Until wage growth normalizes inflation will not durably return to the Fed's mandate.
So far scanning through the data wage growth still looks too high, particularly for those income segments with a higher propensity to spend. Let's start with Atlanta Fed Wage Tracker at 5-6%.
It is particularly useful because it a) uses matched person wages and b) covers income cohorts *below* 150k spend with much higher propensity to spend.
The monthly figures suggest a stabilization at that 5-6% annual pace the last few months.
Another similar tracker that is even more skewed to lower-income workers is the new Square income growth tracker which uses a similar methodology.
Suggests AHE roughly in the 5-6% as well, but no signs of stabilizing yet.
ADP pay insights is another good measure highlighting that pay increases for the youngest employees (typically earning less) is growing at a relatively rapid pace. Will be notable to see if that 16-24 figure continues to stabilize at these levels ahead.
Of course today all eyes will be on average hourly earnings, which is generally a worse measure than the ones above.
Thats because it is more comprehensive in terms of the income covered, which means changes in things like options and bonuses can make an impact here.
There was a lot of rejoicing last month that inflation was dead as AHE ticked down to 3% after several months closer to 5% annualized.
Whether this trend continues will probably be the most important data in the report today for the markets.
Most wage growth measures remain too high for the Fed to gain comfort that inflation durably beat.
Wages for the lowest income cohorts are growing at 5-6% for high propensity spenders and annualized productivity growth remains close to zero (even with an implausible 2Q print).
Before you believe the 2q productivity numbers as truth, note that such strength implies an implausible collapse in hours worked. It is most likely to be revised, eventually.
Inflation has to be on a clear path to durably get back to 2% for the Fed to even start to consider easing measures for the economy. This elevated wage growth in context will continue to give the Fed pause that inflation is really beat even if the measured numbers are improving.
It is important reason why we may see an 'air pocket' in policy over the next 6-9m where growth may slow but the Fed isnt immediately responsive to the weakness. And that delay makes the risk of a harder landing much more likely than is currently priced in.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A broad look at the inflation data suggests price pressures continue to rise as disinflationary benefits like housing moderate and price pressures from tariffs flow through.
Thread.
The US still has an inflation problem and the inflation impulse from rising tariffs is not helping the situation. Core PCE numbers reported a couple weeks ago remain almost 100bps above the Fed target and are set to march higher in coming quarters.
The CPI release brought our first read of official inflation data for July. A scan of other inflation triangulations suggests the inflation reality isn't looking good (even though expectations are contained). Will this translate into the actual reported data?
Anyone take a look at this Situation Awareness fund getting all the press? A client asked me so I took a look.
Claims 47% net returns YTD when 2 large 12/31/24 13F positions (MRVL & VRT) were down 44% & 36% and article claims limited short positions.
If you just take their 13F filings and estimate the monthly returns of their holdings you get something that looks like this below, which nets out much closer to 0% return YTD. Seems like an ok proxy since holdings didn't change that much over the quarter.
Portfolio definitely had winners in the 3/31/25 13F mix, but would have had to have way out of the money calls on INTC (making notional near zero value) and flawless timing on the winners (and/or lots of shorts alpha) to get close given disappointing 1Q picks.
Despite the political euphoria that's come from passing the BBB, netting out the impacts of immigration and tariffs under either current or likely policy suggests a negative shock to growth in coming quarters.
Thread.
Federal government policies are typically reactive to underlying conditions in the private sector and so while they can be important influences on growth, they rarely drive substantial growth pressures as a standalone.
The magnitude and direction of the policy suite from the new administration is relatively unusual - creating a large pressure on growth somewhat independent of what was happening in the rest of the economy (which was a pretty boring late cycle deceleration).
When most portfolios are long only, flexible strategies that can go short to cushion negative return periods are uniquely diversifying.
The challenge is finding cash efficient, low cost, positive return strategies that do it. Managed Futures run at 2x is an option.
Thread.
Allocators often face challenges designing portfolios that can help limit losses in down market environments. Despite the need, there are few investment offerings that perform well when other assets underperform but don’t have burdensome drag on the portfolio over time.
Some folks use buffer products, but those are often structured in a way that can limit upside. Others add out of the money puts, but that often results in meaningful negative return drag over time as premiums go unused.
For years the housing market has almost levitated despite drags from high rates and high prices thanks to limited supply and other assets financing demand. But in recent months that's started to flip.
The housing market has been much more resilient in recent years than most had expected in the face of very high rates. The biggest reason for that was that while buying demand dried up following the post-covid surge in rates, so too did supply.
In the last 6 months or so both have shifted to be more negative for prices. Inventory of new and existing homes have picked up while the slowing of asset prices combined with still high mortgage rates has caused buying demand to hit new lows.
The Fed has no reason to cut based on the data that matters.
The risk of inflationary pressures ahead from both tariffs and rising oil prices due to the Mideast conflict will only further solidify their desire to keep rates steady for longer than most expect.
Thread.
While many folks are calling for immediate substantial cuts, the data that the Fed cares about just doesn’t support any move at all. Take the UE rate. It’s remained low with any context and been flat for almost a year, suggesting current policy is roughly neutral.
Payroll growth has slowed substantially particularly if you include the likely revisions to the data that will eventually come. But the Fed isn’t in the business of making bets on QCEW revisions quarters from now to make monetary policy today.