There is no chance that Hamas could have broken through the security barrier around Gaza and gone on a killing spree for 8-26 hours before the IDF arrived. This means Israel let them through, which means the USA told them to, which means everything happening now was planned.
The Israel Government has refused to explain why the Israel Defense Forces, with 173,000 active personnel, 193 fighter jets, 38 attack helicopters and 1,760 tanks on standby, and advance warning of an attack, took almost 3 days to cross the 77 miles from Jerusalem to Gaza.
If you believe that, half an hour after two passenger planes struck the WTC, causing three towers to collapse on their own footprint, a third was allowed to strike the Pentagon, then you probably believe that the inmates of a concentration camp can escape, and this is your 9/11.
This is @efenigson, an Israeli journalist who served in the intelligence service of the Israel Defense Forces for 25 years, giving her opinion about the likelihood of Hamas launching this attack. This is the question every politician justifying genoicde in Gaza must be asked,
A lot of the comments on here appear to be based on an inaccurate perception of the size of the Gaza Strip over which the IDF, which this year was ranked the 4th strongest military in the world, have complete control. For those in the UK, this is how it fits inside London.
Since so many people are reading this post, here’s a link to a previous thread summarising the history of the Gaza Strip and the conditions of life there. These are worth bearing in mind when estimating the likelihood of Hamas militants attacking Israel.
There’s also this. By starting another war in the Middle East, most immediately with Iran (‘all roads lead to Iran’), the US has the means to economically destabilise the Arab nations threatening the US dollar as the reserve currency of the world, which is what BRICS represents.
In confirmation of which, the USA has sent a second carrier strike group, led by USS Dwight D. Eisenhower with 9 aircraft squadrons, to join the first group, led by the largest carrier in the world, USS Gerald R. Ford, off the coast of Gaza. This isn’t to kill more Palestinians.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don’t know the provenance of this footage, which claims to show Hamas forces passing through the unarmed Gaza security barrier last Saturday; but who is the fair-haired white man in the Ray-Bans carrying an assault rifle and directing the motorcyclists in the Hamas headscarves?
One thing’s certain, he isn’t Palestinian. By his uniform, he could be Israeli police. Or is he CIA? Where do we recognise that buzz-cut, gum-chewing strut from? Why is he walking past ‘terrorists’ towards Gaza? Why did he wave at them? What’s he doing there? And where’s the IDF?
0:29 White man waves at ‘elite’ Hamas soldier struggling to get his bike over the ramp.
0:41 White man gestures to motorcyclist and shouts something (‘Here’?)
0:42 White man passes by motorcyclist.
0:46 White man continues to help other motorcyclists passing through the fence.
Between May 2015 and November 2021, the UK licensed £400m of arms sales to the apartheid State of Israel: £183m on military technology, £104m on aircraft and drones, £20m on bombs and missiles, £4.6m on armoured vehicles and tanks, £1.9m on ammunition and £1m on small arms.
Between 2011 and 2020, the UK licensed £16.8 billion of arms to countries on the Govt’s own Human Rights Watch List. Of the 53 countries listed, the UK sold arms and military equipment to 39 of them. In addition, it has issued 43 Open Licences, which allow for unlimited exports.
BAE Systems, the UK arms manufacturer and largest ‘defence’ contractor in Europe, produces 15% of the value of every US F-35 fighter, which at a production cost of $78 million each are currently being used in airstrikes on the Gaza Strip, where half the population are children.
In 1948, Palestinians escaping the Naqba fled to the Gaza Strip, whose borders were fixed by the armistice between Israel and Egypt in 1949. Initially administered under the military authority of Egypt, Gaza was subsequently occupied by Israel in 1967 during the Six-Day War.
In 1993, Gaza’s administration was taken over by the State of Palestine, which also exercised partial authority over areas in the West Bank. But Israel retained control over its borders, airspace and territorial waters. In 2005, Israel withdrew its settlement camps and soldiers.
In 2006, Hamas, the Islamic fundamentalist political party, won the Palestinian legislative elections and expelled Fatah, the social democratic party, thereby creating two separate governments in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.
Woke, in the UK, began with Tony Blair telling us the British drink too much beer and we should be eating in restaurants. 25 years later, from Scotland’s racist First Minister to London’s racist Mayor, the country’s run by second-generation immigrants who hate Britain’s culture.
As the British know better than anyone, colonising a country means erasing its culture and replacing its leaders with foreigners who have no allegiance, in beliefs or customs, to the conquered people. UK’s woke-compliant leaders have been appointed by globalists for this purpose.
Whether Digital ID, CBDC, the WEF’s 15-Minute Cities, the UN’s eco-austerity or the WHO’s pandemic treaty, the programmes unilaterally imposed by UK’s woke leadership are designed to deprive the UK of its national sovereignty and reduce the native population to a subject people.
In November 2020 I wrote about Jonathan Van Tam’s record in the revolving door between Big Pharma and the UK Government. Rewarded with a knighthood for his part in manufacturing the COVID ‘crisis’, he has returned to work as a consultant for the US pharmaceutical company Moderna.
Professor Jonathan Van Tam, who Chaired the SAGE SPI-Modelling subgroup that was responsible for imposing lockdowns and other restrictions on the UK public, was also the UK’s Deputy Chief Medical Officer, a position he assumed in October 2017. gov.uk/government/pub…
Before that, Van Tam was in the pharmaceutical industry, joining the British pharmaceutical company SmithKline Beecham as an Associate Director in 2000, before moving to the Swiss healthcare company Roche as Head of Medical Affairs in April 2001. roche.com
The intended ideological reach of environmental fundamentalism over the British public is spelled out in the report published by the House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee in October 2022, ‘In our hands: behaviour change for climate and environmental goals’.
The report is clear about whose behaviour they want to change. It isn’t multinational corporations, our governments or the US military, the world’s biggest institutional consumer of petroleum which in fuel usage alone is the 47th largest producer of greenhouse gases in the world.
And it isn’t the behaviour of the Lords, Ladies, Baronesses, Bishops and Dukes who sit on the Environment and Climate Change Committee. It’s our behaviour they want to change: our consumption of food, heating of our homes, use of transport, consumer goods, our leisure activities.