Read on Twitter
If Jews control Wall St. And central banks, why did Wall St. Bankers finance Hitler's military buildup?
Why were they sitting on the board of the most important German industries like I.G. Farben (and most others) even during WW2?
Why did Hitler gather up ambassadors of international finance capital to fund his electoral campaign?
Why were international capitalists meeting with Hitler as far back as the early 20's?
Why did global central banks (BIS) continue to work with, finance, and collect payments from Nazis during WW2?
Why did the Nazis continue to pay international central banks the debt that the City of London artificially propped up in the 1920's? Weren't the Nazis campaigning against war reparations? Why did they continue to pay them in a new, disguised form?
Why were the two biggest financial capitalist families in America - Morgan's and Rockefellers, non-Jewish? What were they doing working with the Nazis? Why were all the German industrial cartels that funded the Nazis startups propped up by JP Morgan and Wall St.?
Why didn't the allies open up a second front? Wasn't defeating Hitler Britain's number one goal? Why didn't they help the Soviets do it?
Why did the Bank of England willingly transfer all of Czechslovakia's gold to the Nazis?
Why was the Soviet Union the only country to warn about Hitler's destructive intentions? Why did Britain and France appease Hitler while rejecting all attempts by the Soviets to form security pacts against rising German aggression?
If the Jews controlled England, surely they would have done everything to stop Hitler!
Why is it that in the postwar period, the card carrying Nazi German captains of industry maintained all their wealth and power?
Why did Nazi officials retain positions of political power in West Germany, and why were so many welcomed into NATO's commanding positions?
Why did the Reischsbank retain all power and privileges in the postwar period?
If "the Jews" were so powerful, why were they powerless to prevent this?
Here is the truth: International banksters propped up Hitler to loot the Soviet Union's wealth, and use it to finance their New World Order.
Their plan was to keep 90% of the world in colonial slavery, and return serfdom for the European and American working classes.
And were it not for the heroic Soviet Union, Klaus Shwab and Bill Gate's dreams would have come true nearly 80 years early.
We all know that there are wealthy and powerful Jews among the international ruling class. But the facts are conclusive beyond doubt: They are a minority.
So who are those attacking and singling out Jews truly serving? Ask yourself that question.
There is a reason none of the rightists will debate me on this topic. The Right are not original and independent thinkers. None of their research was conducted independently.
I do not believe they are pushing this ideology independently.
Here is the likely truth:
Wealthy benefactors with Nazi sympathies, who likely have direct ties to German Nazism itself historically, created the modern "Dissident Right" as we know it.
And who knows how far the connections back to the real elites these benefactors go!
Why were they sitting on the board of the most important German industries like I.G. Farben (and most others) even during WW2?
Why did Hitler gather up ambassadors of international finance capital to fund his electoral campaign?
Why were international capitalists meeting with Hitler as far back as the early 20's?
Why did global central banks (BIS) continue to work with, finance, and collect payments from Nazis during WW2?
Why did the Nazis continue to pay international central banks the debt that the City of London artificially propped up in the 1920's? Weren't the Nazis campaigning against war reparations? Why did they continue to pay them in a new, disguised form?
Why were the two biggest financial capitalist families in America - Morgan's and Rockefellers, non-Jewish? What were they doing working with the Nazis? Why were all the German industrial cartels that funded the Nazis startups propped up by JP Morgan and Wall St.?
Why didn't the allies open up a second front? Wasn't defeating Hitler Britain's number one goal? Why didn't they help the Soviets do it?
Why did the Bank of England willingly transfer all of Czechslovakia's gold to the Nazis?
Why was the Soviet Union the only country to warn about Hitler's destructive intentions? Why did Britain and France appease Hitler while rejecting all attempts by the Soviets to form security pacts against rising German aggression?
If the Jews controlled England, surely they would have done everything to stop Hitler!
Why is it that in the postwar period, the card carrying Nazi German captains of industry maintained all their wealth and power?
Why did Nazi officials retain positions of political power in West Germany, and why were so many welcomed into NATO's commanding positions?
Why did the Reischsbank retain all power and privileges in the postwar period?
If "the Jews" were so powerful, why were they powerless to prevent this?
