More from @Inversionism

Inversionism

@Inversionism

Sep 2

Cult of the Medics - Chapter 1 of 8

This is one of the most impactful and eye opening documentary series ever made in my opinion. It's very long when all chapters are combined, but it's well worth the watch if you want help attaining a better understanding of the occult and esoteric roots of our medical system and the people behind it's inception.

People love to think that science is a separation of religion or spirituality, but that could not be further from the truth. Modern science was birthed in the occult, and still bathes in it in the shadows.

When you think about how vaccines are made, what is your first impression? Take the polio vaccine for example and think of it in the context of some witch in the forest concocting some brew.

First kill some monkeys, extract the kidney, chop up the kidney into small bits, and mix it with calf serum (blood from a fetus), and put it in a jar to rot at 37C for days.

After it's been fermented for long enough and the medium is exhausted, you then take blended/ground up nervous system and brain from a young child that "died from polio" as the "virus" sample, and mix it with the rotted kidney and calf blood.

It then decays for several more days, doing what they call "culturing" or "growing" the virus, before they filter it through multiple layers of ASBESTOS, and then injected into various animals for "safety testing".

Then they "inactivate" it by mixing that disgusting mix of death and rotted tissue from both monkeys, humans, and calf fetus, with formaldehyde for 2-3 days.

Then it's bottled and injected into human beings, including children.

If that isn't some death cult witchcraft occult ritual, I don't know what is.

Now watch this documentary series and learn the true nature of modern medicine.

Cult of the Medics - Chapter 2 of 8

Cult of the Medics - Chapter 3 of 8

Read 10 tweets

Inversionism

@Inversionism

Aug 27

If you or your child is being pressured by your doctor, school, or whoever into getting a vaccine of any type, use this book as your weapon of defense and argumentation.

It's the magnum opus textbook on vaccines and autoimmunity that I think is severely underutilized and valued in the vaccine truth community. The amount of references you can garner from this one text is incredibly powerful for making your arguments for why vaccination is a horrible practice from the jump, and it's especially great in pleading your case to doctors to get medical exemptions for school or elsewhere.

In part 1 called "mosaic of autoimmunity", it discusses the role of adjuvants, experimental models used to justify the use of adjuvants, underlying mechanisms, ASIA syndromes from excessive exposure to adjuvants like aluminum, etc.

In part 2, it has studies on autoimmune conditions induced by specific vaccines, so if you or your kid already have a diagnosis of X autoimmune condition, you can use this book to argue for why you should get a medical exemption as vaccines can greatly exacerbate it.

In part 3, it goes really deep into the autoimmune conditions solicited by vaccination, like lupus, vasculitides, arthritis, connective tissue diseases, alopecia, aluminum biodistribution and biopersistence, thrombocytopenic purpura, type 1 diabetes, narcolepsy, celiac disease, encephalomyelitis, chronic fatigue, skin disorders, and several others.

It has the greatest detail on the mechanisms of harm possible with vaccines and will help you further understand how egregious and fraudulent it is to be using adjuvant laden cocktails as a "control/placebo", or even another vaccine that was deemed safe with the same reified fraudulent practices.

It's a must read. Links below.

Full book.

If you want to purchase the hardcover to wield at in-person discussions (affiliate link. it's expensive AF. Better off downloading and printing it off lol)

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.10…
sci-hub.st/https://online…
amzn.to/3YU0D11

Here is a good amazon review for it and how it helped someone make their doctor accept vaccine refusal.

Like I said. Wield the knowledge in this book like a weapon.

Read 4 tweets

Inversionism

@Inversionism

Aug 25

Watch Siri question Plotkin in regards to the Gardasil vaccine study where they used a substance called AAHS in the control group, which is an aluminum adjuvant. Siri gets him to admit it's not inert - meaning that the Gardasil vaccine, like every other vaccine, was not adequately safety tested before mass administration and it's recommendation to young girls, and now even young boys.

The best paper on this fraud is by Dr Peter Doshi titled "Adjuvant-containing control arms in pivotal quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine trials:
restoration of previously unpublished methodology" Links in comments below.

This paper assembled a cohort of five RCTs described as placebo controlled by Merck and others, and found that the control was reported as a placebo, when it was not. This control contained what's known as AAHS, amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate.

Across all these sources, it was reported as a placebo, and nor was it mentioned in any trial registry entry, but it was mentioned in the publications and clinical study reports. In 3 of those 5 trials, the consent forms that people signed described the control as an "inactive substance", which aluminum IS MOST DEFINITELY NOT, especially when injected.

3 trials said their reasoning for this as the control was "to preserve blinding and assess the safety of HPV virus-like particles as the ‘safety profile of (AAHS) is well characterized" - when it the trial is supposed to analyzing the safety of the vaccine as a whole in comparison to an inert placebo.

