I’m watching the Trump MTP interview online. His first answer about why he wants to run for president is fascist. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Humiliation, invasion, corruption, violence. I alone can fix it. 🥺
Asked about his "retribution" plan he claims that the January 6th domestic terrorists are political prisoners.
You can't let Trump talk on tv and also fact check him or reign in his lies and distortions. His whole "reality" is layers upon layers of lies. It's honestly a waste of time.
He lives in a very dark fantasy world. So does the whole rightwing media audience. It's a real shame.
As an interviewer you try to get Trump to specifically answer a question, but he tells 20 lies in the process and you can't stop each of those 20 lies--esp if you focus on the one question you're trying to get an answer. (it's called a "gish gallop" by old timey propaganda folks)
He's trying to sound reasonable in vocal tone while saying insane things. It's a confusing mismatch.
I'm not sure who the audience is for this interview. I assume MTP viewers are high information voters. Highly engaged/high information voters in the reality based community would see through his lies. Low information voters wouldn't know better, but they're not watching this.
Fascism throughout the interview. He calls himself a hero, a martyr. Everything is corrupt, according to him. He is the only truthteller, according to him, the only one who has common sense & wants what is good for the nation.
Consuming fascist propaganda like this makes you even more vulnerable to fascist propaganda. It is engineered/designed to create the conditions under which fascism flourishes. You cannot put Trump on tv without normalizing fascism in America.
ad hominem, tu quoque, conspiracy, lies, false accusations of corruption, attacking the interviewer, frame warfare--every response he gives is an evasion. He will never answer your questions to your satisfaction. You cannot hold him accountable. You just can't.
Trump using anchoring (they like me, we're the same) to talk about his relationship with fascist leaders while also claiming that he wants peace is the kind of rhetorical trick that confuses the brain and makes it difficult to understand what he actually believes.
Whew. He ends the way he started with a fascist "I alone can fix it" appeal.
What happened in this interview was not persuasion, it was propaganda. Using propaganda instead of persuasion is a sign of fascism. Fascism is for losers because if they had good arguments they would make them. They don't, so they do what Trump did here. What a loser.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I would like to make an argument that Trump is taking a "great man" approach to the presidency. What does that mean? 😱 I'm afraid that it is not good. 🧵
First, Hegel: “The great men in history are those whose own particular aims contain the substantial will that is the will of the World Spirit. They can be called heroes, because they have drawn their aim and their vocation not merely from the calm and orderly system..."
"An elderly man, pale and weak in mind, body, and morals, stands on a stage in front of an adoring crowd. He appears before them in disguise—orange make-up and dark bronzer attempt to give his pale skin a color that suggests youthfulness."
"A cotton candy-like confection of bright blond hair-stuff covers his head, suggesting an angelic vitality. His voice is loud, he talks rough, suggesting strength and a powerful toughness. His suit is tailored to cover up his aged and deformed body."
"Shoe lifts give him height but also make him tilt forward awkwardly—and clumsily. His loyal audience doesn’t see with their own eyes but with his. Likewise, they don’t hear him with their own ears. They hear only what he wants them to hear."
Things I've seen that show me people still don't get what 2024 is about:
"We've already seen what Trump is like as president, it will be like that."
"He can't do that."
If Trump wins, his 2nd term won't be anything like his first. It will be much worse. Laws won't stop him.
Democratic erosion scholars call this "competitive authoritarianism"--it's the way that most democracies go authoritarian now--coups with the veneer of still being democratic:
I've tried to explain this before: Trump thinks he was too nice the last time he was president. He's pissed that his generals & staff prevented him from doing what he wanted while president, made him leave the WH when he lost. He wants unlimited power.
WARNING: anyone thinking of paying anyone to vote a certain way OR anyone accepting money to vote a certain way is violating 18 US Code 597 and will be punished with fines and/or two years in jail.
Like, just FYI. There are actual laws against accepting money for votes.
Reminds me of when I teach political campaigning and we talk about GOTV strategies and I have to tell my students that there are actual laws and most of their ideas for getting folks to vote are illegal.
Here are three explainers that might be helpful for thinking about why Trump's Big Election Lie worked on his followers, why they still believe it, and why even this mountain of evidence may not change their minds.
One of the biggest weaknesses of fascist leaders is they refuse to listen to advice. They’re afraid of appearing weak. They don’t want to acknowledge that other people know more than they do. They’re cognitively irresponsible, they want the authority to declare reality.
One thing you learn when you become an expert in something is how little you know compared to how much there is to know. When you speak to a lot of experts you learn how many other things there are to know and how impossible it would be to be an expert in more than one thing.
Subject matter experts are valuable, we’re much smarter together than we are in isolation. Autocrats never want to admit that. They treat experts as threats to the autocrat’s authority (they are) & try to punish experts or force them to comply with the authoritarian’s “truth.”