Michael Shellenberger Profile picture
Sep 27 3 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Fauci said he had an "open mind" about Covid's origin, but he didn't. A new, months-long investigation by Racket and Public reveals that Fauci secretly lobbied the CIA, State Department, and White House to reject the theory that Covid came from the Chinese lab his agency funded. Image
Fauci Diverted US Government Away From Lab Leak Theory Of Covid’s Origin, Sources Say

Fauci allegedly attacked lab leak theory at meetings at CIA, the State Department, and the White House

by @mtaibbi @galexybrane & @shellenberger
Dr. Anthony Fauci (C) speaks as US President Donald Trump listens during a press conference on COVID-19 in the Rose Garden of the White House on March 13, 2020, two days before the publication of the “Proximal Origin” paper dismissing the lab leak theory of Covid’s origin. (Photo by Chen Mengtong/China News Service via Getty Images)

The former director of the U.S. National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who led the U.S. government’s response to the coronavirus pandemic, visited CIA headquarters to “influence” its review of COVID-19 origins, the House Oversight Committee reported yesterday.

Last month, Committee Chair Brad Wenstrup made headlines when he revealed that seven CIA analysts “with significant scientific expertise" on the agency’s Covid-19 Discovery Team (CDT) received performance bonuses after changing a report to downplay concerns about a possible lab origin of the virus.

Now, a months-long investigation by Racket and Public, which included interviews with the CIA whistleblower behind last month’s revelations and others in a position to know, reveals that Fauci not only visited the CIA but also pushed the controversial “Proximal Origin of SARS CoV-2” paper, published by Nature Medicine, in meetings at the State Department and the White House.

Previous reporting already showed that Fauci “prompted” the “Proximal Origin” paper, according to its authors. Lead author Kristian Andersen expressed grave doubts about the natural origin theory even months after Nature Medicine published the paper. And they described themselves as pressured by “higher ups,” referring to individuals in the White House and other government agencies.

Now, the new information from multiple sources, including a CIA whistleblower, a senior government investigator, and a senior official, suggests a broad effort by Fauci to go agency-by-agency, from the White House to the State Department to the CIA, in an effort to steer government officials away from looking into the possibility that COVID-19 escaped from a lab.

“Fauci’s expert opinions were a significant consideration and were part of our classified assessment,” said the CIA whistleblower, a decorated and long-serving CIA officer with expertise in Asia. “His opinion substantially altered the conclusions that were subsequently drawn.”

Fauci had reasons to push scientists and intelligence analysts to believe the virus had a zoonotic origin since his agency had issued a grant to fund research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China.

The Wenstrup press release noted that the whistleblower’s information suggested Fauci was escorted in “without record of entry.” According to the CIA whistleblower, the CIA purposely did not “badge” Fauci in and out of the building so as to hide any record that he had been there.

“Fauci came to our building, to promote the natural origin of the virus,” the CIA whistleblower said. “He knew what was going on. I mean, you see all the redacted documents that are coming out. He was covering his ass and he was trying to do it with the Intel community… I know he came multiple times and he was treated like a rockstar by the Weapons and Counter Proliferation Mission Center. And, he pushed the Kristian Anderson paper."
Image
Please subscribe now to support our investigative reporting and to read the rest of this blockbuster new story!

x.com/shellenberger/…
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Shellenberger

Michael Shellenberger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shellenberger

Sep 25
When a UFO whistleblower told Congress in July that the government had retrieved alien spacecraft and "biologics," many dismissed his claims. But now, dozens of whistleblowers have given testimony to Congress, the Pentagon, and the IC Inspector General corroborating his claims. Image
Dozens Of Government UFO Whistleblowers Have Given Testimony To Congress, Pentagon, And Inspectors General, Say Sources

Despite the growing number of UFO/UAP whistleblowers, leaders the military and intelligence community are fighting greater disclosure

by @shellenberger @PhoebeThinking & @AndrewMohar8

Thomas A. Monheim, nominee for Inspector General of the Intelligence Community speaks at a hearing with the Senate Select Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill on July 20, 2021, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

In August, shortly after U.S. government UFO whistleblower David Grusch gave testimony to Congress about crashed spacecraft and alien “biologics,” many observers wondered how much credence to put in his testimony. After all, Grusch is just a single individual. The other two individuals who testified before Congress were former Navy pilots who said they had no evidence of a government program to retrieve and reverse-engineer spacecraft of exotic and apparently nonhuman origin.

But at least 30 other whistleblowers working for the federal government or government contractors have given testimony, or a “protected disclosure,” to the Office of the Intelligence Community Inspector General (IC IG), the Defense Department Inspector General (DOD IG), or to Congress over the last several months, according to multiple sources interviewed by Public.

When told that whistleblowers had come forward to share information similar to that shared by Grusch with Congress, Mick West, a prominent skeptic of UFOs, said, “It'd be very interesting. You know, more people saying the same thing independently makes it more likely to be true.”

And yet the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, Thomas A. Monheim, on September 15 appeared to deny, in a letter to Congress, that his office was investigating these claims. Monheim said that his office “has not conducted any audit, inspection, evaluation, or review of alleged UAP programs within responsibility authority of the DNI that would enable … a fulsome response.”

But the way Monheim worded his response suggests he gave himself some wiggle room. Matthew Pines, a civilian intelligence analyst, noted last week that “the official taxonomy for IC IG activities includes: ‘audits, investigations, inspections, and reviews.’ Is it curious that an ‘investigation’ is not denied?... The Investigations Division is structurally separate from the Audit and Inspections & Evaluation Divisions.”

The fact that dozens of whistleblowers have come forward is not evidence of extraterrestrial life nor of a government conspiracy to cover up a retrieval or reverse-engineering program. And not all of the whistleblowers may be reporting evidence of UAPs. Some may simply be reporting illegal or unethical behavior related to UAP programs.

But the sources, who asked to remain anonymous and are all in a position to know, told Public that, in addition to the whistleblowers reporting wrongdoing, between 30 to 50 government employees or contractors have gone to the DoD’s All-Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to offer testimony about UAPs.

“Some witnesses/whistleblowers are coming forward directly to AARO, some to the DOD IG, some to the IC IG, and some to Congress,” said Nick Pope, a UAP expert who worked on the issue for the UK’s Ministry of Defense.

Many have speculated as to whether Grusch and other UAP whistleblowers or witnesses might be part of a US government disinformation campaign.

A former US Air Force intelligence officer working at Kirtland Air Force Base in the 1980s through to the first decade of this century admitted to British journalist Mark Pilkington and others that he spread disinformation about UFOs with the aim of misleading civilian UFO investigators in order to cover-up both US military as well as nonhuman technology programs.

But, experts interviewed by Public say it is unlikely that people waging a disinformation campaign would do it through the Office of the Inspector General since doing so puts individuals at risk.

“Considering the broader context, to include Grusch’s allegations, previous reporting by Public, and the extraordinary legislation working its way through Congress,” said Marik von Rennenkampff, a former Pentagon appointee under the Obama administration, “I find it hard to believe that so many individuals would open themselves up to significant legal jeopardy by willfully lying to inspectors general.”

Knowingly giving false testimony to the IC IG is punishable by fines up to $ 10,000, imprisonment for up to five years, or both. If found guilty of lying to Congress, Grusch would face up to five years in prison.

At the same time, the history of past government disinformation campaigns in general, and as they specifically relate to UAPs, involves the mixing of accurate information and inaccurate information, making it difficult or impossible to feel confident in understanding the meaning of fundamental elements of the phenomenon.

That reality and the need to prevent government officials from deliberately misleading journalists, policymakers, and the public make greater transparency and disclosure essential, both UFO skeptics and believers agree.

“It’s either that dozens of highly cleared officials are in the grip of an enduring, bizarre delusion, are witting participants to a broad scale and long-running psychological deception,” said Pines, “or they are relaying factual information on extraordinary covert programs.”

Said West, “I can understand why people would think ufology is frivolous and a waste of government money, and we shouldn't be looking into it. But they don't think we shouldn’t release the secret information about crashed alien craft, you know, something everybody wants to see.”
Image
Please subscribe now to support Public's groundbreaking reporting and to read the rest of the article!

x.com/shellenberger/…


Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 23
San Francisco was a longtime world leader in pioneering love, respect, and freedom for women. Now, the city is synonymous with psychopaths and misogynists, claiming to be "trans activists," violently attacking women's rights advocates. @buttonslives Image
Psychopathy And Misogyny Behind Trans Attacks On Women

Another violent assault on women in San Francisco, home to the women's rights movement

by @buttonslives

People in San Francisco and California have long prided themselves as global leaders in the movement for the respect and freedom of women. California was, in 1911, the sixth and largest state to give women the right to vote, proving decisive for national victory. In 1955, four lesbian couples founded the Daughters of Bilitis, the first national lesbian activist organization in the U.S. And between 1968 and 1970, progressive women’s rights groups met in San Francisco, giving birth to the modern feminist movement of the following decade.