Here is the truth: International banksters propped up Hitler to loot the Soviet Union's wealth, and use it to finance their New World Order.
Their plan was to keep 90% of the world in colonial slavery, and return serfdom for the European and American working classes.
And were it not for the heroic Soviet Union, Klaus Shwab and Bill Gate's dreams would have come true nearly 80 years early.
We all know that there are wealthy and powerful Jews among the international ruling class. But the facts are conclusive beyond doubt: They are a minority.
So who are those attacking and singling out Jews truly serving? Ask yourself that question.
There is a reason none of the rightists will debate me on this topic. The Right are not original and independent thinkers. None of their research was conducted independently.
I do not believe they are pushing this ideology independently.
Here is the likely truth:
Wealthy benefactors with Nazi sympathies, who likely have direct ties to German Nazism itself historically, created the modern "Dissident Right" as we know it.
And who knows how far the connections back to the real elites these benefactors go!
@GeoYmalleb He goes through all the effort to find irrelevant clips from a 2021 debate about China, which do not even prove any of his points, instead of just debating me! HAHAHAHAHAHA
So much effort to run from debate!
So much effort to run from debate!
@GeoYmalleb All this can be conclusively settled in a debate on the history of the Nazis.
Instead, you bullshit in my replies like a rodent.
Instead, you bullshit in my replies like a rodent.
You claim my questions are nonsensical but your respond with nothing but concessions, lies, incoherent and nonsensical points and total jibbering.
1) You concede that the majority of people in power at the time in Germany, US and Britain were not Jewish.
Thanks for confirming and reinforcing my point you fucking idiot, the only problem with that is that it was the entire foundational worldview, and founding justification for Hitler and the Nazi party that the contrary was true. Hitler was constantly lying to everyone, by your own admission, when he was saying that the major financial capitalist power in Germany - let alone the entire Anglo-American empire - was Jewish. You admit that this was not the case, thereby proving that Hitler was a fucking liar.
The fact of the matter is that this alone is enough to debunk the entire basis of Nazi 'anti-Jew' yip yap, but you somehow think this aids your point.
You only claim that Jews had a 'lot of control' in Germany - which is vague nonsense. Clearly this control was not enough to put an end to the extensive financial and business ties between Germany and International finance capital even after Hitler's rise to power, the removal of Jewish officials from government the boycott of all Jewish businesses.
Clearly this 'lot of control' was not enough to comprise an actual ruling class, as the Nazi liars and Adolf Hitler had claimed.
2) You claim that the Jews amassed power by "jumping off the back of one empire to another after WW2." But by your own admission, IDIOT, you already claimed that the Jews did not control England before WW2. So by that logic, whatever 'transfer' occurred does not justify the 'JQ' theory at all.
Moreover, the non-Jewish dynastic elites, who you concede were in the majority before WW2, retained all the power that they had before. It could hardly be said that Rockefeller, for example, had their power diminished after WW2. The contrary is true: It was greatly increased.
3) Theodore Herzl, the Zionist movement, and the balfour declaration would not have been possible without support from the non-Jewish Anglo-Saxon elites. You claim that they already had a state in Israel - which isn't true. They had settlements. You claim they printed propaganda against Hitler from there.
Yes, the Jews were not happy about Hitler, whose entire career was built off of shit talking Jews. What a big surprise! In any case, this unhappiness on the part of Jews, and their efforts against Hitler, was clearly not enough to dissuade Wall St. and the city of London from propping him up, his power, his economy, his re-armanent, and the fulfillment of all of his goals.
As a matter of fact, if anything, this proves that Hitler was a liar and JQ was bullshit. If the Jews were so powerful, and so openly poised against Hitler, why didn't this stop international finance capital from helping the Nazis? Because as you conceded earlier, they didn't control it.
4) This is the typical retard Right wing argument - to accuse my arguemnts of being identical with Anthony Sutton, someone with whom I disagree strongly on many topics. You do not need to be Anthony Sutton, or 'plagiarize' him, to know that Wall St. funded Hitler. All that matters are the relevant primary sources. I will provide some by Sutton himself bellow. I do not care about which author may have popularized them.
