SDL Profile picture
Sep 14, 2023 15 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Every time the Eternal Voting Discourse returns, I hear the same argument for leftists to vote 3rd party:

"Both parties are the same. Blue or red, nothing changes."

That's wrong. Dems are better than Reps on nearly every issue, but fail progressive goals.

Graphs below:🧵
QUEER RIGHTS

The strongest leftist case for Democrats is on queer rights.

Take gender-affirming care for trans youth.

2/3 of Rep states have banned it in the last 2 years -- all of which are currently halted in courts.

1/2 of Dem states have legally protected it. 🧵 Image
QUEER RIGHTS

It's not just healthcare.

On virtually every queer issue -- spousal rights, visitation, discrimination, bullying, adoption -- Dem states are absurdly far ahead of Rep states.

Gay rights on left, trans rights on right: 🧵
Image
Image
ABORTION RIGHTS

After the Supreme Court (6R, 3D) ended Roe v Wade, every single Republican state which *could* ban or heavily restrict abortion did so.

(The rest have a state constitutional right to abortion.)

7/8 of Dem states have actively protected access to abortion. 🧵 Image
DRUG WAR

Every single Dem state has decriminalized or fully legalized marijuana.

Just 2/5 of Rep states have done so.

Biden recently asked DEA to reschedule marijuana from Class I to Class III (less illegal). He had promised to fully decriminalize it, but has not done so. 🧵 Image
MASS INCARCERATION

Dems are less progressive on criminal justice.

The median Rep state incarcerates 8 people in 1,000, about 10x higher than the median rich country.

The median Dem state incarcerates 4 in 1,000, still 5x higher, and has slightly lower violent crime rates. 🧵
Image
Image
WORKING CONDITIONS

Dems are also less progressive on economic issues.

For example, Dem states have much higher minimum wages than Rep states -- but not one reaches 50% of a living wage.

Only Dem states have paid family leave -- but only 1 in 3 do! 🧵
Image
Image
WORKING CONDITIONS

It's almost comical how much better Dem states do on OxFam's index of Best States to Work In.

But much of that is just because Rep states are so bad for workers -- even strong Dem states fall short of European countries (and far short of social democracy). 🧵 Image
UNIONIZATION

For example, take "Right to Work" laws, which destroy unions' ability to collectively bargain with employers.

7/8 of Rep states are RTW -- making them worse than any Euro country.

7/8 of Dem states are not -- but that's a very low bar! 🧵 Image
UNIONIZATION

About 2/3 of European countries have mandatory or widespread sectoral bargaining, where the union contract covers an entire economic sector.

Zero US states do.

Just 5 have wage boards, which CAN serve a similar role -- but only New York has recently used it. 🧵
Image
Image
HEALTHCARE

Nearly all countries on Earth have a public option (good) or single-payer (better) healthcare system.

Zero US states have single-payer.

Just 3 have *started* a public option program -- and all contracted private firms instead of building a public-owned insurance! 🧵
Image
Image
What do we learn from this?

First, Dems are much better than Reps.

If you want more queer rights, abortion rights, drug decriminalization, decarceration, worker protections, or union rights:

You want Reps to lose, badly.

The parties are not the same. It's not even close. 🧵
Second: Voting Dem is not enough.

Even strong Dem states fail basic progressive goals.

If you want to re-unionize America, healthcare for all, or even just paid sick leave:

You need to replace centrist Dems with progressives, through realignment or ranked-choice voting. 🧵
We need a mass movement that can make demands & remove those who refuse, to pull politics left.

Just voting -- whether for Dem or Green or [Tiny Socialist Party] -- builds nothing.

Vote for the leftmost viable candidate (likely a Democrat) and then get back to organizing. 🧵
For the first time in decades, that movement has started to form.

There were 15,000 organized socialists in 1990. Today, there are 120,000.

Unions are more aggressive now than any time since 2000.

Let's build social democracy in America -- and more. 🧵 act.dsausa.org/donate/members…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SDL

SDL Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SocDoneLeft

Mar 12
The idea that "atheists only have subjective preferences, because objective morality only exists with God" is extremely funny.

