HAPPENING NOW: Ryan Zink, a Jan. 6 defendant charged with obstruction, is on the stand in his ongoing trial.
His dad ran against Ruben Gallego in the 2022 election and is running for the open seat in 2024.
The younger Zink testified that he was apolitical, disgusted by the violence he witnessed and tried to help cops that day.
Videos of him charging toward the Capitol (and up the steps) while yelling "we're storming the Capitol," among other things, were just for clicks, he says.
In 5 videos Zink — who was with his father that day — yells "they can't stop us" while surging with the crowd. "We're in the doors," he yells while the crowd breached (though he didn't go in)
His explanation today: "I'm embellishing my activity here to try to retain viewership"
Zink returned to that theme repeatedly, describing his efforts to "increase engagement" on his Facebook feed.
He also testified that his dad's candidacy influenced his inclination to act more political than he genuinely felt. His dad has been in the courtroom for the testimony.
NOTABLY Zink tried to subpoena Speaker McCarthy, Rep. Jim Jordan and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Last week, House lawyers sharply (and successfully) rejected the effort, saying the subpoena was improper and sought irrelevant info. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
MORE NOTES from the ZINK trial.
DOJ took direct aim at an effort by Zink to claim a Capitol Police officer waved members of the crowd toward the Capitol, a moment captured by a widely debunked, misleading video.
USCP Lt. John Jenkins said two of his officers, seen in the above image wearing yellow vests, had become separated from his platoon as the police fell back to the Capitol. Video shows him waving to them to get them to rejoin the line that had moved to the Capitol steps.
On cross, Zink's attorney Roger Roots argued that Jenkins' motions to the officers could have been interpreted by the rioters as permission to enter, but Jenkins rejected that claim, noting that he was angled away from the bulk of the crowd and clearly toward his officers.
Roots pressed Jenkins on why he didn't point or hold up a hand to signal to the rioters (who had already breached the police line) not to stop.
Jenkins: "My concern was the two officers ... I had spent a good chunk of time trying to stop them, sir."
Jenkins recounted how he and an outnumbered platoon attempted to hold back the crowd around the time Pence's motorcade was relocating. Eventually, the crowd forced its way through the bike racks and the officers retreated to the steps to consolidate their line.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That opinion by the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel remains on the books and binds federal agencies (like DOJ and the FBI) from complying with the House’s impeachment-related subpoenas without a formal vote. politico.com/news/2023/09/1…
Trump’s OLC issued that opinion just as his 2020 impeachment trial (Ukraine) was beginning, and he used it to shield himself from claims he had obstructed the House inquiry. politico.com/news/2023/09/1…
JUST IN: Just left. Courtroom Leo BOZELL, the son of prominent conservative media critic Brent Bozell, was found guilty of 10 charges related to breaching the Capitol on Jan. 5 — including obstruction and assault
Judge Bates delivered the verdict while Bozell’s family looked on.
In issuing the bench trial verdict, Judge Bates said Leo Bozell’s testimony was “simply not credible.”
Bozell pushed past police lines and entered the Capitol, after smashing two windows with a metal object. He was also convicted of two counts of destruction of govt property
He later surged to the Senate floor and, while there, forced a C-Span camera to face the floor so it wouldn’t capture rioters’ movements.
In run up to Jan. 6 he texted associates about desire to “take the Capitol and hang those pedo-satanistic traitors.”
The special grand jury's recommendations were not binding, and the report shows some significant dissent on the call for indicting Graham, Loeffler and many of the false electors.
HAPPENING NOW: Judge Mehta is reading instructions to the jury in the NAVARRO contempt of Congress case. That will be followed by closing arguments and then deliberations. Conceivable we could have a verdict early this afternoon.
AUSA Elizabeth Aloi: "Our government only works when people play by the rules and it only works when people are held accountable when they do not. When a person intentionally and deliberately chooses to defy a congressional subpoena, that is a crime."
WOODWARD begins by emphasizing that the defense basically agrees with the government's facts but accuses the government of leaning into harrowing details of Jan. 6 to stain Navarro.
NEW: John Eastman, testifying in his disbarment trial, invoked “attorney-client privilege” tonight when asked about Trump-world chatter that Chuck Grassley might preside on Jan. 6.
Asked who holds that privilege, Eastman replied: “President Trump.”
In a long day of testimony. Eastman described his relationship with Ken CHESEBRO, who he said wrote a paragraph and changed some words in his infamous two-page memo re Pence’s power.
Eastman also said he had little to no contact with Chesebro prior to late-December 2020 — well after the Dec. 14 elector meeting — and that he never saw Chesebro’s newly unearthed Dec. 6, 2020 memo until this week.