Dimitrov and the Comintern were saying that Fascism was an arm of international finance capital before Sutton every wrote a single book. Did Sutton plagiarize Dimitrov?
5) The claim that Wall St. was behind the Bolshevik revolution can be easily debunked by consulting primary sources. Sutton can be wrong about this claim, while also being correct about other claims. I am not responsible for Sutton's words nor am I Sutton myself. I care about the actual facts - something the Retard Right confuses with rhetoric.
The retard Right regularly claims, for example, that Jacob Schiff was a supporter of the Bolsheviks.
And by the admission of SUTTON HIMSELF IN THAT SAME BOOK, yet we have ample evidence to support the fact, including from US government cables in the 20's, the Schiff not only withdrew all support for the Russian government after the Bolshevik revolution, but supported bankers who were funding the whites.
The only 'supporter' was the leftist ideologist Olaf Aschberg, who was dismissed from helping manage Soviet foreign trade during the NEP years within a few years for mishandling funds. Moreover, Aschberg's support did not represent the will of Wall St., but his own personal, private beliefs.
Also, his 'support' is tenuous. Sutton cites a meeting Aschberg has with Wall St. leaders in 1916... But omits the fact that Aschberg was acting on behalf of the Tsar's finance minister to get a loan of 50 million. How could he, or those ministers have known that loan could end up with a new revolutionary government?
In any case, the support for those same Wall St. circles for the White Counter-Revolution is well documented and well-known, confirming there was no intention to support Bolsheviks.
The strongest arguments Sutton makes about ties to Wall St. is Trotsky's mysterious meetings and the mysterious circumstances of the British freeing him from his prison cell in Canada. But Trotsky was exposed as a sabateur later on by Stalin.
Trotsky was not even a Bolshevik, and jumped on the bandwagon of revolution only after Lenin was set on it. He tried to sabatoge the goals of the revolution, like Brest-Litvosk peace talks, showing he wanted to stay in the war - an anti-Bolshevik line.
6) It isn't necessarily true that Sutton's theory rests on the financing the Nazis received from Wall St. after Hitler assumed power. Sutton provides ample evidence that major German capitalist leaders connected to Wall St. funded Hitler before 1932, and that moreover, major German industrial cartels, such as I.G. Farben, I.T.T., and others were startups created by JP Morgan and Wall St.
You have cases where German companies like DAPAG are 94% owned by Rockefeller Standard Oil.
Sutton also gives special significance to the Dawes and Young Plan, which themselves created the conditions for the re-booting of German militarism and financial capitalist monopoly cartels. These were meant to 'pay off' impossible loans, and an impossible war debt.
Of course, the real reason was a re-ordering and re-structuring of Germany and Europe at large a la 'Great Reset' - using debt as a political tool of control over society and government.
Were it not for this 'debt' the German financial crisis, and ultimately the conditions that gave rise to Hitler would not have occurred. It is a myth that Hitler got rid of the debt too - the war reparations merely took on a new name.
Through the Bank of International Settlements, the Nazis, even through WW2, continued to pay back this debt in order to maintain a line of credit with international central banks.
7) The view that Sutton's logic - that Wall St. funded both the Bolshevik revolution and Hitler in the same capacity - is incoherent, is an indictment on Sutton's view, not mine. I am not the one who thinks Wall St. funded the Soviet Union, nor do I need to think that to agree with the primary sources Sutton compiles about who financed and supported the Nazi party.
For starters, Sutton's claims about Wall St. being behind Nazism are FAR STRONGER than his claims about Bolshevik revolution. Sutton can only really name Olaf Aschberg as a 'financier' with any credible evidence - an anomaly. But we have extensive and direct ties between major German industrialists, capitalists and financiers and Wall St. that are far more incriminating.
8) The view that this renders WW2 inexplicable is nonsense. The German war machine was created to loot the Soviet Union and implement a New World Order. Which it did - partially. It was the Soviets who resisted it, refusing to join Bretton-Woods and resisting the New World Order at every turn in the aftermath.
Once again, if the primary goal by the allies was the defeat of the Nazis - and not triggering war to destroy and restructure Europe as they see fit - why did they not open a second front to help the Soviets when the latter asked?
