Benjy Sarlin Profile picture
Oct 6 4 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
🟡NEW: Team Trump readies attacks on RFK Jr. as internal polling finds him helping Biden, @ShelbyTalcott reports semafor.com/article/10/06/…
“It’s single digits, but it’s enough where it counts to make a difference,” said one person familiar with internal Trump polling showing RFK Jr. helping Biden. semafor.com/article/10/06/…
Trumpworld on RFK Jr: “We’re gonna be dropping napalm after napalm on his head reminding the public of his very liberal views"

Another allied strategist: “He used to be a fun plaything to hurt Biden, now he is something that could hurt the GOP" semafor.com/article/10/06/…
Multiple RNC posts like this just in the hours since we reported Trump was prepping to go on offense vs RFK Jr after polling showed him as a spoiler threat

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Benjy Sarlin

Benjy Sarlin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BenjySarlin

Jun 15
"When your opponent is so popular the voters don’t care if he gets indicted, your problem isn’t the indictment. It’s his popularity." joshbarro.com/p/its-time-for…
Chris Christie: Definitely a @semafor reader semafor.com/article/04/19/… ImageImage
The obvious thesis of almost every R candidate is still the same and still unspoken. You don't have to sound like Liz Cheney to make the argument clear, obviously it will be based on other complaints (like DeSantis on COVID), but it's still 99% submerged semafor.com/article/04/19/… Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 14
All federal cases charged in DC: Illegitimate. A perfectly normal standard that wasn’t invented to rationalize a set of problems around one very specific person.
It’s a natural evolution given his own legal issue, but the R argument has migrated from FBI being inherently illegitimate to just Americans on juries
Originalism or something, I guess, maybe we should come up with some other legal system
Read 4 tweets
Jun 12
Big pivot from her prior statement, also maybe why you should not do statements before anything is known
The Biden DOJ is launching its self-coup, we must prepare for our final battl—ah wait that looks kind of bad now that I see it
Here's the fuller clip. There's a lot of DOJ weaponization walkup, but the big news is straight-up saying the allegations (if true) mean Trump put troops in harm's way
Read 4 tweets
Jun 11
The entire basis for Trump’s appeal is “vote for me, it enrages all the right people.” The idea you can beat him by arguing — or worse, hoping it sinks in subconsciously — that “he’s made too many people mad, so we need someone new” seems transparently ludicrous.
DeSantis is trying to make a substantive case against Trump, on COVID: The argument is he actually did screw up, DeSantis wouldn’t have. But asking people to be mad about something 3 years ago when you’re accepting the premise that voting for Trump defies a vast DOJ conspiracy…
Read 4 tweets
Jun 7
Obviously he's had a lot of time to stew on this, but as a reporter who was there this whole time..... Image
1) He did hit Christie in that debate! Repeatedly! In fact that was what half the attack was over, Christie called it a "drive by shot" paired with a "memorized 25 second speech" and said it was part of a practiced DC strategy. You can watch yourself.
2) The "ended" contention is just semantics. The debate sent Rubio crashing in NH, which led to a 5th-place finish (don't take my word for it, this was Rubio's *own explanation* at the time!). The result: Jeb, Kasich stayed in, and a multicar pileup in SC. nbcnews.com/politics/2016-…
Read 6 tweets
May 8
One key here: He’s still using all the hedges about protecting benefits for current recipients rather than disavowing support for benefit cuts. That’s what R’s tried the whole Paul Ryan era, before Trump kicked the issue to the curb.
“Trump used to support this thing I used to support, it was just what R’s did then” is a VERY different stance then “Trump used to support this thing that I support now and it’s wrong of him to attack it”
I think Trump v DeSantis electability arguments aren’t cut and dry and either could definitely win, but if you’re a D ad maker this interview alone is why you might think DeSantis is an easier matchup
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(