The Composite Guy Profile picture
Oct 3, 2023 14 tweets 8 min read Read on X
1/ Someone presented this article to me as evidence that asylum seekers are a net benefit to European economies

Such headlines are common, so I thought I'd examine how they have come to this conclusion

This is a perfect example of how academia and the media lie to you

🧵 Image
2/ The article's author challenges the notion that asylum seekers will be an economic burden, stating many argue without evidence.

They then cite a 2014 Oxford study as their proof.

So let's look at this study >>> Image
3/ The research opens by telling us how we're facing the most serious refugee crisis in 20 years and aims to dispel five myths pertaining to asylum seekers' economic impact

So how will they measure this?

Oh, by looking at refugees settlements in UGANDA

rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/…

Image
Image
4/ That's right, Uganda.

This is a country with a literacy rate of 74%, a life expectancy of 60-years-old and is ranked 166th in the Human Development Index

Their GDP per capita is ranked at 155th and their average IQ is 76
Image
Image
5/ The authors highlight refugee entrepreneurship, showcasing Ethiopian restaurants, Somali gaming parlours & a Congolese cinema

Compelling evidence that refugees will thrive in Europe

Who here can say that Vienna wouldn't benefit from a screening of Ghostbusters in a mud hut?

Image
Image
Image
6/ Another 'key finding' is that refugees are more technologically adaptive and have higher levels of internet use than the native population.

At the time of the study, only 15% of Uganda had access to the internet.
Image
Image
7/ Here are some examples of refugees creating 'appropriate technologies'

While Europe replicates the conditions which caused the big bang with 17 mile particle accelerators, the authors suggest that asylum seekers will enhance Europe with mud stoves and wooden bikes

Image
Image
Image
8/ Without actually quantifying their contribution, the authors claim that many asylum seekers positively contribute to the thriving economy of Uganda.

So now let's check the actual data for how asylum seekers have impacted European economies >>>
Image
Image
9/ Research from the University of Amsterdam revealed that the average asylum seeker cost the Dutch €475,000 per refugee

demo-demo.nl/wp-content/upl…
Image
10/ In Norway, asylum seekers earn half of what natives do, have substantially lower employment rates and far higher rates of participation in social welfare programs

cream-migration.org/publ_uploads/C…


Image
Image
Image
11/ In Finland, the average Iraqi migrant (aged 20-24) costs €844k if they choose to have children, costing €1.27 million more than the average Finnish-born family

Worse still, a single Somali immigrant costs the Finnish state almost €1 million

suomenperusta.fi/content/upload…
Image
12/ Sweden took in the most refugees per capita during the migrant crisis of 2015.

A report estimated that the net tax cost for migrants and migrants' relatives amounts to an average of $10bn per year.

The net tax cost is on average 2.38% of GDP

via.tt.se/data/attachmen…
Image
13/ Six years after the migrant crisis, 65% of Syrian refugees & 43% of Afghan refugees of working age are still on social welfare in Germany

euractiv.com/section/politi…
14/ The individual who shared the initial article likely only read the headline, reinforcing their preconceptions

This is what the majority do and it's expected

What's despicable is how academics and the media knowingly use such obviously ludicrous data to push narratives

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Composite Guy

The Composite Guy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CompositeGuy_

Feb 18
1/ More Windrush creationism to debunk. I'll go line-by-line, fully cited with links.

"The Windrush generation were actively recruited and openly invited to come to the UK to help rebuild after the war."

Clement Attlee literally wanted to divert the ship to East Africa.Image
2/ Here are the contemporary parliament debates regarding the Windrush.

They discuss how passengers were warned about having difficulty finding work in Britain and months later, the majority were still unemployed.

A complete contradiction to the 'actively recruited' myth. Image
Image
3/ Documents from The National Archives at the time reveal that the passengers had no particular skills and were warned they will have difficulty finding work. Image
Read 10 tweets
Feb 6
1/ A reminder that Sajid Javid, serving as Home Secretary at the time, wrote a personal letter to the ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang, assuring him he would not be deported.

Javid is of Pakistani heritage and was born in Rochdale. Image
2/ Gave multi-millions of taxpayer's money to mosques Image
3/ His family involved in visa scheme which brought Pakistanis into the UK by arranging marriages for cash Image
Read 11 tweets
Dec 14, 2025
1/ Let's do a 'visible reminder' of those who exploited Grenfell, our civic Golgotha, for fraudulent gain.

Of the 18 convicted for fraud, 95.5% were non-White.

🧵 Image
2/ Derrick Peters lied about living in Grenfell and was put up at Kensington's Park Grand Hotel for free for 6 months.

During his stay, he was arrested for burglary but the judge let him off with community service, despite Peters' 40 previous convictions. Image
3/ Alvin Thompson claimed he helped people escape the building.

Thompson told doctors that he had recurring nightmares of seeing a small child at a window in the fire, flash backs to stepping over bodies and survivor's guilt.

He was lying. Image
Read 18 tweets
Nov 23, 2025
1/ Time to dismantle more of this guy's nonsense.

First, anyone who claims the British looted $45tn immediately demonstrates that they haven't bothered to look into how the figure was ludicrously calculated.

The $45tn figure applies only to 2015.

In 2025, it's over $100tn!

🧵
2/ So how did Britain 'loot' an extra $55tn from independent India (2015-2025), more than double what was apparently taken during colonial rule?

Well, the figure uses a 5% compound interest rate and doesn’t reflect any actual nominal transfer from India to the UK. Image
3/ The $45tn figure, from Indian Marxist Utsa Patnaik, results from compounded interest projected to 2015.

By 2020, she updated it to $65tn, showing Britain 'stole' an extra $19tn in just four years.

In this period, the UK was sending billions in aid.

monthlyreview.org/articles/the-d…Image
Read 7 tweets
Nov 19, 2025
1/ Let's dismantle every one of these typical Indian claims about colonialism one by one

🧵🇮🇳
2/ India's pre-colonial GDP was due to having a quarter of the world's population at a time when America, Australia, and most of Africa was in the stone-age.

However, Britain and much of Europe at the time had around double the GDP per capita. Image
3/ India was a top 5 economy throughout British rule, overtaking China.

India's had the 5th largest economy in 1945, above Japan/China/France.

India's economy fell as low as 17th in 1990, many years after independence, despite having second largest population in the world. Image
Read 9 tweets
Nov 6, 2025
1/ A new working paper claims that non-EU migrants in Europe have a less negative fiscal position than natives - in other words, that they contribute more relative to what they receive.

Like every single one of these papers, the methodology is deeply misleading.

🧵 Image
2/ First thing to note is that in all but four nations (Czechia, Greece, Ireland and Portugal), non-EU migrants contribute less than natives.

This is despite having a younger age and in theory, being positively selected. Image
3/ To highlight what 'positive selection' means, let's look at Britain and Denmark.

In the UK, Danish migrants earn considerably more per capita than the British population.

In Denmark, British migrants earn more than the Danish population (and are the highest performers). Image
Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(