9) Hitler was indeed vocal about his opposition to international monopoly capital. The Nazi party program even included provisions to nationalize monopolies. But it didn't happen! Hitler and the Nazis were liars, trying to steal votes away from socialists and communists. The fact is, cynically, even before the final Nazi programme, pre-1932, as you can see, it was precisely international monopoly capital that was supporting Hitler.
As we see with the modern Retard Right, rhetoric and reality can not be further apart. Actions speak louder than words, and Hitler in practice was a WHORE of international finance capital! Pussy could not even nationalize IG Farben!
10) In no way does my theory rest solely on 'Hjalmar Schacht' but it is worth mentioning him - he supported Hitler and was part of the Nazi circle of friends well before it was pragmatic to do so (pre-1932). His replacement, Funk - was still a director of the BIS - maintained all connections to international finance capital and capitalists.
Moreover, Schacht was not thrown in a labor camp for having ties to capitalists - which Funk entirely maintained - but for allegedly conspiring to overthrow Hitler in 1943, after Hitler had already shit the bed. That is hardly evidence capitalists were against Hitler - it is evidence that Hitler FAILED to carry out their goals, being the incompetent, raging retard he was, who got BTFO by the Red Army.
11) Germany was not destitute because of Jews, who did not make up most of the usury class in the first place. Germany was destitute because of the ridiculous reparations exacted by Britain in order to pay back the Americans for loans. The Dawes Plan, which added private usury as as part of the architecture of this overall debt, was overseen by JP Morgan and a collection of other mainly non-Jewish Wall St. Atlanticist financial capitalists.
This debt was artifically maintained and enforced by the British, who even agreed to settling with the Americans on double the original amount. Why? Because the Atlanticists were using it as a vehicle to implement the New World Order. Jews can hardly be blamed for this on any general level.
Some mid-level Jewish hucksters in Germany in no way represented the true power of financial capitalist elites.
12) Sutton provides plenty of evidence that Hitler was backed by financial capitalists.
I can tell you didn't read the book, fucking retard, because if you did you would see it's very clear and direct. You even have evidence that the chairman of Royal Dutch Shell supported Hitler as early as the 1920's. And this evidence is supported by the fact that he was an ardent Nazi supporter in the 30's, vicious anti-Bolshevik, and his funeral was overseen by the Nazis.
13) Lend Lease was entirely neglible: 85% of it was only received in the USSR after 1943, well after the tides of war changed and Soviet victory was certain. According to historians, without Lend Lease, it would have just delayed the inevitable victory by 12-18 months. Moreover, you are not putting any of your figures into perspective.
For example, 10 billion is a huge amount - but pales in comparison to the over 33 billion Britain, which sustained far less losses and committed far less resources to defeating the Nazis - received.
6400 tanks sound like a lot, until you realize the Soviets produced 30,000 of their own in the span of a few years alone. Whatever the Soviets received from Lend Lease was dwarfed by what they were producing domestically. The idea that it was decisive for victory is a hilarious cope and myth.
The quote by Stalin you gave has no primary source - likely a fabrication. Usually Lend Lease retards quote Zhukov and Khruschev to support their claims - two anti-Stalin and pro-American subversives.
14) Stalin was a Manlet? Hitler was not tall himself. Hitler also killed himself, and Stalin conquered him and destroyed his 'reich'. What pathetic cope. Stalin was the real man, Hitler was a raging, screeching pussy who got BTFO. Stalin won, Hitler lost. It's that simple.
15) Nobody cares about Harry Hopkins wife (KEK). Why couldn't his Jewish wife secure Lend Lease arriving before 1943? Dumbass
16) Nobody cares about Sokolov. He is a bitch who provides no evidence for his claims. He just makes claims - similar to the Retard Right - with zero primary sources.
17) England did not 'lose its superpower status,' it merely transfered its shadow networks to offshore banking colonies, maintaining financial control over the US and establishing the deep state - such as the CIA via the OSS. Truman was a puppet of international bankers who quelled all of FDR's plans against them and started the cold war not on behalf of Jews but on behalf of the Atlanticist elites that FDR was fighting against.
FDR wanted to dissolve the BIS. The Atlanticists prevented it - and Truman made sure it was in intact.