It's been 2400 years, and theocratic theists have yet to give a single good response to the Euthyphro dilemma. Image
This is Hobbes' response: Might makes right.

Who cares if God is arbitrary? As absolute ruler, he has "irresistible power", and you must kneel.

But we reject this for weaker tyrants with smaller arbitrary demands. Why accept it from the strongest tyrant?
If God "reveals morality through his character", then morality is independent of God. He transmits moral law. Back to horn 1.

If God's character alone determines what is moral, then morality is arbitrary. He sets moral law as he pleases. Back to horn 2.
Read 18 tweets
Feb 5
The Nazis privatized dozens of state-owned enterprises. In fact, that's what "privatization" was coined to describe.

The Nazis wanted to place all political & economic power in the hands of a small group of loyalist rich elites & state oligarchs. And so they did. Image
The Nazis crushed unions. (They created a single, state-controlled one that never struck and never demanded higher wages.)

The Nazis dramatically expanded wealth inequality (right) while barely raising real wages (left).

Which party does that sound like? Image
Image
Conservatives never seem to understand: Leftists want **equality of power**.

Big government (or small) is just a means to an end. That end is isonomia -- equal power over society -- which we today call "democracy".

Why should Musk have 400 billion times more power than you do? Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
For good and bad, the world was on demographic track for a Long American Century.

At current growth, fertility, & immigration levels: The US would be the ONLY world power with exponential total GDP growth by 2100.

If Trump ends birthright citizenship, he ends that trajectory. Image
"America First" types ignore how immigration makes the USA stronger: It makes us bigger!

Remember when Japan was going to take over the world? Japan never stopped growing more productive -- it just stopped growing more populous.

Without immigration, the US would be shrinking. Image
All the world's geniuses want to move here.

Trumpists would turn them away -- and lower innovation, lower growth, lower population, weaken the USA -- all to please mediocre White racists that can't intellectually compete.

Trumpists are genuinely too stupid to run an empire. Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 3, 2024
New blogpost:

Socialists will overwhelmingly vote for Kamala Harris. 🧵 Image
Most polls only let voters identify as "liberal", "moderate", or "conservative". To know how socialists will vote, that's worthless.

Last month, University of New Hampshire added "socialist" to their list.

About 90% of socialist likely voters will vote for Kamala in ME, NH, VT: Image
The same rate holds across the US.

In August, Fairleigh Dickinson University also added "socialist" to their ideology list.

The result? Again, about 90% of self-identified socialist registered voters will vote Kamala. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jun 9, 2024
The "American College of Pediatrics" (ACPeds) posted another report against trans healthcare.

You're going to hear a lot about ACPeds from social conservatives, like Fox News and Jimmy Dore.

Anyone who seriously cites the ACPeds is a hack. Thread: 🧵
Image
Image
In 2002, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published a report documenting that gay & straight parents had similar outcomes for their children.

Conservatives got pissed. They created the "American College of Pediatrics" (ACPeds) to oppose gay marriage and gay adoption. Image
Down to its name, the ACPeds was an obvious attempt to launder conservative schlock as if most medical professionals supported it.

The ACPeds took every standard conservative position:
- Against gay marriage
- Against abortion
- For beating children
- For sexual abstinence Image
Read 9 tweets
May 17, 2024
This shit drives me up the wall:

Both anti-electoral leftists AND anti-leftist contrarians like Wu ignore that progressives in blue states have created public health insurance options!

2 already have them (WA CO) and 4 passed laws authorizing them (NV ME MN NM). Image
Progressives and leftists didn't "stop thinking about universal healthcare" -- in half a dozen states, we took the first step toward UHC in half a century!

Come on, man!

Image
Image
The 3 earlier plans are neoliberal: Public-funded but private-run.

They are mild successes. They reduced the real cost of health insurance. They haven't come CLOSE to universal healthcare.

The 3 new plans are slated to be bigger, public-run, and integrated with Medicaid:
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(