This is yet another example of how criminal corporations like Merck lie and intentionally manipulate their control groups to ensure that the pseudo=placebo groups have a similar adverse event rate as the vaccine group, so they can claim safety comparatively and get approval. It's just fraud, full stop. No debate.

The scale of harm was confirmed in a 2017 peer reviewed study that found evidence of numerous adverse events reported after these vaccines, with severe autoimmune conditions, permanent disabilities, many hospitalizations, and even some died. These trials were done on young teenage girls and of course Merck didn't attribute any of the deaths of severe adverse events to the vaccine, because they happened in the "placebo" too... UNREAL.

Meanwhile we have continual articles being pumped out by the pharma captured MSM right now denying that the HPV vaccine is harmful amid the massive swath of lawsuits, and even articles pushing for young boys to get the shots now too

Words cannot adequately describe just how criminally evil these corporations, news organizations, and government officials are allowing this to continue.

Saline is the only acceptable inert substance to discern the safety of a vaccine. No more adjuvant cocktails with aluminum, polysorbate, or any other toxin. No more vaccines as the control either.

IT HAS TO BE SALINE OR GTFO.

Thank you to @AaronSiriSG @delbigtree @HighWireTalk @ICANdecide for all that you do and this illuminating deposition.

Here are the papers mentioned.

Adjuvant-containing control arms in pivotal quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine trials: restoration of previously unpublished methodology

Serious adverse events after HPV vaccination: a critical review of randomized trials and post-marketing case series

Aluminum adjuvants of vaccines injected into the muscle: Normal fate, pathology and associated disease

Amorphous Aluminum Hydroxyphosphate Sulfate (AAHS) from @ChildrensHD

"Studies have found 100% of the intramuscularly injected aluminum vaccine adjuvant is absorbed into the systemic circulation and travels to different sites in the body such as the brain, joints and the spleen where it accumulates and is retained for years post-vaccination."

@AaronSiriSG @delbigtree @HighWireTalk @ICANdecide Here are some images to show the fraud in clearer detail, and 2 documentaries on aluminum that you should watch to learn how toxic it is, especially when it's injected.

rumble.com/v38cyyx-the-ag…
rumble.com/v38crg8-inject…

Read 5 tweets

Inversionism

@Inversionism

Aug 23

Have you seen the NASA Future of War document?

This was a presentation from the Chief Scientist Dennis M Bushnell at the NASA Langley Research Center in 2001, where he discusses future strategic issues and future warfare, circa 2025. Langley....CIA?

Given we are just a couple years from this supposed date, what better time to share one of the most wild, terrifying, and ominous documents I've ever seen. What's more concerning is that a SPACE AGENCY, NASA, is producing such content like this. If you know the history of NASA, you'd know operation paperclip.

Isn't it weird how often everything ties back to the JFK assassination and operation paperclip? Almost as if it was a coup and the US merged with mad scientist lunatics for world domination.

For those of you who think it's fake, it was published directly on the DTIC military website, along with a schedule where it's referenced. The presentation from Bushnell was not video or audio recorded, but we have the slides. I'm sure if there was video or audio evidence, it would be one of the most horrifying lectures of all time.

The 4th Annual Testing and Training for Readiness Symposium & Exhibition: Emerging Challenges, Opportunities and Requirement

Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

The primary reason why I find this document so unsettling, is not only because it was given in 2001, but Bushnell from the jump tells you that it "is based in all cases upon existing, data/trends/analyses/technologies (e.g. NO PIXIE DUST)", meaning this is real technology the military already has, and it lists all the agencies that he had involved. See image 1. He's explicitly telling you that this stuff is REAL and the government/military and corporations are actively pushing for such a horrifying future.

In image 2, he talks about the need to "plan differently" now, because the world is in the process of a IT/Bio/Nano technological revolution, and we're advancing in scales of months instead of decades.

He then refers to "spaceship earth", where he lists the crew (humanity, the people, etc) as plundering the ship's supplies, tinkering with the temperature and life support controls, and INCREASING the size of the crew by 2 million per week. There is the population overgrowth narrative again...

As you get further into the document, it gets more and more horrifying. There is discussion of AI nanobot smart dust that is inhaled into the lungs, bores into lung tissue, and "executes various pathological missions". He calls it a wholly new class of weaponry which is legal. HOW IS THAT LEGAL?!?

He also discusses microwave weapons for behavioral control and altering brain function, the use of bioengineering fungi/prions/parasites and other substances as "fingerprintless" bio archipelago, like these are going to be the repertoire of death and war.

Here are some written excerpts. I'll upload some additional images in the comments below.

