When Ibn Taymiyyah wanted guidance in a specific issue of Tafsīr, he would visit abandoned Masājid, rub his face in the dirt, and say:
“O teacher of Ibrāhīm, make me understand”
Or:
“O teacher of Adam and Ibrāhīm, teach me”
al-‘Uqūd al-Durriyyah, 24-25
Ibn Taymiyyah says that doing Tasbīh with prayer beads is permissible/good (حسن)
Majmū‘ al-Fatāwā, 22/506
Even further than that, he was asked: Is there an issue of using prayer beads during prayer?
He responded:
“If the question is about counting verses, or counting repeating the same chapter —like al-Ikhlās— with a Subha, then there is no issue with it”
Majmū‘ al-Fatāwā, 22/625
Ibn Taymiyyah holds that one can gift the rewards of reading Qur’ān or Adhkār to the dead
Majmū‘ al-Fatāwā, 24/324
Ibn Taymiyyah was asked about saying “Lā Ilāha illā Allāh” 70,000 times and gifting it to the dead
He responded:
“If he does it like this 70,000 times, or more, or less, and gifts it Allāh will benefit them with it. And this has no [basis] in neither authentic nor weak Hadīth”
Majmū‘ al-Fatāwā, 24/323
Ibn al-Qayyim said:
“What to write as cure from epistaxis:
Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah used to write on his forehead:
{And it was said, “O earth! Swallow up your water. And O sky! Withhold ˹your rain˺.” The floodwater receded and the decree was carried out.} (Sūrat Hūd 44)
I heard him say: I wrote it for multiple people who were all cured.”
Zād al-Ma‘ād, 4/328
Ibn Taymiyyah did not see issue in the “Abdāl” and “Aqtāb”
Ibn Taymiyyah supporting his Fatwā by narrating a dream
Ibn al-Qayyim says:
“Our Shaykh (Ibn Taymiyyah) said:
I used to have some unsolved issues. So when I saw the Prophet ﷺ in a dream, I asked him about them, and he answered one of them with: ...”
I‘lām al-Mūqi‘īn, 5/372
In fact, Ibn Taymiyyah used to answer Fatāwā even after he died
Ibn al-Qayyim said:
“Multiple people have informed me that they saw Ibn Taymiyyah in a dream after his death and asked him questions they had issue with, to which he answered with the correct answers”
al-Rūh, 96
Ibn al-Qayyim narrates that Ibn Taymiyyah swore over 70 times that the Tatar will be defeated (before it happened), and that it is written on al-Lawh al-Mahfūdh!
Madārij al-Sālikīn, 2/458
Ibn Taymiyyah wearing the Sūfī Khirqah (cloak) and transmitting it
Ibn ‘Abd al-Hādī transmits the Khirqah from Ibn Taymiyyah, who transmitted it from ‘Abd al-Qādir al-Jilānī
Bad’ al-‘Ulqah bi Libs al-Khirqah, 2
The conclusion of Ibn Taymiyyah with regards to the issue of the Khirqah is that it is Mubāh, and if it is accompanied with a good intention it would be rewarding
Even though he concurs that there is no proof for it in the Sunnah
Majmū‘ al-Fatāwā, 11/510-511
Ibn Taymiyyah says:
“Glorifying the Mawlid could earn some people great reward from it for their good intention and glorification of the Prophet ﷺ
What is good for some people can be bad for the strong believer”
Iqtidā’ al-Sirāt al-Mustaqīm, 2/126
And just so you are not surprised how innovations can possibly occur from Ibn Taymiyyah, he himself says:
“Many of the Mujtahids from the Salaf and Khalaf have said and done what is a Bid‘ah”
Majmū‘ al-Fatāwā, 19/191
Note:
Since there are many strands of Salafism, and since they differ on what is and isn't an innovation, if you see something you don't consider an innovation, please don't give me a headache about it
You are not the intended audience, it's for the other 72 strands of Salafism
Perhaps citing their one and only authority as a final resort can knock some sense into them
Nothing else seems to be working from the Salaf or Khalaf
What's the ruling on Alawites today? My grandfather asked Shaykh Mahmūd al-Rankūsī and he replied:
-We don't Takfīr them unrestrictedly
-We judge them based on their words
-Though we know their religion is Bātinī (secretive)
-And Bātinī religions are not worth a ṣirmāyeh (shoe)
The Shaykh's answer is comprehensive and very precise
It's important to distinguish between what we call Alawites today, and historical Nusayrīs
Nusayrism is undoubtedly riddled with Kufr beliefs, but few Alawites today still believe in it
Today being an Alawite is more an ethnicity than a religion. There is no uniform dogma they all follow
Some Alawites are "normal Muslims", according to them. Possibly like lay-Sunnīs
Some of them adopted 12er Shi‘ite views
And definitely some still believe in Bātinī Nusayrism
Dr. Ibrāhīm Shāsho, the newly appointed Muftī of Aleppo, was questioned in this interview about the future plans for the Syrian Awqāf and scholarly scene as a whole
His answers will disappoint a lot of the people living in their own fantasy who were flaunting his appointment:
He says very clearly: The Awqāf Ministry will (and does) represent the entire Syrian scene, in all its components and methodologies
No group (hinting at HTS-aligned figures) will have a monopoly over it at the expense of the rest
Dr. Shāsho states: The administration affirms that Syria will be built by its own sons. And it is known to all that the Ash‘arī school is the school of the vast majority in Syria... This is the reality, and with this reality we will achieve our goal of building the new Syria
Persecution of the Syrian (Sūfī) scholarly class by the Ba‘thists 🧵
Shaykh Hasan Habannakah (d. 1978) had multiple confrontations with Hafez and the Ba‘thists
Most notably is when he gave the famous Khutbah against state-sponsored authors who were insulting Islam
He was jailed as a result then released following the outbreak of civil unrest
Shaykh Abu al-Yusr ‘Abidīn (d. 1981) had altercations with Jamal Abd al-Nasir, but also later when he was removed from his position as Muftī of Syria (for the second time) after refusing to endorse the 1963 Ba‘thist coup
A lot of people are asking about the intra-Sunni dynamics in future Syria
What will happen to the local Ash‘aris? What is the new government's own leanings? Will they force anything on the public? Etc.
I will try my best to explain it in this thread
Syria was historically always Ash‘ari (and of course "Sufi" by extension). Starting with the Seljuks, then Zengids, Ayyubids, Mamluks, and finally Ottomans
Before that was the Abbasids where we start entering into the contested zone of history which both sides claim
This didn't change after the Ottomans fell. Look no further than the undisputed Syrian authority, Shaykh al-Sham Badr al-Din al-Hasani
Shaykh Badr (himself a major figure in the Syrian revolution against the French) had a large network of students that dominated the scene
Twelver Rāfidha are not disbelievers according to the relied upon view of most scholars from the different Fiqhī and ‘Aqadī schools, and declaring them disbelievers is a weak secondary opinion
The Rāfidha are a deviant Muslim group like the Mu‘tazila, Khawārij, Murji’a, etc.
Takfīr would be carried out on a case by case basis if necessary, such as how some Ghulāt claim that Jibrīl made a mistake in announcing Prophethood, accusing Lady A’isha of Zinā, or claiming the Qur’ān is corrupted
However these beliefs are rejected by normative Twelver Shī‘a
On the issue of accusing Sayyida A’isha of Zinā, for example, the Twelvers say that the wives of all Prophets cannot fall into Fāhisha to begin with as Allāh has prevented this from even occuring