New paper in @PsychScience! 🚨 Here's the one-minute version. ⏱️ There are two cities in Iran. One has water, so it has gardens, grapes, and the famous Shiraz wine.
Then there's Yazd. Yazd is bone dry.
Yazd has a reputation for restraint, thrift, hard work, and strict religion. Shiraz is known for poetry, art, enjoying life, and wine. 🍷
My co-author Hamid wondered, is that a coincidence, or is there a climate connection here? Water scarcity encourages long-term thinking? So we tested college students in Yazd and Shiraz with surveys on indulgence and long-term orientation.
Bingo! Dry Yazd = long-term thinking is important. Rainy Shiraz = indulgence is important.
But are these just things people say, or is this really in people's behavior? We posted an ad for a long-term stable job and ad for a fun, flexible startup on Divar (Iran's version of Craigslist).
Then we waited for resumes to come in. Shirazis were attracted to the startup job, and Yazdis were attracted to the safe, stable job (despite similar levels of wealth in the two cities). So it seems real!
But is this just an Iran story? Iran's a dry place. Maybe water is more important for people's psychology there? To the World Values Survey! 🦸♂️
In countries with a history of more plentiful water, people value indulgence more...
...and thinking for the long term less.
But what about confounds? Water scarcity predicts long-term orientation even after taking into account lots of potential confounds, like wealth, education, and religion.
So cultures' history of water scarcity shapes their psychologies, but that got us to thinking about climate change. Water is changing drastically right NOW.
So we tested it! We brought students to the lab and showed them articles about climate change. One predicted more dire water scarcity. The other predicted more plentiful water.
After reading about water scarcity, people rated long-term thinking MORE important and indulgence LESS important. The opposite happened after reading about plentiful water.
Maybe this is a shred of hope for humanity in the face of climate change? Our brains seem to respond instinctively to water scarcity with exactly the sort of mindset we'll need to fight climate change.
These results are another piece of evidence on how cultures seem to be adapted to our long-term historical environments.
I hope we'll be increasingly using that adaptive mindset to respond to the changes in our environment now.
The paper is now out in Psychological Science. Much credit to Hamidreza Harati. It's great to see psychological theory starting based on experiences outside the US! journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
I flubbed the graph here! 😬 Here's the indulgence graph.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do cities make people WEIRD? The answer we found conflicts with what most people think. We tracked 1,400 teenagers as they moved across China—some to giant cities like Shanghai, others to small towns like Zhoukou, Henan. bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bj…
We tested their cultural thought style right when they moved, again after one semester, and then after three years.
In our thought style test, students categorized objects. Two belong to the same abstract category (train – bus). Two share a functional relationship (train – tracks).
This study took us years and years, and it's finally out! 🥳 Here's years of our life in 60 seconds. 🚨 @BPSOfficial @AlexEngPsych @liuqing_wei @Tongrongtianbpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bj…
Here's the conclusion first: Kids in China aren't farming much these days (shocker!), but they're still learning rice-wheat ways of thinking.
We tested about 1,400 students’ thought style as they moved to college across China.
How much of mask use in China was forced? We tracked this by observing real mask use in 2020 versus 2023, four months after China lifted its zero-Covid policy. journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
There are lots of surveys asking people during the pandemic if they wore masks. But some people lie. Or they exaggerate.
So my research team stared at people in public, stomached the social awkwardness, and counted the real-life mask use of over 23,000 people across China.
We gave ~7,000 people a simple work task in two Western, individualistic cultures (US, UK) and three more collectivistic cultures (China, South Africa, Mexico). The task was like a captcha.
We established an explicit contract. We're paying you to complete 10 images. After that, you can stop, and you'll still receive full pay.
When the star leaves, do bench players shine or fade? Fun new study on talent and culture. (Yes, fun in the Journal of Corporate Finance! Trust me!) @JCorpFin sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Here's the setup. Researchers tracked how accurate stock analysts in China were at predicting companies' earnings per share from 2007 to 2023.
They searched for "stars"--analysts who were voted as the top five in any year. The "bench players" were analysts in the same companies as those stars.
I know publishing is biased against null findings, but it's WILD to me that reviewers and editors felt comfortable saying it out loud! Here's what I experienced. @OSFramework @ChineseOpenSci bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bj…
About 30 years ago, an influential study came out finding that people in Hong Kong are "bicultural." researchgate.net/publication/31…
They meant that people in HK have cognitive styles common in both East Asia and the West. (Like in @MichaelMorrisCU and Kaiping Peng's research.)