Ali A. Rizvi Profile picture
Oct 10 12 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Either you’re pro-Palestinian or pro-Hamas.

You can’t be both.

Some things to note about this current conflict:

(thread)
➡️ Hamas is more loyal to the Iran’s mullah leadership than it is to its own Palestinian people. It is a despicable group that fires rockets from its own hospitals and schools to get Israel to bomb them so it can exploit dead Palestinian children to get the world’s sympathy. Hamas is no more loyal to the Palestinian people than the Islamic Republic of Iran is to the Iranian people.
➡️ Egypt controls the southern border of Gaza. There are two million people trapped in Gaza, and they’re partly trapped there because of Egypt, the largest Arab country in the world. The blockade of the Gaza Strip is cooperatively maintained both by Israel and Egypt. Whenever Gazans have been bombed by Netanyahu’s Israel and wanted to escape across their southern border, Egypt has said no. If all the “pro-Palestinian” activists celebrating Hamas truly cared about the Palestinian people, they would also have an accountability campaign for Egypt.
➡️ Netanyahu has badly weakened Israel in three significant ways:

1. He is aiming for a single-state solution which will eventually have a population that is over 50% Arab. If they get the right to vote, Israel will no longer be a Jewish state. If they don’t get the right to vote, Israel will no longer be a democracy. Netanyahu is leading Israel to being either a Jewish state or a democracy, but not both.
2. Israel was one of the few issues that always had 100% bipartisan support from both Republicans and Democrats in the United States. Netanyahu figured it would be a great idea to torpedo that and alienate Democrats during the Obama era, which also created a cleft between American Jews—who largely vote Democrat—and Israeli Jews.
3. With his recent judicial overhaul and dictator-like grabs for power domestically, Netanyahu has also further divided the Israeli people, deepening political divides more than ever. This is not unrelated to the massive intelligence failure that led to the deadliest terrorist attack in Israel’s history happening on his watch.

In many ways, Netanyahu isn’t any less of an existential threat to Israel than Iran.
Right now, here’s the way to think about this.

You’re a kid in school and another kid with a legitimate grievance against your grandparents (that wasn’t your fault or his) is coming at you to beat you up. You manage to subdue him—you’re sitting on top of him now, your hands pinning his wrists to the ground. “Let me go!” he says. “I don’t want to fight,” you say. “If I let you go, do you promise not to hit me?” But he’s silent. If you let him go, he punches you out. But if you don’t let him go, you’re a bully forcing yourself on this younger, poorer kid. It’s hopelessly deadlocked.
When Israel did try to loosen the grip in 2005, withdrawing from Gaza, dismantling all settlements, removing all settlers and soldiers, and opening the border for commerce, many resources were provided to spend on education, infrastructure, and trade. Hamas used them instead to amass weapons, build tunnels into Israel, and build bomb shelters, but only for its leaders. Notably, Gazan civilians weren’t allowed access to these bomb shelters. It has never been about the Palestinian people for Hamas.
People on both sides will tell you, “There are no two sides to this, there is only one right side.”

This is absolute, utter BS.

There is the side of Hamas’s terrorism and Netanyahu’s war crimes.

And there is the side of the Israeli and Palestinian civilians caught in the crossfire.

It’s not that hard.
And remember that this is still at heart a religious conflict. Read Exodus 23:31-32 or Deuteronomy 1:8 (among others) for Netanyahu’s completely irrational justification for settlement expansion. And read Surah 5:51, 59, or 60, or Hamas’s charters of 1988 or 2017 to understand its driving motivation.

Don’t listen to the “nothing to do with religion!” crowd. Religion poisons everything, religion kills, and that couldn’t be clearer in this case.
It’s been 75 years, and several generations of people have been born in this land on both sides.

You may have your opinion about the mistakes their grandparents and great-grandparents made, but none of the people who live there today have any other place to call home.
You are not obligated to pick sides on this issue, however hard you’re pushed.

Just know that Hamas is no friend of Palestine, and Netanyahu is no friend of Israel.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ali A. Rizvi

Ali A. Rizvi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @aliamjadrizvi

Feb 18
The question isn't 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 Andrew Tate @Cobratate is exploiting Islam to grow his Muslim fanbase, but 𝘸𝘩𝘺 he finds Islam so compelling in the first place.