18) It's not the Jews - you fucking shill - it is the capitalist class and always has been. You shill for them and will never admit the truth. Whatever Jews are in power are in power as capitalists and not as Jews.
Broke Orthodox Jews in Brooklyn have nothing to do with any real power.
COMMUNISM WINS AGAIN. 1945 ALL OVER AGAIN. THE WEST HAS FALLEN AND I JUST PLANTED A FUCKING RED FLAG OVER YOUR ENTIRE WORLD. YOU JUST GOT WRECKED FOR THE SECOND TIME, IN ADDITION TO THE L YOU TOOK DURING DEBATE.
SUBMIT TO THE KHAN, BITCH.
1) You concede that the majority of people in power at the time in Germany, US and Britain were not Jewish.
Thanks for confirming and reinforcing my point you fucking idiot, the only problem with that is that it was the entire foundational worldview, and founding justification for Hitler and the Nazi party that the contrary was true. Hitler was constantly lying to everyone, by your own admission, when he was saying that the major financial capitalist power in Germany - let alone the entire Anglo-American empire - was Jewish. You admit that this was not the case, thereby proving that Hitler was a fucking liar.
The fact of the matter is that this alone is enough to debunk the entire basis of Nazi 'anti-Jew' yip yap, but you somehow think this aids your point.
You only claim that Jews had a 'lot of control' in Germany - which is vague nonsense. Clearly this control was not enough to put an end to the extensive financial and business ties between Germany and International finance capital even after Hitler's rise to power, the removal of Jewish officials from government the boycott of all Jewish businesses.
Clearly this 'lot of control' was not enough to comprise an actual ruling class, as the Nazi liars and Adolf Hitler had claimed.
2) You claim that the Jews amassed power by "jumping off the back of one empire to another after WW2." But by your own admission, IDIOT, you already claimed that the Jews did not control England before WW2. So by that logic, whatever 'transfer' occurred does not justify the 'JQ' theory at all.
Moreover, the non-Jewish dynastic elites, who you concede were in the majority before WW2, retained all the power that they had before. It could hardly be said that Rockefeller, for example, had their power diminished after WW2. The contrary is true: It was greatly increased.
3) Theodore Herzl, the Zionist movement, and the balfour declaration would not have been possible without support from the non-Jewish Anglo-Saxon elites. You claim that they already had a state in Israel - which isn't true. They had settlements. You claim they printed propaganda against Hitler from there.
Yes, the Jews were not happy about Hitler, whose entire career was built off of shit talking Jews. What a big surprise! In any case, this unhappiness on the part of Jews, and their efforts against Hitler, was clearly not enough to dissuade Wall St. and the city of London from propping him up, his power, his economy, his re-armanent, and the fulfillment of all of his goals.
As a matter of fact, if anything, this proves that Hitler was a liar and JQ was bullshit. If the Jews were so powerful, and so openly poised against Hitler, why didn't this stop international finance capital from helping the Nazis? Because as you conceded earlier, they didn't control it.
4) This is the typical retard Right wing argument - to accuse my arguemnts of being identical with Anthony Sutton, someone with whom I disagree strongly on many topics. You do not need to be Anthony Sutton, or 'plagiarize' him, to know that Wall St. funded Hitler. All that matters are the relevant primary sources. I will provide some by Sutton himself bellow. I do not care about which author may have popularized them.
Dimitrov and the Comintern were saying that Fascism was an arm of international finance capital before Sutton every wrote a single book. Did Sutton plagiarize Dimitrov?
5) The claim that Wall St. was behind the Bolshevik revolution can be easily debunked by consulting primary sources. Sutton can be wrong about this claim, while also being correct about other claims. I am not responsible for Sutton's words nor am I Sutton myself. I care about the actual facts - something the Retard Right confuses with rhetoric.
The retard Right regularly claims, for example, that Jacob Schiff was a supporter of the Bolsheviks.
And by the admission of SUTTON HIMSELF IN THAT SAME BOOK, yet we have ample evidence to support the fact, including from US government cables in the 20's, the Schiff not only withdrew all support for the Russian government after the Bolshevik revolution, but supported bankers who were funding the whites.
