I keep tabs on a lot of the lawsuits filed after the 2020 election. Yesterday, I noticed a new filing in former Dominion exec Eric Coomer's defamation suit against MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell.
Coomer filed a motion for sanctions against Lindell, because Lindell has been "combative, vulgar, disrespectful, non-responsive, evasive, and consistently loud" during depositions.
They included video excerpts from the depositions with their filing.
Filing:
Docket:
And the last video - Lindell left a deposition midway through to appear on Steve Bannon's War Room.
As someone that's had their own struggles, I'd appreciate if people didn't joke about Lindell's past issues with addiction.
This is Twitter, so say what you want, but IMO addiction is serious and joking about someone relapsing is cheap and not all that clever.
Bonus: On 8/24, Lindell appeared on Steve Bannon's War Room. When Bannon asked about the deposition, Lindell said he "didn't get a very good grade" and that when Lindell asked his own lawyers "what did I get for a grade?" his lawyers replied "not good."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Elon's implying that James Gordon Meek, the journalist that plead guilty to federal CSAM charges this year, was an "expert" in Pizzagate.
The claim has been making the rounds since the summer, when a site called The People's Voice claimed that Meek "debunked 'Pizzagate'".
As far as I can tell, TPV confused James Gordon Meek, an American, with a *different* James Meek that wrote an article about conspiracies for The London Review of Books. That James Meek is British and obviously not the same person.
James Gordon Meek committed a heinous crime by possessing CSAM. Three's no excuse for his actions and I'm thank he was caught and brought to justice.
But he did not "debunk 'Pizzagate'", nor has he ever claimed to be an expert in it.
Going to bump a bunch of threads that are once again relevant after the Fulton County, GA indictments - starting with this rough accounting of events that followed the 2020 election.
A new video is making the rounds where the presenter claims to present evidence that voting machines used in the 2020 election were infected with malware.
In actuality, what they've found are antivirus definitions used by Windows Defender.
A (hopefully) quick thread..
First, some background on how anti-virus programs work.
The two primary methods used by AV to detect malware are 1) signature-based detection and 2) behavior-based detection.
Most modern AV's use a hybrid but for decades, the state of the art was signature-based antivirus.
Signature-based AVs rely on a database of signatures - or specific bits of text (I'm simplifying here) - that are unique to individual families of malware.
The AV software then scans every file on your computer to see if they contain text that matches something in the database
I took today off to play Cyberpunk, but now that Trump's amplified the ASOG Antrim report, I guess I'll just start another thread to loosely collect my thoughts on the rest of it. You can find part 1 here:
Let's go top-down. I'm working off of if you'd like to follow along. I can't guarantee that this thread will be accurate, coherent, or typo free because I've already started drinking Fernet, but I'll do my best.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/…
Quick note on my motivations: I'm a career infosec engineer. I fully acknowledge that electronic voting systems have a checkered history. But there has been zero evidence presented so far that clearly indicates this election was tampered with at scale.