Read on Twitter
1/ Just saw that a company w/ a relatively expensive air cleaner is criticizing #CorsiRosenthalBox es. I wonder why? There are more peer-reviewed journal articles on the CR-Box than their product.
2/ Critical or our @ucdavis study that showed CADR that BLOW other systems away, implying the results seem too good and need to be replicated. Would love to see their data, replicated and in a peer-reviewed journal.
3/ We used the same experimental process to test our CR Boxes in replicate as we did for commercial HEPA air cleaners and arrived at the same CADR listed by manufacturers for two commercial HEPA air cleaners (protocol worked!). Were those companies lying about their CADR?
4/ In fact, we are now showing similarly impressive and replicated results for four more CR Boxes and recently presented the results at #AAAR2013.
5/ Still waiting for those who make uninformed (at best) comments to show your data, including as many replicates as we have done. And it would be great if your protocols and results went through a rigorous peer-review process w/ publication in a high quality journal.
6/ We and others have done so for the CR Box. We'll keep waiting for yours.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