Let’s dive in.

Thread ⬇️ Image
Look at verse 4:24 in the Quran. It starts as follows, and the consensus on translation is pretty much universal:

---
"And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you." [Pickthall]

2
Two more translations:

"And [also prohibited to you are all] married women except those your right hands possess." [Sahih International]

"Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess.” [Mohsin Khan]
---

3
Read 19 tweets
Apr 26, 2022
In a break from most of my friends, I’m a big admirer of Elon Musk. I think he is the Edison (Tesla?) of our times.

Unlike billionaires like Warren Buffett, who made their fortunes by investing in other people’s ideas, Elon has made his by pursuing innovative,

/1
difficult challenges that required lots of risk and very few people thought were realistic pursuits. If it were just about the money, he could easily have gone the Buffett route after selling PayPal, or any of the other easy routes. So I don’t think it’s as easy as the

/2
“all billionaires are evil” meme.

Elon Musk is turning a long-dreamed-of progressive agenda into actual reality.

Electric vehicles. Exploring space and other worlds humanity could possibly live on. Building tunnels to solve traffic problems. A renewable energy project that

/3
Read 15 tweets
Feb 22, 2021
Ah, Woody Allen again. It's tragic all around if you want to believe the victims. Dylan Farrow claiming abuse by Allen. Moses Farrow and Soon-Yi claiming years of abuse by Mia Farrow.

This isn't about believing victims—it's about choosing *which* victims to believe.

Are some /1
alleged victims more credible than others? I don't think any are lying—I think they're all sincere about what they believe.

When you watch the HBO doc, you believe Woody's guilty—for all his artistic genius, the guy's creepy. But when you read Moses Farrow's and Soon-Yi's /2
articles and interviews, you believe Mia Farrow was the abuser. All of the people in this tragic saga have been interviewed only by advocates of their side. There has never been any "cross examination" of either Woody Allen or Mia Farrow.

The only solution to all of this is /3
Read 5 tweets
Nov 4, 2020
Learnings from last night:

1. Biden likely wins. He's got AZ and NE-2 and WI, is holding NV, and if he wins MI (he's leading there with over 90% of the vote in), he's already at 270. He won't need GA or PA then, but could win at least one of those too.
2. Bernie would NOT have won this. Big lesson: The socialist/communist tag Trump pinned on Biden/Dems worked. Cuban Latinos likely cost him Florida. This could've been a wider effect if Bernie was the nominee. Far-right candidates can win in America but far-left candidates can't.
3. Fox News has a fantastic team of statisticians who probably pissed off Trump more than the other networks by calling Arizona for Biden earlier and sticking by it. They consistently had a higher electoral count for Biden vs Trump than the other networks, and they were right.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 23, 2020
This must be said:

Democrats need to go and VOTE IN PERSON.

Put on your masks and sanitizer, keep your physical distance, and VOTE. IN. PERSON.

Do not vote by mail-in ballot, unless absolutely necessary.

There are now two huge reasons why this is necessary:
1. Mail-in ballots are rejected at much, much higher rates than in-person ballots.

Missing or mismatched signatures, envelope problems, missed deadlines, and other issues resulted in **OVER 500,000** mail-in ballots being rejected in the primaries.

Seriously.
Considering the razor-thin margins many battleground state elections come down to, it's obvious that this is not a risk Democrats can afford.

Worse, the mail-in ballots most likely to be rejected are from minority, first-time, and younger voters.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 22, 2020
I don’t understand this naïveté around hoping that some Republicans will “do the right thing” and vote against moving ahead with filling RBG’s seat. Even the Republicans who hate Trump are with him when it comes to the Supreme Court. It was a major motivating factor for them back
in 2016. Now they’re looking at a 6-3 conservative majority Supreme Court. So WHY WOULDN’T THEY DO IT?

If the situation was reversed and Clarence Thomas had just croaked and Democrats had a chance to have a liberal majority SCOTUS just before an election where Republicans were
looking certain to win and the filibuster wasn’t a barrier, OF COURSE the Democrats would push through a nominee. They would flip flop, they would rationalize, they would do whatever they need to do to ensure it.

It is completely legal and constitutionally permissible for a lame
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(