1/ Someone presented this article to me as evidence that asylum seekers are a net benefit to European economies
Such headlines are common, so I thought I'd examine how they have come to this conclusion
This is a perfect example of how academia and the media lie to you
🧵
2/ The article's author challenges the notion that asylum seekers will be an economic burden, stating many argue without evidence.
They then cite a 2014 Oxford study as their proof.
So let's look at this study >>>
3/ The research opens by telling us how we're facing the most serious refugee crisis in 20 years and aims to dispel five myths pertaining to asylum seekers' economic impact
This is a country with a literacy rate of 74%, a life expectancy of 60-years-old and is ranked 166th in the Human Development Index
Their GDP per capita is ranked at 155th and their average IQ is 76
5/ The authors highlight refugee entrepreneurship, showcasing Ethiopian restaurants, Somali gaming parlours & a Congolese cinema
Compelling evidence that refugees will thrive in Europe
Who here can say that Vienna wouldn't benefit from a screening of Ghostbusters in a mud hut?
6/ Another 'key finding' is that refugees are more technologically adaptive and have higher levels of internet use than the native population.
At the time of the study, only 15% of Uganda had access to the internet.
7/ Here are some examples of refugees creating 'appropriate technologies'
While Europe replicates the conditions which caused the big bang with 17 mile particle accelerators, the authors suggest that asylum seekers will enhance Europe with mud stoves and wooden bikes
8/ Without actually quantifying their contribution, the authors claim that many asylum seekers positively contribute to the thriving economy of Uganda.
So now let's check the actual data for how asylum seekers have impacted European economies >>>
9/ Research from the University of Amsterdam revealed that the average asylum seeker cost the Dutch €475,000 per refugee
10/ In Norway, asylum seekers earn half of what natives do, have substantially lower employment rates and far higher rates of participation in social welfare programs
11/ In Finland, the average Iraqi migrant (aged 20-24) costs €844k if they choose to have children, costing €1.27 million more than the average Finnish-born family
Worse still, a single Somali immigrant costs the Finnish state almost €1 million
2/ For those that are unaware, the caste system is a hierarchical division of society into four main varnas: Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras.
Higher castes consider lower castes to be impure, and thus rules are in place in order to stop 'caste pollution'
3/ An example of such rules was untouchability
Fixed distances of separation were set down, in multiples of six paces.
For instance, a Nayar/Nair (Kshatriyas) could remain within 6 steps of a Nambudris (Brahmin), and a Pulayan slave would have to keep ninety-six steps distant.
The same trend is found for average household income, we see Indians top the charts whereas Pakistani and Bangladeshi households are the least productive for the economy
This report concludes that the total net costs of immigration averaged €17 billion per year. Between 1995–2019, the total costs amounted to €400 billion