1. It should be possible to do things simultaneously. We can condemn Hamas' assault and its heinous acts against Israeli civilians while also not forgetting Israel has been a perpetrator of an often brutal occupation against the Palestinian people.
2. Yes, it's fair to describe what happened in Israel as its 9/11. But what that analogy tells us is that Israel should *not* replicate the mistakes, the zeal for war, the civil rights abuses, and utter destruction that the US exacted in the Middle East in its response.
3. I get that people are angry but I don't get people who go on Twitter right after a tragedy and talk about the Palestinians as animals, as lacking basic morality, without any knowledge of anything about a conflict they couldn't be bothered to care about until now.
4. This goes without saying so what's the point of saying it? This is why I didn't issue condemnations of terror attacks committed by Muslims when it was the fashionable thing to do. No one should doubt I'm against terrorism. It's on them if they doubt it.
6. The United States is not an innocent bystander. The Biden administration has allowed this conflict to fester, ignoring Palestinians and what was happening in Gaza in the name of a quixotic Trumpian effort to broker a peace deal between Israeli and Saudi Arabia.
This is probably the 5th time I've read the Khomeini interview and it never gets old. There are so many howlers. You almost get a Trumpian vibe from Khomeini in these moments, a kind of post-modern playfulness and looseness with observed reality.
Like, at this point, Khomeini is just messing with us. It's performance art of the highest level.
The U.S. can stop Tunisia's descent into full-blown dictatorship. Here's how. The practical steps I lay out in this @ForeignAffairs article are actually things the Biden administration can do. But it has to do them now.
Often people mention Tunisia's still-pending IMF bailout in passing, but no one has really laid out in detail how using the loan as leverage might actually work. There are risks, which I acknowledge in the piece. But on balance this is the best (and likely last) option available.
Yes it's unlikely. But institutions are made up of individuals who have agency. And it's possible that enough people in the State Department and the White House might wake up and at least consider putting brakes on the IMF deal. It's doable.
In some ways, cancel culture was worse after 9/11. And the implications for U.S. policy were nothing short of disastrous. Be careful what you wish for. The post-Trump era, as bad and polarized as it might seem, is far preferable to recent alternatives. shadihamid.substack.com/p/reading-sayy…
People complain about the "youth" a lot, including me. And on certain things the trend lines are pretty discouraging. On the other hand, when it comes to topics like the legacy of Sayyid Qutb, they feel empowered to write in a much more nuanced way.
I kind of love how my students apply concepts like "lived experience" to Sayyid Qutb. They have a point. In a culture that valorizes victimhood, it's fair to say that Qutb had some pretty real grievances. After all, he was tortured, executed and lived under an actual dictatorship
I had forgotten there was a large number of liberals obsessed with using the word “fascist” as a catch-all epithet. I wasn’t online as much, and I generally try to avoid following the news, for reasons @SarahTheHaider helpfully explains here: sarahhaider.substack.com/p/the-news-is-…
Many of you probably are inclined to think the worst of me. Because let's be honest, that what you *want* to do. It feels good to to find someone ostensibly on the left, particularly if they're brown, and declare your moral superiority over them.
The category of religion was created and weaponized for particular purposes. Like all belief systems, liberalism and nationalism require their own foundational myths.
With 9/11 and its aftermath, liberalism found an enemy against which to define itself—an Islam that was untamed, illiberal, and resistant to progress. Respectable observers tried to distinguish between Islam and "radical Islam" but this was easier said than done.
This was a lot of fun. We discussed Biden's classified docs, the professor fired over an image of Prophet Mohamed, Andrew Tate's conversion to Islam, and raw milk 👇🏽 open.spotify.com/episode/480YRG…
As I discuss here, the painting of the Prophet the professor got fired for depicts the beginning of the Islamic revelation when the Angel Gabriel says to Mohamed, ‘recite.’ It’s a powerful moment in the Islamic tradition. So how could it be Islamophobic?
If anything, the "offensive" image of the Prophet Mohamed is Islamophilic, not Islamophobic. It's a painting that honors the Prophet and beautifully captures one of the founding moments of Islam.