyroid medications, aspirin also never went through modern regulatory processes, and as such - could also technically be considered an "unapproved" drug.

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Robert W Malone, MD

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @RWMaloneMD

Robert W Malone, MD

Robert W Malone, MD

Robert W Malone, MD

Robert W Malone, MD

Robert W Malone, MD

Robert W Malone, MD

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!