NEWS: Here's the highlights of Elon's roundtable with Jewish leaders discussing X, free speech, Antisemitism and the recent ADL controversy.
🧵
Elon started by pointing out views on Antisemitic content are down >>30% since the Twitter acquisition.
Elon: Multiple third parties, using full data sets, have also concluded the same that impressions on Antisemitic content is down.
Elon challenges anyone who claims the opposite to provide evidence.
Elon points out that Walter Isaacson, who apparently is Jewish, spent 2 years following Elon and speaking to his contacts. Walter didn’t find any evidence Elon is Antisemitic.
Elon also says he first visited Israel when he was 13.
Shapiro: Where do you draw the line on hate speech like Antisemitism?
Elon: There isn’t an easy answer. One person’s free speech is another person’s hate speech.
Elon: We start with the obvious slurs and no-brainers, and then the operating principle is to follow the laws of the country we’re in. That’s more free in the US, but laws are different in other countries.
Elon: The best way to combat hate speech is to hear it and then explain why it’s not true, rather than someone harbouring those views opinions and never hearing a rebuttal.
Elon: We do a lot of foolish things at X, some have been in place for 10 years, and we can’t fix everything at once. E.g there’s a list of “bad words”, not safe for advertising, which needs to be trimmed.
Elon: The list includes words and terms that are Antisemitic in nature. If a post contains those, it can be deboosted in the algorithm. However, there is also value in not being draconian, because it can encourage people to change their minds.
Elon: Advertisers are very skittish. One article in a medium sized newspaper can be enough to scare an advertiser away from spending on X.
Elon: Some advertisers are less sensitive than others. There should be degrees of advertiser safety. There should be different costs - there could even be advertising next to NSFW posts, but the advertising per impression will be cheaper than next to safe content.
Shapiro: What does “freedom of speech, not freedom of reach” mean?
Elon: We’re trying to deal with this algorithmically. If we show people content that makes them want to leave X and hammer them with hate speech - they won’t like that.
Shapiro: How can X resist government influence?
Elon: Our policy is to deny government censorship to the extent allowed by law. In the US, most of the pressure comes from far-left activist groups that often act in concert.
Shapiro: What do you think about Russel Brand getting demonetized?
Elon: It should be innocent until proven guilty until a conviction.
Elon: We’re trying to make X into a force for good for civilisation - this was the goal of the acquisition. Prior to the acquisition, it was increasingly a negative force for civilisation.
Elon points out he was fully aware that acquiring Twitter was financially dubious and he could lose money. He also says he was aware he’d get a lot of flack.
Elon: It would have been deluded to think acquiring Twitter would be an easy way to make money and not attract criticism.
Elon: The goal isn’t just to stop hate speech, but to increase positive speech.
Israeli ex-president @PresidentRuvi: Where do you draw the line on Anti-semitism?
Elon: We’re open to ideas. Maybe we’re not drawing the line in the best place right now, but it’s not terrible.
@AlanDersh points out X needs to be fair to both left and right.
Elon: Before the acquisition, Twitter was very left leaning and had its thumb on the scale. In moving towards a system that is more inclusive, that is technically moving right - but in reality moving to the centre.
Elon: Our goal is to look back in 10 years and say X is a positive force for civilization. Think we’re making progress towards that. But it’s important to have a critical feedback loop.
We recommend listening to the full Space which is over 2 hours and covers many more topics including faith, Elon's upbringing and being "aspirationally Jewish", politics, education, international relations and Middle East peace, and much more.
NEWS: FBI and White House coerced social media platforms into removing posts, appeals court rules.
It also said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention likely violated the First Amendment, though its actions were "not plainly coercive."
According to the appeals court, the agencies are forbidden from taking actions "formal or informal, directly or indirectly, to coerce or significantly encourage social-media companies to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce, including through altering their algorithms, posted social-media content containing protected free speech”
NEWS: Walter Isaacson on what he saw at X/Twitter HQ as Elon took over last year.
🧵
Elon had his cousins Andrew and James Musk and more from the Tesla AI team go over lines of Twitter code. Elon himself was sat with a laptop looking at the code.
This was when they decided to fire 85% of the staff - the remaining team needed to go “all in” and Twitter 2.0 would no longer prioritize “psychological safety” or remote work as 1.0 had.
One of Elon’s team came up with the idea that Elon shouldn’t simply fire all the staff. The team should be asked if they want to go all-in, because it was going to be hardcore.
INSIGHT: Here's why X is discontinuing the legacy @Pro/Tweetdeck.
Legacy Tweetdeck runs on very old APIs. Keeping it running costs the team time and money, and likely leaves the platform more vulnerable to manipulation.
The team are aiming to upgrade the new Pro asap.
Tweetdeck was largely put aside by Twitter 1.0 for years, explaining why its tech got so outdated.
It seems that now it's becoming a paid Premium feature, Pro is getting much more attention and dev resources than before.
An example of how legacy Tweetdeck's outdated systems have left X/Twitter more vulnerable: during the Rate limiting in early July. Tweetdeck ran off completely different rate limits to the rest of X, leading to the team having to shut it down completely as an emergency measure
NEWS: 𝕏/Twitter is threatening legal action against the campaign group Center for Countering Digital Hate, over what it says are the group's false claims of rising hate speech on the platform.
In response, the group has accused X Corp of intimidation and said the threat is an… https://t.co/goiOiNkYcttwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The letter by Elon's lawyer Alex Spiro accused the group of making "“inflammatory, outrageous, and false or misleading assertions about Twitter”. X Corp is considering whether the CCDH may be liable under the Lanham Act.
The CCDH's lawyer responded: "Simply put, there is no bona fide legal grievance here. Your effort to wield that threat anyway, on a law firm’s letterhead, is a transparent attempt to silence honest criticism. Obviously, such conduct could hardly… https://t.co/TN81dRsYEVtheguardian.com/technology/202… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
NEWS: San Francisco police interrupted the dismantling of the iconic Twitter sign, but concluded that no crime was committed
San Francisco Police Department said at approximately 12:39 P.M., officers assigned to Tenderloin Station responded to Twitter HQ regarding a report of a possible unpermitted street closure
“Through their investigation officers were able to determine that no crime was committed, and this incident was not a police matter,” an SFPD spokesperson wrote.