2/ The report also included a Recent Arrivals analysis, indicating positive migrant contributions over a 10-year period (typically ages 27-37)
This is misleading as it doesn't cover future costs. Unsurprisingly, this what the media ran with rather than the -£114bn over 1995-2011
3/ Another study used a static & dynamic analysis approach
The static analysis (using current data) showed that while EEA migrants are positive contributors, non-EEA migrants perform significantly worse than natives despite having a far lower average age
4/ The 'dynamic analysis' is a prediction model which counts migrant children as natives and claims 'a large share' will return to their homelands in old age.
Any honest person can understand how this is a hugely misleading way to predict the future impact of migrants
5/ So which migrants will return to their homelands?
Data from the UK and Norway both show that economically productive migrants are the most likely to return and predictably, the least productive are the least likely to
ONS data shows that overall, all non-white group categories were net beneficiaries in terms of taxes paid and benefits received and migrant groups from these areas have the highest rates of child benefit, disability benefit, and social housing
7/ The top 10 migrant nations for social housing are non-EEA, with 72% of Somalians, 41% of Jamaicans & 37% of Ghanaians living in social housing.
In London, a city known for its high real estate prices, 51.7% of the Black population lives in social housing
8/ When it comes to employment rates, natives have the joint highest while Pakistani/Bangladeshi score the lowest
11/ This map shows the net contribution of 1st generation migrants in Holland
The report concludes that the total net costs of immigration averaged €17 billion per year and between 1995–2019, the total costs amounted to €400 billion
12/ In Denmark, the total net contribution in 2018 by native Danish people was +41 billion DKK. The contribution of immigrants and their descendants was net negative at -24 billion DKK
However, non-Western migrants perform worse by a considerable measure
18/ In Finland, the average Iraqi migrant (aged 20-24) costs €844k if they choose to have children, costing €1.27 million more than the average Finnish-born family
Worse still, a single Somali immigrant costs the Finnish state almost €1 million
22/ To conclude, targeted immigration could be economically beneficial, however current immigration policy is evidently a negative for European nations.
2/ For those that are unaware, the caste system is a hierarchical division of society into four main varnas: Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras.
Higher castes consider lower castes to be impure, and thus rules are in place in order to stop 'caste pollution'
3/ An example of such rules was untouchability
Fixed distances of separation were set down, in multiples of six paces.
For instance, a Nayar/Nair (Kshatriyas) could remain within 6 steps of a Nambudris (Brahmin), and a Pulayan slave would have to keep ninety-six steps distant.
The same trend is found for average household income, we see Indians top the charts whereas Pakistani and Bangladeshi households are the least productive for the economy
This report concludes that the total net costs of immigration averaged €17 billion per year. Between 1995–2019, the total costs amounted to €400 billion
This thread from @kareem_carr is a truly woeful rebuttal to a meme which highlights the disproportionate nature of interracial violence & the media's bias in its reporting
Let's debunk the very few claims this 'Data Scientist' provides🧵