How Hamas completely debunked the Bronze Age Mindset - 🧵
There has been a lot of discourse among the American Right about the recent Hamas attack on Israel. This specific attack has caught this attention of the "vitalist Nietzschean" sphere of the Right, often followers of Bronze Age Pervert.
This sphere is known to be against moralizing and all "slave morality" coming from either the liberal establishement, the left or religion. An example of this would be the meme culture of the BAP sphere, which openly celebrates murder, rape and death.
However, with an ironic twist of reality, Hamas is precisely getting accused of what these BAP rightists vitalists uphold. But when they are faced with Hamas's "barbarian vitalist attack" on Israel, utilizing non-modern warfare techniques, they suddenly all cowered out.
All of the BAP sphere has stopped celebrating "vitalism" when it came to Israel. This is because it is now "low IQ Muslims" that do it. It is very clear that Islam challenges the ontological foundations of the Nietzschean worldview. They can not explain Hamas on their terms.
Since you are forced by the rise of the world market to take a position (the American people's money is going into this), the Nietzschean BAP sphere can not say anything. They are practically rendered politically irrelevant.
Thus, their position is reduced to fence-setting or straight zionism, a position completely and utterly in line with the political establishement in America. All of this to claim to be "right-wing dissidents".
All of the rejection of moralizing now became an endorsement of moralizing. BAP openly retweeted a post denouncing "the rape & genocide" of Hamas (unproven by the way) while he himself, a couple days earlier, celebrated the killing of a leftist journalist saying it turned him on.
This reveals a huge hole in BAP's worldview. A gap between his "complete surrendering to natural instinct" and "transcendetal Platonist moralizing". He has now suddenly decided to start moralizing! He has found the exception to his Nietzscheanism!
This single event has proven the complete bankruptcy of the Nietzschean outlook. It can never explain REVOLUTIONS, it can only react to it in its own moralizing sense through its metaphysical lense of "will to Power". It is fundamentally a whining ideology.
The Nietzschean outlook does not understand that high culture is only *secondary* to material harmony of society. Only when inherent tensions are solved in modernity can "high culture" be produced once again. Harmony is directly derivative of political & economic realities.
Thus, taking the metaphysical lense of "will to Power" becomes non-sensical when faced with a pre-modern (non-aristocratic) revolutionary force. It is what *creates* (or destroys) aristocracy itself. Faced with the deep ancient Islamic spirit, the Nietzscheans have no answer.
In the same way that the revolutionnaries of the 20th century rendered Nietzschean fascism politically useless (this was done by Mao and the creation of Neo-China), the same is happening with the new Hamas partisan. This is material Being asserting itself against ideology.
This has forced the online political sphere, specifically the Right, for a re-alignement. You either *oppose* the current political establishement (left-wing) or you support it (right-wing). BAP has chosen to support it.
The choice is clear.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Bronze Age Mindset is a book that has divided the right wing and revived interest in the Nietzschean outlook.
But, there is a specter haunting it - a fatal crack in its worldview...
Here's the complete and fatal critique of the Bronze Age Mindset -🧵
The kernel of this critique will be biology, since it is the basis of BAP's understanding of society. The logic of the biological outlook will help us make a broader critique of the book.
Before starting, to get an understanding of where this is going, here's the guiding outline:
"If homosexuality disappears, fascism will vanish"
This is the infamous line from the Soviet political thinker Maxim Gorky.
Here's how a Communist arrived at a typically *Christian* morality and why that's relevant to our current context - 🧵
This line was written in Gorky's article titled "Proletarian Humanism", where he argues that the ruling class organized fascism in Europe to counter the immanent working class revolutions that would happen inspired by the USSR's rise to power.
The last way of countering the working class is to use the most socially rejected elements of society, such as the homeless, the vagabond youths, alcoholics, and alike to terrorize the streets.
This is exactly what was happening in Nazi Germany.
Be wary of anyone claiming they can measure your intelligence, then classify and compare you with society and the "international community".
Specifically if it involves race, nationality or religion.
They are lying.
Here's how IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle - 🧵
The "IQ" test actually only provides substantive informortion with regard to a person's level of extreme stupidity and, to a lesser extent, their aptitude for passing specially devised tests made by academics.
In the field, the concept is not well worked out mathematically. It fails to correctly handle dimensionality and causes serious errors in correlation and asymmetry.
Above all, it seems to be heavily promoted by eugenists such as the Quillette magasine.
Nazi scientists and the race realists of the 20th century absolutely hated Soviet biology. Wonder why?
Let me introduce the Soviet biologist Trofim Lysenko.
He firmly proved that the modern concept of the gene is superfluous and thus permanently destroyed eugenics -🧵
The modern conception of the gene is as such: there exist distinct single “heredity units" that all phenomenologically manifest themselves in the species possessing them.
It was first advanced by Mendel and adopted by various race realists to structure a race-based society.
The followers of Mendel conceive that genes contain, in some kind of code script, the entire pattern of the individual’s development and of its functioning in the mature state.
For Marx's birthday, here's a thread addressing the common misconceptions and myths about his thought -🧵
Starting with a controversial one; religion.
Myth #1: Marx wanted to attack religion.
Some conceive Marx as the precursor to Richard Dawkins. However, Marx, while not believing, did not spend his time doing polemics against religion.
His famous Opium formula is often quoted without its full context:
While Marx saw modern religion as something which will whither away after the necessary developments in the mode of production, he was against any type of direct attack against this "real suffering" that is religion: