New paper in @PsychScience! 🚨 Here's the one-minute version. ⏱️ There are two cities in Iran. One has water, so it has gardens, grapes, and the famous Shiraz wine.
Then there's Yazd. Yazd is bone dry.
Yazd has a reputation for restraint, thrift, hard work, and strict religion. Shiraz is known for poetry, art, enjoying life, and wine. 🍷
My co-author Hamid wondered, is that a coincidence, or is there a climate connection here? Water scarcity encourages long-term thinking? So we tested college students in Yazd and Shiraz with surveys on indulgence and long-term orientation.
Bingo! Dry Yazd = long-term thinking is important. Rainy Shiraz = indulgence is important.
But are these just things people say, or is this really in people's behavior? We posted an ad for a long-term stable job and ad for a fun, flexible startup on Divar (Iran's version of Craigslist).
Then we waited for resumes to come in. Shirazis were attracted to the startup job, and Yazdis were attracted to the safe, stable job (despite similar levels of wealth in the two cities). So it seems real!
But is this just an Iran story? Iran's a dry place. Maybe water is more important for people's psychology there? To the World Values Survey! 🦸♂️
In countries with a history of more plentiful water, people value indulgence more...
...and thinking for the long term less.
But what about confounds? Water scarcity predicts long-term orientation even after taking into account lots of potential confounds, like wealth, education, and religion.
So cultures' history of water scarcity shapes their psychologies, but that got us to thinking about climate change. Water is changing drastically right NOW.
So we tested it! We brought students to the lab and showed them articles about climate change. One predicted more dire water scarcity. The other predicted more plentiful water.
After reading about water scarcity, people rated long-term thinking MORE important and indulgence LESS important. The opposite happened after reading about plentiful water.
Maybe this is a shred of hope for humanity in the face of climate change? Our brains seem to respond instinctively to water scarcity with exactly the sort of mindset we'll need to fight climate change.
These results are another piece of evidence on how cultures seem to be adapted to our long-term historical environments.
I hope we'll be increasingly using that adaptive mindset to respond to the changes in our environment now.
The paper is now out in Psychological Science. Much credit to Hamidreza Harati. It's great to see psychological theory starting based on experiences outside the US! journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
I flubbed the graph here! 😬 Here's the indulgence graph.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I know publishing is biased against null findings, but it's WILD to me that reviewers and editors felt comfortable saying it out loud! Here's what I experienced. @OSFramework @ChineseOpenSci bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bj…
About 30 years ago, an influential study came out finding that people in Hong Kong are "bicultural." researchgate.net/publication/31…
They meant that people in HK have cognitive styles common in both East Asia and the West. (Like in @MichaelMorrisCU and Kaiping Peng's research.)
How do psychologists test whether people are bicultural? The method goes back to the 90s. It’s simple. Show people pictures that represent cultures, like China...
How do psychologists test whether people are bicultural? The method goes back to the 90s. It’s simple. Show people pictures that represent cultures, like China...
"I" = individualism, "we" = collectivism? New data suggests we should STOP using this measure. 🛑
@NaturePortfolio @HSScommsnature.com/articles/s4159…
Backdrop: Many studies have counted up the use of “I” versus “we” in books or social media posts to measure individualism (“I”) and collectivism (“we”). Here's one example.
Unstable relationships make people happy?? 🚨 New study 🚨published in the @APA journal Emotion: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
A truism in psychology these days is that relationships are the key to happiness.
And to be sure, lots of data supports that! Just one example: A classic study of “very happy people” found that ALL very happy people had good social relationships.