I've started digging in to the Helpful Content Update.
Some findings so far (🧵)
The most heavily impacted category appears to be online tools like calculators, converters, alarms, etc.
While most "tool" sites exist to make money off ads, some have much better UX than others.
Next is "information" sites, like definitions, city data, meanings of colors, etc.
What do they have in common? It's obvious:
They're scraping publicly available data, re-hashing it in their own way, and blasting ads all over the place. The UX is often terrible.
Not helpful.
Next are the "lifestyle" sites, like horoscopes, meanings of numbers, self improvement, motivational quotes, etc.
There are *so many* sites like this. You can't pretend to be "helpful content" with overwhelming ads, fake/missing authors, spammy SEO headlines, too much content...
Next is travel. I will need to write an entire post about this one. So much to say.
Yes, undeserving sites got hit.
But the patterns among the biggest declines are overwhelmingly obvious. This. Is. Not. Helpful. Content.
As a woman who travels constantly, I dislike all of it.
This may be a hot take, but because so many other sites have ruined it, I'm not going to trust your travel advice unless you can show me actual pictures YOU took of your travels.
If this is too hard for you to do, maybe a travel blog isn't the best fit.
I have so many more opinions and so much more data to share, so watch this space.
But so far, to me, many of the biggest drops seem warranted, and I think this update was needed.
But hopefully Google tweaks things so the legit, undeserving blogs get their visibility back.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I believe that the future of SEO will be highly tied in with influencer marketing. Hear me out:
More and more SERP features are highlighting individual experience. Short videos. Perspectives. Knowledge graphs. Author carousels. Testing author names in Top Stories. 🧵
It’s pretty clear that there is a strong connection between social media signals and performance on Google, particularly in Discover.
I know Google has said social media isn’t a ranking factor, but the correlation is strong, time and time again.
This is especially true for YouTube, which Google seems to be incorporating directly into more and more organic results.
A video with tons of engagement on YouTube often gets to land top positions in search. Even more so now, with Perspectives.
I see a lot of posts like “why would people work at SEO agencies when they could…”
I’ll give you a few answers and share my experience, as someone who has been agency-side for 12 years:
🧵
Being on a team is amazing.
Aside from the career benefits, being on a team provides social comradery, collaboration, the ability to learn from one another every day, and in many cases, lifelong friendships.
But career-wise, I literally couldn’t do what I (we) do without them.
On our team, we have experts in all areas of SEO and digital marketing.
We are over 30 people now, and the amount of knowledge we collectively share is second to none.
Every day, they teach me something I didn’t know before, and approach things in ways I never considered.
One challenge with using ChatGPT to come up with new article ideas is cross-referencing your site's existing articles to see if you've already written that content.
Here's one approach I've been using... it's not entirely scientific but it gets the job done🧵
You can ask ChatGPT to try to identify the most logical, high-volume, commonly searched phrase a searcher might type to find the article.
Yes, ChatGPT doesn't actually *know* search volumes, but it does a good job of guessing the best phrase with the right prompt:
If you aren't satisfied, you can always ask it to provide more serach queries, or otherwise refine the queries in whatever way you need:
Because the whole world is hiring SEOs right now, here's a quick thread with some tips about hiring the right (intermediate) SEO for your business and not getting burned:
(FWIW, hiring has been a big part of my role for 9 years now, so I think I've seen it all... good and bad😝)
The SEO you hire should have specific experience for YOUR type of website.
Are you a news site? The SEO should have news/publishing experience.
If 1 SEO is expected to handle everything, they need both technical and content experience specific to news sites (G News, Discover)
Are you an e-commerce site?
Look for candidates with hands-on e-commerce experience, whether it's Shopify, Magento, Woo-Commerce.
E-commerce SEO is its own animal with a steep learning curve.
Pretty interesting to think about how Google and Facebook handled/continue to handle the threat of misinformation in completely different ways.
I’ve been saying since day 1 that the rise of E-A-T seems to be Google’s method of reducing fake news and misinformation.
(thread)
Google’s emphasis on E-A-T grew rapidly after the 2016 U.S. election and after egregious examples found by @carolecadwalla and others that their algorithms were surfacing dangerous misinformation (h/t @randfish for his MozCon talk on this topic several years ago)
E-A-T continues to be a cornerstone of Google’s communications across various products (search, News, Discover, YouTube, Product Reviews, images)
Not saying Google is perfect (at all), but Facebook seems to have largely ignored the opportunity to implement something similar…