But that commitment to respect and freedom for women was nowhere to be found last week when a group of six masked trans activists dressed in black climbed over a locked gate and aggressively pursued two women’s sex-based rights advocates, K. Yang and Meghan Murphy, in downtown San Francisco. The two women were speakers at the Women’s Declaration International (WDI) USA's second annual convention. The terrifying event was captured in a video.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the women’s rights campaigners were anti-trans. “Anti-trans group, advertising as feminists, descends on S.F. for an annual convention,” read the headline of an article it published on its homepage. The WDI, according to the Chronicle, was pushing "anti-trans policies.” The Chronicle quoted an organization claiming that WDI members were “bigots masquerading as feminists” and linked them to organizations labeled as hate groups.

But neither Murphy nor Yang is anti-trans, and both are women's rights advocates in the same tradition of the women’s suffragists and other progressive women’s movements. Yang is a lesbian and former trans activist, and Murphy is a long-time campaigner against the sex trafficking of women and other feminist causes.

Murphy was terrified by the attempted assault. In the video, she had to flee to the safety of the hotel. “I've never felt such fear,” she said. “I've never had to flee from someone, let alone a group of intimidating men. Their intentions seemed hostile, possibly even violent."

Initially, three officers from the San Francisco Police Department were present, anticipating the planned protests. Then, as the number of trans protesters grew to around 100, additional officers from multiple districts arrived, totaling around 20. Police chased and detained one activist who vandalized property.

Murphy had intended to attend the opening night of an art exhibit presented by Women Are Real, an independent non-partisan organization advocating for women's sex-based rights, but said, “After the day's events, I was too scared to step out.”

The next morning, the art exhibit attendees discovered that the venue's windows had been spray painted with the antagonistic phrase, “NO TERFS ON OUR TURF!” TERF is a derogatory term for feminists who do not think a man can become a woman through drugs, surgery, or mentality.

It wasn’t the first violent assault on women’s rights activists in San Francisco. Earlier this year, activists reportedly physically assaulted Riley Gaines, a female champion college swimmer, and prevented her from leaving a dangerously crowded room at San Francisco State University.

Trans activists chanted slogans and held signs with aggressive messages. “Millions of dead TERFs,” read one sign.

The events shocked many San Francisco residents, including many women. The violence raises the question: what in the world is happening to San Francisco? How did the city go from celebrating women’s rights to assaulting women?
Image
Please subscribe now to read the rest of this important investigation by @buttonslives !

x.com/shellenberger/…

Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 18
The wind industry says it isn't killing whales, but it is. New boat traffic is colliding with whales. And high-decibel sonar is separating whale mothers from their calves, sending them into harm's way. Our new documentary, which lays out the evidence, is now free to watch.
This ground-breaking documentary could save the North Atlantic right whales from extinction. Please consider getting involved and making a donation to support our work. LFG!!!

saverightwhales.org
The mainstream news media is lying about this. Why? Because the wind industry paid them millions of dollars to.

x.com/shellenberger/…
Read 6 tweets
Sep 18
Experts say we must switch to renewables to save nature, but wind turbines are doing the opposite, killing endangered North Atlantic right whales, hoary bats, bald and golden eagles, and threatening Brazilian pumas and jaguars with extinction.

wsj.com/world/americas…
"Jaguars and pumas are facing extinction in the Caatinga, Brazil’s northeastern shrublands, as Europe and China pour investment into wind farms, puncturing the land with vast turbines that are scaring the animals away from the region’s scant water sources."
"Particularly sensitive to changes to their habitat, the jaguars and pumas abandon their lairs as soon as construction work on the wind farms begins... They then roam vast distances across the dusty plains in search of new streams and rivers. The weakest perish along the way."
Read 8 tweets
Sep 15
Politicians around the world say hate speech is rising, but it’s not. People have never been more tolerant. The politicians are lying because they want to censor their critics. And so we’re fighting back. Tomorrow, I’m proud to speak out with my friends in Dublin, Ireland. LFG!!!
What’s behind the global crackdown on free speech? Narcissism, a taxpayer-funded Censorship Industrial Complex, and George Soros.

Here are the receipts:
If Jonathan Swift, James Joyce, and Oscar Wilde were still alive, Ireland’s Justice Minister @HMcEntee would order the police to invade their homes to look for hate speech.
Read 13 tweets
Sep 12
The government says there's no proof the wind industry is killing whales, but there is. Researchers have now caught the wind industry using high-decibel sonar, as loud as a jackhammer, which is causing mothers & calves to separate, flee into boat traffic, and die. Image
Here's the letter from @LinowesLisa to @NOAA . It was sent September 8. We contacted NOAA and gave them additional time to respond to us. They never did.


Image
Image
Image
Image
@LinowesLisa @NOAA We can save the whales from extinction, but not without your help!

Get involved! Support the movement!

saverightwhales.org
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(