We @citizenlab w/TAG's @maddiestone caught #predator spyware attacks against a prominent pro-democracy Egyptian politician after he announced presidential ambitions.
4/ This kind of exploit delivery through injection DOES NOT require a target to click as our collaborator, the brilliant @maddiestone, points out in her post.
@maddiestone @billmarczak 7/ Ahmed ElTantawy wasn't just targeted with network injection!
He was also targeted with #Predator spyware links in decoy messages sent as texts & over @WhatsApp.
One of the attacks masqueraded as communications from the International Federation for Human Rights @fidh_en
@maddiestone @billmarczak @WhatsApp @fidh_en 8/ This summer the 🇺🇸US hit developer & distributor of #Predator spyware (Cytrox & Intellexa) with blacklisting.
This latest abuse revelation affirms the determination that the spyware continues to fuel human rights abuses.
NEW: @WhatsApp caught & fixed a sophisticated zero click attack...
Now they've published an advisory about it.
Say attackers combined the exploit with an @Apple vulnerability to hack a specific group of targets (i.e. this wasn't pointed at everybody)
Quick thoughts 1/
Wait, you say, haven't I heard of @WhatsApp zero-click exploits before?
You have.
A big user base makes a platform big target for exploit development.
Think about it from the attacker's perspective: an exploit against a popular messenger gives you potential access to a lot of devices.
You probably want maximum mileage from that painstakingly developed, weaponized, and tested exploit code you created/ purchased (or got bundled into your Pegasus subscription).
3/ The regular tempo of large platforms catching sophisticated exploits is a good sign.
They're paying attention & devoting resources to this growing category of highly targeted, sophisticated attacks.
But it's also a reminder of the magnitude of the threat out there...
WHOA: megapublisher @axelspringer is asking a German court to ban an ad-blocker.
Their claim that should make everyone nervous:
The HTML/ CSS code of websites are protected computer programs.
And influencing they are displayed (e.g by removing ads) violates copyright.
1/
2/ Preventing ad-blocking would be a huge blow to German cybersecurity and privacy.
There are critical security & privacy reasons to influence how a websites code gets displayed.
Like stripping out dangerous code & malvertising.
Or blocking unwanted trackers.
This is why most governments do it on their systems.
3/Defining HTML/CSS as a protected computer program will quickly lead to absurdities touching every corner of the internet.
Just think of the potential infringements:
-Screen readers for the blind
-'Dark mode' bowser extensions
-Displaying snippets of code in a university class
-Inspecting & modifying code in your own browser
-Website translators
3/ What still gives me chills is how many cases surfaced of people killed by cartels... or their family members... getting targeted with Pegasus spyware.
The #PegasusProject found even more potential cases in Mexico.