Yesterday evening, my wife got a message that a BA student in her department, Bruna Veleanu, was killed at the rave in Southern Israel on Saturday. Bruna was an immigrant from Brazil, and her only family in Israel was her sister and mother. 🧵
Her burial was set for later the same night, and there was concern there would not be enough people in attendance for a proper religious ceremony as required by Jewish law (aka a minyan). My wife sprang into action trying to mobilize people at the university, order flowers, etc.
As we turned off the freeway to the cemetery, we were met with a huge traffic jam from people trying to get into the cemetery. "Well," we said to ourselves, "there must be a lot of funerals now because of all the people who died." Waze said the 1 KM trip would take 30 minutes.
When we arrived at the cemetery, we learned that everyone was there for Bruna! At least 1,000 people, some reports say 10,000 came, including five university deans. Many people were turned away by police who felt such a large gathering was inadvisable given the present situation.
As we stood there listening to her sobbing mother, sister and friends eulogize her through their tears, we were instructed that if the air raid sirens sounded, we should calmly lay on the ground where we stood and cover our heads with our arms.
As we all walked together to lower her into her final resting place, police came and told the crowd to go home: "There's a war on and if a rocket lands here now there will be hundreds dead." Everyone ignored them. Nobody was going to abandon her in those final moments.
Earlier that day we attended a memorial service for a friend's parents who were killed Saturday morning when Gazan militants who were going door-to-door through their town shooting people destroyed their house with an RPG, apparently. They were a lovely, peace-loving couple.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Remember how the COVID vaccines contaminated with endotoxin & plasmid DNA that Pfizer/BioNTech sold to the world were only tested on 252 people, but they said they'd compare them w/the ~20K subjects who got higher quality ones?
New FOIA proves they never did that!
But I did.🧵
The adverse event rate among the subjects who got the new 'Process 2' doses was 2.5x higher than the AE rate of all other treatment subjects in the same age group & 2x higher than other treatment subjects at the same sites -- controlling for sex, obesity and comorbidities.
Only 4 of the process 2 subjects were tested for neutralizing antibody titers (aka immunogenicity) -- all of them aged 22 and younger.
Only 3 out of the 4 showed presence of antibody titers 1 month after second jab.
None were tested for neutralizing titers before vaccination.
"The enemy is not Aspartame. Our foe are nations who have failed us."
Those are the words of Prof. Woodrow Monte who has been trying to raise the alarm about Aspartame for 30 years - almost since is FDA approval in 1981.
Why?🧵
Aspartame is made from methanol, a form of alcohol that can cause severe toxic syndrome in humans (but not in lab animals) at low doses due to human genetic mutations.
Methanol itself is metabolized into formaldehyde, which is also toxic.
And cancer isn't the only problem!
Prof. Monte has linked Aspartame to many other health issues, including diabetes (which in turn increases risk of Alzheimers and Autism), multiple sclerosis, birth defects & breast cancer.
Series of illuminating talks (if I do say so myself) from last week's conference on Propaganda and Mental Health. Here is mine on Censorship & Suppression of COVID-19 Heterodoxy.
@NAffects, who has been working with @mtaibbi and Racket News, gives the lowdown on the #TwitterFiles and their discovery of a massive and growing anti-disinformation industry consisting of NGO, government, academic and military players.
Was the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine clinical trial a bait-and-switch?
There were >44,000 people in the trial, but only ~250 of them were given doses made with a new manufacturing method ('process 2') that was used to make enough doses to sell around the world.
To our knowledge, the safety and efficacy comparison they planned to do with those 250 subjects has never been published and has not been released in the FOIA'd documents that Pfizer submitted to the FDA. Was the comparison ever done? Where are the results?
@RetsefL and I explore the importance of this comparison and the potential impact of variability in the the production process of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on efficacy and safety in a newly published rapid response in the @bmj_latest. bmj.com/content/378/bm…
Today in the waiting room at a clinic of Israel's largest HMO, I see out of the corner of my eye I see "Pfizer" written on one of the screens they have dotting the walls. What's this all about? 🧵
(See alt text for translation.)
Had to wait for the selfless and generous "public service announcement" paid for by Pfizer to play again.
It starts out with this startling warning: "Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke by 5 times."
"Do you have high blood pressure? With atrial fibrillation?"
Fishy Findings from the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID Vaccine Clinical Trial Data
A🧵summarizing my collaborative investigation with @canceledmouse
(See tweets at end of thread for links to podcast discussion & blog post with more info & details.)
1/ Many trial subjects had positive PCR tests but were not counted as COVID cases for efficacy calculations.
We found that vaccinated subjects with positive PCR tests were *LESS* likely to be counted as a COVID case compared to the placebo group, at every step of the way:
2/ Why?
To be counted as a COVID case required you be symptomatic & have a positive PCR test result from Pfizer's *CENTRAL* lab.
But vaccinated subjects with a positive *LOCAL* test result were more likely to have a negative or missing central test result.