The only 'supporter' was the leftist ideologist Olaf Aschberg, who was dismissed from helping manage Soviet foreign trade during the NEP years within a few years for mishandling funds. Moreover, Aschberg's support did not represent the will of Wall St., but his own personal, private beliefs.
Also, his 'support' is tenuous. Sutton cites a meeting Aschberg has with Wall St. leaders in 1916... But omits the fact that Aschberg was acting on behalf of the Tsar's finance minister to get a loan of 50 million. How could he, or those ministers have known that loan could end up with a new revolutionary government?
In any case, the support for those same Wall St. circles for the White Counter-Revolution is well documented and well-known, confirming there was no intention to support Bolsheviks.
The strongest arguments Sutton makes about ties to Wall St. is Trotsky's mysterious meetings and the mysterious circumstances of the British freeing him from his prison cell in Canada. But Trotsky was exposed as a sabateur later on by Stalin.
Trotsky was not even a Bolshevik, and jumped on the bandwagon of revolution only after Lenin was set on it. He tried to sabatoge the goals of the revolution, like Brest-Litvosk peace talks, showing he wanted to stay in the war - an anti-Bolshevik line.
6) It isn't necessarily true that Sutton's theory rests on the financing the Nazis received from Wall St. after Hitler assumed power. Sutton provides ample evidence that major German capitalist leaders connected to Wall St. funded Hitler before 1932, and that moreover, major German industrial cartels, such as I.G. Farben, I.T.T., and others were startups created by JP Morgan and Wall St.
You have cases where German companies like DAPAG are 94% owned by Rockefeller Standard Oil.
Sutton also gives special significance to the Dawes and Young Plan, which themselves created the conditions for the re-booting of German militarism and financial capitalist monopoly cartels. These were meant to 'pay off' impossible loans, and an impossible war debt.
Of course, the real reason was a re-ordering and re-structuring of Germany and Europe at large a la 'Great Reset' - using debt as a political tool of control over society and government.
Were it not for this 'debt' the German financial crisis, and ultimately the conditions that gave rise to Hitler would not have occurred. It is a myth that Hitler got rid of the debt too - the war reparations merely took on a new name.
Through the Bank of International Settlements, the Nazis, even through WW2, continued to pay back this debt in order to maintain a line of credit with international central banks.
7) The view that Sutton's logic - that Wall St. funded both the Bolshevik revolution and Hitler in the same capacity - is incoherent, is an indictment on Sutton's view, not mine. I am not the one who thinks Wall St. funded the Soviet Union, nor do I need to think that to agree with the primary sources Sutton compiles about who financed and supported the Nazi party.
For starters, Sutton's claims about Wall St. being behind Nazism are FAR STRONGER than his claims about Bolshevik revolution. Sutton can only really name Olaf Aschberg as a 'financier' with any credible evidence - an anomaly. But we have extensive and direct ties between major German industrialists, capitalists and financiers and Wall St. that are far more incriminating.
8) The view that this renders WW2 inexplicable is nonsense. The German war machine was created to loot the Soviet Union and implement a New World Order. Which it did - partially. It was the Soviets who resisted it, refusing to join Bretton-Woods and resisting the New World Order at every turn in the aftermath.
Once again, if the primary goal by the allies was the defeat of the Nazis - and not triggering war to destroy and restructure Europe as they see fit - why did they not open a second front to help the Soviets when the latter asked?
9) Hitler was indeed vocal about his opposition to international monopoly capital. The Nazi party program even included provisions to nationalize monopolies. But it didn't happen! Hitler and the Nazis were liars, trying to steal votes away from socialists and communists. The fact is, cynically, even before the final Nazi programme, pre-1932, as you can see, it was precisely international monopoly capital that was supporting Hitler.
As we see with the modern Retard Right, rhetoric and reality can not be further apart. Actions speak louder than words, and Hitler in practice was a WHORE of international finance capital! Pussy could not even nationalize IG Farben!
10) In no way does my theory rest solely on 'Hjalmar Schacht' but it is worth mentioning him - he supported Hitler and was part of the Nazi circle of friends well before it was pragmatic to do so (pre-1932). His replacement, Funk - was still a director of the BIS - maintained all connections to international finance capital and capitalists.
