Jonathan English Profile picture
Oct 15 10 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
One of the things that’s really hard for our generation to wrap our heads around is that until quite recently, the US had such a severe housing surplus that homes were literally being abandoned because nobody wanted to live in them in big cities all over the country, incl NYC 1/
People obviously know about places like Detroit but take Charlotte St in the Bronx (made famous by Jimmy Carter visit). It had apartment buildings that were abandoned & burned out. Was rebuilt as suburban style houses. Nobody could imagine there’d ever be demand for apartments 2/
Image
Image
One of the most notable elements of Ed Koch’s mayoralty was that they renovated a lot of abandoned apartments into affordable housing. Many of the buildings had been seized by the city for unpaid taxes since they had effectively no property value. 3/
Detroit had the most extreme population decline (from 1.85M in 1950 to 639k today) and much of the land has been seized by the city, but the Bronx also went from 1.47M in 1970 to 1.17M in 1980. Notable because the housing stock was relatively recent and high quality. 4/
Other places like Manhattan lost population (2.33M in 1910 to 1.96M in 1950 to 1.42M in 1980) but at least that initial decline was reduction of extreme overcrowding and poor housing stock in places like Lower East Side. Still, even there apartment buildings got abandoned. 4/
But this is why artists could take over whole buildings in places like Soho. Declining industrial areas weren’t in high demand when even middle class people could live by Central Park. 5/
What caused this extreme surplus? The biggest reason was that the car and especially the expressway allowed people to commute much further and therefore live on houses built on previously low-value farmland far from the city center. 6/ bloomberg.com/news/features/…
The earlier dispersal from places like the Lower East Side was enabled by subways and elevated trains. Urban development is always driven substantially by transportation. 7/
Part of the reason for the huge generational disconnect is that boomers grew up in that world and it’s been a dramatic shift to a world of housing shortage so quickly. They really did once live in a world where building too many homes meant house next door could be abandoned. 8/
Of course that world was an artifact of a one-time transportation revolution and is very unlikely to ever happen again. That’s why we need policies that reflect the world we now live in, not the world of 1970. 9/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan English

Jonathan English Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EnglishRail

Apr 19, 2022
Well this is the day I've been awaiting a long time! The deal is signed to move forward on GO Rail Expansion and Electrification. It's a pretty high-powered consortium. Who better than Deutsche Bahn to bring S-Bahn to North America? infrastructureontario.ca/Partner-Select…
Check out our @TorontoRBOT report for an idea of what this kind of major regional rail expansion could look like. bot.com/Portals/0/PDFs…
Includes reconstruction of tracks & platforms at Union Station. WSP, already in charge of platform expansion, is now in consortium. Union Station the keystone of the whole network. Better platforms can unlock its capacity. My article gives possible idea: urbantoronto.ca/news/2012/08/c…
Read 14 tweets
Jan 23, 2022
Since our @TorontoRBOT fare plan is getting discussed, I thought it would make sense to do a review of what it actually entails in a short thread. You can read the details all here: bot.com/Portals/0/Tran…
The key to it is that nobody ever pays for less than 2 zones, meaning that since Toronto is split into 2 zones, all TTC riders keep the same flat fare they pay today.
Riders across the TTC-905 boundary, from places like Scarborough, North York, and Etobicoke to Mississauga, Vaughan, Markham, Brampton get their fares cut roughly in half since they don’t get hit with a double fare anymore.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 20, 2022
So @GovKathyHochul apparently made link today btw Interborough and Cross-Harbour Freight tunnel. This actually could make some sense. A short thread...
The Cross-Harbour Freight Tunnel has long been proposed (esp by @RepJerryNadler), but it's hard to make work since it's a multi-billion $$ project and freight rail traffic to NYC is very limited for many reasons.
It would likely never be financially viable to build a dedicated freight rail tunnel from Jersey to Brooklyn for a few trains a day. But if it could have a dual purpose as a passenger rail tunnel, the combined funding streams could potentially make a challenging project viable.
Read 9 tweets
Sep 26, 2021
Before I finally have to return these to the library, I thought I’d tweet some images from these old reports, like these maps of old plans collected for the Metro Toronto Transportation Plan Review in 1973. Here is a map of the master plan from 1943. Image
The 43 plan already had an extensive freeway network, as well as the familiar Yonge, University, and Bloor (west) subway. The latter would’ve been shared with a freeway along Bloor, a concept which wasn’t finally dropped till the 50s.
Here’s 1948 plan from Norman Wilson, the TTC’s transportation guru. Highway network already looks familiar (of course with many things that never happened) plus Bloor, Danforth, University subways (plus Queen and some interesting branches). Image
Read 24 tweets
Jul 23, 2021
This is a really interesting and well-made point about the potential of rail to replace certain types of air travel, but there are some key points that need to be taken into account to make that happen. A thread:
The traditional thinking is that rail can be competitive with air when a trip takes less than 3 hours (sometimes extended to 4 now given tougher airport security). That means taking market share, but it generally doesn't mean replacing flights entirely. 2/
That's because airlines, esp in N America, think ~ hourly frequency is important in key business markets. If traffic drops, they downgauge (from 320/737 to RJ) rather than cutting frequency. A problem because main airport constraint is # of flights, not # of passengers. 3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(