The first one I want you to see is what they consider "apparently legal" weapons ofo war.

What is Apparently “Legal”

• Microwave/RF Anti-Functional and AntiPersonnel Weaponry

• Chemical Anti-Functional Weaponry • Chemical “Psychological Effects” via Sensory Organs Weaponry (e.g. smell)

• Chemical Personnel Incapacitation Weaponry [“Non-Warfare” (e.g. Hostage/Terrorism) only]

• PSYWAR

• Acoustic Weaponry

• Mechanical Micro Dust

Humans Have “Taken Over” and Vastly Shortened “Evolution”
• Of the Planet
– Global Warming/Pollution/Deforestation
– Huge “Public Work” (e.g. 3 Gorges Dam)
• Of the Human Species
– Genomic Design and Repair
– “Mind Children” (Moravec)
• Products/Life Forms
– Cross Species Molecular Breeding
– “Directed Evolution” (Maxygen etc.)

U.S. “HUMAN BRAIN PROJECT”

• Begun in early 90’s, funded by 16 organizations across 5 agencies (NIH, NSF, DOD, NASA, DOE)

• AKA “Neuroinformatics” (intersection of neuroscience and informatics)

• “Exploding field;” 10,000 individual presentations at annual meeting of Society for Neuroscience (from molecular geneticists to cognitive psychologists)

• Determining detailed neuroanatomy of human brain (“digital brain atlas”) • Use of IT to study brain, use of brain info to aid IT/AI

Inexpensive Motivational Asynchronous Web-Based Distance Education Enables:

• Demise of the U.S. “underclasses”

• Wealth Creation from enabled “Invention” • Stabilization of World Population

• [Even More] Rapid Technology Diffusion • Equalization of “Haves” and “Havenots”

• Altered Political/military outlooks Worldwide - I.E. Changes “Everything”

The “Ultimate” Education Approach

- Plug and Play Direct Silicon (or other such) device connection to brain, (very rapid) uploads, Education in minutes instead of (many) years

Of Particular Concern
Uncontrolled/Uncontrollable SELF-REPLICATION Of
- Brilliant Robots (IT)
- Nano-Replicators (Nano)
- Rampant Recombinant Bio

(Sample) New(er) Sensors

• Lidar w/ 50% efficiency via S-C optical Amplifiers, Also Fempto-second Lasers

• Molec./Bio Sensors • Nanotags • Smart Card Sensors

• Sensors implanted during Manuf./Servicing

• Nano IR (10E-6 Sensitivity) • Smart Dust

Some Sensor “Swarms”

• SMART DUST
– Cubic mm or less
– Combined sensors, comms and power supply
– Floats in air currents

• NANOTAGS
– Placed on everything/everywhere
– Identification and Status Info

• Co-opted INSECTS

Micro Dust Weaponry

A Mechanical Analog to Bio, Micron sized mechanized “dust” which is distributed as an aerosol and inhaled into the lungs. Dust mechanically bores into lung tissue and executes various “Pathological Missions.”

A Wholly “New” class of Weaponry which is legal.

Read 6 tweets

Inversionism

@Inversionism

Aug 20

The first case of autism and the smallpox vaccine

Some credit Leo Kanner as being the first to describe what's known today as autism, back in 1943. The video shows the typical autistic symptoms with the head self harm, stimming, resistance to change, isolation, etc. This is the only clip I could find of Kanner anywhere, so if anyone has the BBC report this video was originally apart of, please share.

After doing some digging, I found a document written by Kanner that has a very interesting admission in it.

On page 9 and 10, it says the following.

"Richard was born on Nov 17th, 1937. Pregnancy and birth were normal. He sat up at 8 months and walked at 1 year. His mother began to train him at the age of 3 weeks, giving him a suppository every morning "so his bowels would move by the clock". The mother, in comparing her two children, recalled that while her younger child showed an anticipatory reaction to being picked up, Richard had not shown any physiognomic or postural sign of preparedness and had failed to adjust his body to being held by her or the nurse. Nutrition and physical growth proceeded satisfactorily.

Following smallpox vaccination at 12 months, he had an attack of diarrhea and fever, from which he recovered in somewhat less than a week"

This is where we have to learn about how the smallpox vaccines was made, and you can find that on the LSU doc on page 5/6/7.

This process is so horrific, barbaric, and completely insane, that I'm dumbfounded that ANYONE can look upon this time in history and think it's a good show for vaccination. None of this is science. It's disgusting levels of barbarism and it's no wonder so many people became ill in the late 1800s and early 1900s.

Let's review. I will be doing a SS article on this as well with more detail.