Moreover, Schacht was not thrown in a labor camp for having ties to capitalists - which Funk entirely maintained - but for allegedly conspiring to overthrow Hitler in 1943, after Hitler had already shit the bed. That is hardly evidence capitalists were against Hitler - it is evidence that Hitler FAILED to carry out their goals, being the incompetent, raging retard he was, who got BTFO by the Red Army.
11) Germany was not destitute because of Jews, who did not make up most of the usury class in the first place. Germany was destitute because of the ridiculous reparations exacted by Britain in order to pay back the Americans for loans. The Dawes Plan, which added private usury as as part of the architecture of this overall debt, was overseen by JP Morgan and a collection of other mainly non-Jewish Wall St. Atlanticist financial capitalists.
This debt was artifically maintained and enforced by the British, who even agreed to settling with the Americans on double the original amount. Why? Because the Atlanticists were using it as a vehicle to implement the New World Order. Jews can hardly be blamed for this on any general level.
Some mid-level Jewish hucksters in Germany in no way represented the true power of financial capitalist elites.
12) Sutton provides plenty of evidence that Hitler was backed by financial capitalists.
I can tell you didn't read the book, fucking retard, because if you did you would see it's very clear and direct. You even have evidence that the chairman of Royal Dutch Shell supported Hitler as early as the 1920's. And this evidence is supported by the fact that he was an ardent Nazi supporter in the 30's, vicious anti-Bolshevik, and his funeral was overseen by the Nazis.
13) Lend Lease was entirely neglible: 85% of it was only received in the USSR after 1943, well after the tides of war changed and Soviet victory was certain. According to historians, without Lend Lease, it would have just delayed the inevitable victory by 12-18 months. Moreover, you are not putting any of your figures into perspective.
For example, 10 billion is a huge amount - but pales in comparison to the over 33 billion Britain, which sustained far less losses and committed far less resources to defeating the Nazis - received.
6400 tanks sound like a lot, until you realize the Soviets produced 30,000 of their own in the span of a few years alone. Whatever the Soviets received from Lend Lease was dwarfed by what they were producing domestically. The idea that it was decisive for victory is a hilarious cope and myth.
The quote by Stalin you gave has no primary source - likely a fabrication. Usually Lend Lease retards quote Zhukov and Khruschev to support their claims - two anti-Stalin and pro-American subversives.
14) Stalin was a Manlet? Hitler was not tall himself. Hitler also killed himself, and Stalin conquered him and destroyed his 'reich'. What pathetic cope. Stalin was the real man, Hitler was a raging, screeching pussy who got BTFO. Stalin won, Hitler lost. It's that simple.
15) Nobody cares about Harry Hopkins wife (KEK). Why couldn't his Jewish wife secure Lend Lease arriving before 1943? Dumbass
16) Nobody cares about Sokolov. He is a bitch who provides no evidence for his claims. He just makes claims - similar to the Retard Right - with zero primary sources.
17) England did not 'lose its superpower status,' it merely transfered its shadow networks to offshore banking colonies, maintaining financial control over the US and establishing the deep state - such as the CIA via the OSS. Truman was a puppet of international bankers who quelled all of FDR's plans against them and started the cold war not on behalf of Jews but on behalf of the Atlanticist elites that FDR was fighting against.
FDR wanted to dissolve the BIS. The Atlanticists prevented it - and Truman made sure it was in intact.
18) It's not the Jews - you fucking shill - it is the capitalist class and always has been. You shill for them and will never admit the truth. Whatever Jews are in power are in power as capitalists and not as Jews.
Broke Orthodox Jews in Brooklyn have nothing to do with any real power.
COMMUNISM WINS AGAIN. 1945 ALL OVER AGAIN. THE WEST HAS FALLEN AND I JUST PLANTED A FUCKING RED FLAG OVER YOUR ENTIRE WORLD. YOU JUST GOT WRECKED FOR THE SECOND TIME, IN ADDITION TO THE L YOU TOOK DURING DEBATE.
SUBMIT TO THE KHAN, BITCH.
SOURCES FROM ANTHONY SUTTON - SINCE YOU WANTED TO MENTION HIM
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
