🧵
If opening an impeachment investigation into whether the President, while he was Vice President, participated in, at least, influence peddling, based on authenticated documents, bank records, and statements from named people is not the hill to die on, then there is no hill.
For those in the GOP Establishment, from elected officials to those running the party to members of the commentariat, this is it. This is your final chance to prove that there is, in fact, an actual hill upon which to die figuratively. Because this is as serious as it gets.
I will repeat, there are already bank records, corporate documents, testimony from sources named publicly as well as sources known to Congress, emails authenticated by at least one person, authenticated text messages, admission of attendance at dinners and on calls. This exists.
Additionally, these are allegations of specific wrong doing, namely bribery and influence peddling. These are specific allegations for which there is already evidence. The hill is hilling. Absent a check to Joe Biden saying re: bribe, what else do you need as a predicate?
Nearly all of the base does not live in the Eternal Now. We have memories that are capable of reaching back into the far away and long ago days of 2017-2019 when Trump was accused of being an agent of Russia going back to the 1980s based on evidence that we were assured existed.
We know how this story ends. Claims that an impeachment investigation is pointless because there is no chance of conviction in the Senate and, hey, don't you care about the 2024 election results, come on, be an adult, Move On Dot Org are just another this isn't the hill to die on
It has been nearly 30 years now that each and every time there is something that is a matter of actual importance, the base is told that this isn't the hill to die on. Pick what drives your blood pressure up most, I'll go first. The power of the purse has been de facto repealed.
For nearly 30 years now, whenever the GOP has control of the House, the base is told that, nope, can't use the power of the purse, that would risk the GOP majority and then the Dems will do so much worse and is that what you want, the Dems to ram through whatever they want?
A power not used is a power that does not exist. How about the "debt limit" and I can't even type that without laughing. 31 USC 3101 has been repealed, it's just that Congress doesn't have the nerve to do so directly, that would look bad, after all. It's just done de facto.
Since the debt limit will always be raised, there is, in practical effect, no debt limit. Can't die on that hill though, you simpletons. That would result in the military not getting paid. DO YOU WANT SOLDIERS TO STARVE? YOU WANT SOLDIERS TO STARVE! Not that hill either.
Then there's the Obamacare repeal debacle and I can spike my blood pressure only so high. For nearly 30 years now, each and every time there is a matter which requires even a modest amount of fortitude by the GOP Establishment, the response is not this hill, but totes the next.
There is never the next hill. Not The Hill To Die On has been the mocking response for well over two decades. And now here we are. The greatest hill of them all. There is beyond ample circumstantial evidence from identifiable sources and authenticated documents of corruption.
If it is not worth risking, and it is a risk, not a certainty, the GOP's electoral chances in 2024 over this, there is nothing worth that risk. Next to declaring war, an obligation which Congress utterly refuses to do, impeachment is as serious as it gets.
If this is not the hill on which to die, then there are no hills. Now, my position on this has been consistent since, say, the early 2000s. The GOP Establishment does not think there are hills and therefore there is nothing upon which to die. So at least this is consistent.
I just want honesty. I want statements, direct and forthright, that all that matters is staying in power, not the use of that power for anything remotely resembling actual results. Be honest. Because what's happening now and has been happening for decades is anything but that.
The Dems will be worse stopped being an effective bit of emotional blackmail last century. If what is going on with Biden and corruption is not worthy of risking a majority, then nothing is. Just be honest. That's it. Be honest and accept the consequences. Have a red panda. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵
Okay, since someone mentioned in reply to my thread on the Granholm road trip that it appears there was a circuitous route taken, I went looking for the itinerary and let's just say that was an exercise in frustration. I did find this list of cities.
So over the course of four days it was Charlotte to Columbia, SC to Athens, GA to Atlanta, GA to Chattanooga, TN, to Murfreesboro, TN to Memphis, TN (which sounds like someone's SEC bucket list trip but I digress). So let's look at those distances.
The mileage is generic start in city A end in city B from Google maps. Charlotte to Columbia SC is 95 miles and and hour and a half or eleventy billion, depending on traffic. Let's go with an hour and a half. Was there a stop to recharge after that?
🧵
You know what, I'm going to go at this one by one because this is ticking me off on a purely learn to argue level. So let's go through this part by part, shall we?
1. Define some. What percent of that 24 billion is staying in the US? Cite, specifically, the amount.
Is it also being argued that this old gear would not have been replaced? If the old gear would need to be replaced at some point, which logic dictates it would, is there current capacity to do so and, if not, wouldn't the plants have to have been built/upgraded anyway?
Again, define some. Also, 50 years ago was 1973. Geopolitics has changed an itty bitty tiny bit, barely noticeable, during that time, to say nothing of technology. Also, where, with specificity, will Ukraine get the money to pay for the upkeep?
🧵
Good morning and welcome to Twitter Law School. Today's topic is what is a docket, what are filings, how are filings made to a docket on the Federal level, what must be redacted, and what is done when a redaction isn't made. Get your caffeine conveyance of choice and let's go
A docket is the list of what documents and exhibits have been entered of record in a case. Of record means that a party submits or a judge enters a document into the docket as an official part of the proceedings. The docket is the official listing of all those documents.
Note that documents does not mean just documents, these can be videos, audio recordings, photographs, etc. For ease of reference, those are all referred to as documents. A docket is a chronological entry of all of those submitted documents. Those are called filings.
Good morning and welcome to Twitter Law School! Today's topic is how facts are found in court, what appellate courts do with those facts, what stipulations are, why they are important, and how stipulations won 303 Creative. Get your caffeine conveyance of choice and let's get it.
American jurisprudence involves applying the law to the facts of the case before the court. Thus, it is very important to establish what the facts of the case are. Facts are decided at the trial court level, either by jury or, in non-jury matters, by the judge.
Facts are decided at the trial level because the trial level is where live testimony is presented and, as a result, the trial court finder of fact can best determine credibility. Even video testimony doesn't convey all nuances. Also, objections are handled by the trial court.
For what it's worth, here's what I think about the remaining SCOTUS cases. I'll say what I think and then what I want. Get your caffeine conveyance of choice and let's get it.
303 Creative - Yes, yes, technically this is a compelled speech case but, c'mon, it's a religious freedom case. I have absolutely no idea how this is going to go though my guess is that Roberts will do everything he can to avoid having to rule directly on the issue.
My WAG is that it will be a 5-4 decision in favor of 303 Creative on narrow compelled speech grounds. That is an utter WAG, I have no clue. What I want is a very robust opinion by Thomas benchslapping into the center of the Sun the idea that gay marriage trumps religious freedom
Good morning and welcome to Twitter Law School. Today's topic is why are there all those different terms to describe a SCOTUS opinion, what does it matter, and how to play Count The Judges, a fun game for the whole family. Get your caffeine conveyance, you're going to need it.
There are two things that SCOTUS decides when reaching a decision: who wins and why that party wins. The who wins matters to the parties. The why matters for precedent. Determining the why can be anything but straightforward. Welcome to vocabulary time.
Opinion of the Court: what it says on the tin. The opinion of the Court is the opinion that is being handed down by the Court. It is this opinion that bears greatest precedential weight. It can be anything from unanimous to a plurality opinion.