--------------------------------------------------------
Harvest:

The skin was rinsed with warm water, with or without soap, and the pulp was scraped from the skin with a curette, one form of which was made by sharpening the edge of a hemispherical stainless-steel spoon (Plate 7 .1 B) . If the animals were killed, exsanguination before scraping ensured a less blood-stained product; if they were not killed, they were usually anaesthetized before scraping. Harvests from individual animals were kept separately in sterile containers closed tightly enough to prevent drying by evaporation, and stored below 0 °C except when being processed.

Seed virus used for inoculation

With a procedure that had been in use in many countries for over a hundred years, and with no effort at international standardization, it was not surprising that the strains of virus employed for vaccination in different countries differed in their biological properties . The choice of a particular strain was arbitrary, being based on the history of the vaccine production laboratory concerned . An examination of the situation in 1967 showed that many different strains were then in use.

Since different strains of vaccinia virus vary considerably in their biological properties (see Chapter 2) and since the properties of the viral strain were probably important in determining the differences found in the rates of occurrence of postvaccinial encephalitis in different countries (see Table 7 .8), this was not a trivial matter. However, no steps were taken to recommend internationally which vaccinia strain should be used for vaccine production until after 1967, although some countries in which postvaccinial encephalitis had been a serious problem had changed their production to the less pathogenic Lister strain before this.

Preparation of Liquid Vaccine

Traditionally, the vaccine pulp was processed so as to remove some of the extraneous material and reduce the bacterial count, and it was then dispersed as a liquid suspension called vaccine lymph.

Clarification of the vaccine pulp

The semisolid pulp was usually ground into lymph by comminuting it in a grinder, or later by homogenization in a blending machine . For this purpose it was usually mixed with 40-60% glycerol. Storage of the glycerolated homogenate at low temperature over a period of months led to a steady fall in the number of viable bacteria, but it was later found that the same result could be more rapidly achieved by the addition of phenol (see below) . Periodically bacteriological tests were made to determine when the lymph was suitable for distribution.

Use of glycerol

The introduction of glycerol to "stabilize" the vaccine virus and at the same time prevent bacterial multiplication was regarded as a major step forward in lymph production . This procedure made it feasible to change from arm-to-arm vaccination or the use of an itinerant vaccinated cow (see Chapter 6, Plate 6.12) to the distribution of liquid vaccine in capillary tubes.

Glycerol had three advantages : it acted as an antibacterial preservative, it helped to make the vaccine stick to the skin, and it permitted the maintenance of the vaccine in liquid form at -10 ° C and thereby ensured the long survival of active vaccinia virus.

Use of phenol - Insanely toxic

The bacterial count in glycerolated pulp stored in the refrigerator fell off very slowly . Several months were usually required before it was low enough to allow the vaccine to be issued for use, and repeated testing was necessary during this period . The procedure could be greatly accelerated by adding phenol to a final concentration of 0.5%, a procedure originally recommended by Gins (1924) and Lehmann (1937) and popularized by McClean (1949), whose protocol was as follows : Material harvested from the sheep was ground with twice its weight of a 1 % solution of phenol in distilled water . After this had stood at 22 °C for 48 hours, glycerol, equal in amount to the phenol solution, was added, so that the final concentration of phenol was 0 .4%.

Continuing in comments below.

Development of Freeze-dried Smallpox Vaccine

"In my field experiments I compared the stabilities of the glycerinated and lanolinated vaccines in current production ; although the latter was the more stable at 22 °C, it completely lost its potency within a month at 37 ° C. I then tried Otten's method of drying crude vaccine from the liquid state over sulphuric acid ; vaccine made in this way was widely used in Indonesia and some batches had survived at ambient temperatures for remarkably long periods. There was however considerable batch-to-batch variation, a finding that I confirmed ; furthermore, the bulk dried vaccine was cumbersome to handle and distribute into ampoules.

"Without further ado I then started to explore the possibilities of drying from the frozen state, using a large centrifugal dryer of the type that had recently been invented by R . Greaves at Cambridge . This machine was made in the Institute's workshops and although primitive in appearance, it worked very well ; the main difficulty was the making of vacuum-tight seals, at that time rather more of an art than a science.

"After much experimentation, a satisfactory method was devised for purifying animal vaccine and freeze-drying it after adding peptone to a concentration of 5 % . Vaccine thus prepared consistently maintained its original potency for at least three months at 37 'C ; in later experiments, batches stored at the high temperature of 45 °C still gave 100% successful primary vaccination after four years . The criterion for the permissible minimum content of vaccinia virus was fixed by determining the amount of virus needed to achieve 100% successful vaccinations ; the final step in the development stage was the devising of a simple and safe method for reconstituting the dried vaccine in the field . It then remained only to scale up all the processes to a point at which full production could begin ; this was accomplished by 1953/"