*Thoughts on Jewish billionaires, US elite support for Israel, and why I expect it to continue indefinitely.*
There are so many Jewish billionaires that Forbes created their own list for them in 2022.
They count 267 Jewish billionaires. That's about 10% of the global population of billionaires, compared to 0.2% of all people on earth for almost a 5000% overrepresentation.
It counts 132 Jewish billionaires in the United States, out of a billionaire population of 756, which comes out to 17%. Jews are estimated to be at most 2.2% of the US population.
Of course the US will lean towards Israel. This is a good thing, since billionaires are on average smarter and much more humane than the general public. But the public is also with Israel.
This is also why I don't think polls showing younger Americans being less pro-Israel matter that much. Jews are not in the grievance studies department living off a $50K stipend in an expensive city. They're in private equity, on Wall Street, in the halls of Congress, and I don't think the rising People of Color alliance will challenge them. Wealthy Jews will skim off the Cory Bookers of the world and leave the African American Studies professors to continue in their "scholarship."
Seeing Harvard being bullied by rich donors has been eye opening. The people that the institution depends on for its funding are pro-Israel. Those that are at best a burden on Harvard take the side of Hamas.
People look at the state of activism and think that's where power lies, but if you've got money, you pay for the activists you want, and are generally smart enough to figure out how to have the biggest influence. I expect American elite support for Israel to continue indefinitely.
If policy was determined by polls, woke capital would've never been a thing. One committed billionaire can matter more than tens of millions of voters. Opponents of Israel won't "public opinion" their way out of this. richardhanania.com/p/why-is-every…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My God, how tall is this person? They include these photos and don't realize what a laughingstock it makes it. The trans thing is an assault on the human senses, you join the cult you become unable to see or hear what's in front of you.
Whatever happened to American governance? The US used to pride itself on merit-based selection in federal hiring. Government wasn't always seen as the incompetent monstrosity it is today
🧵on how the war on incompetence was originally won, and how civil rights changed everything
Over the course of 19th century, government hiring was based on patronage. Whoever won elections would hire their supporters.
The reputation of the government was so low, it was said that in a congressional report that jobs went to only adventurers, incompetents, and scoundrels.
After President Garfield was killed by a disappointed office seeker in 1881, Congress finally had enough.
It passed the Civil Service Reform Act, which required competitive examinations in hiring and banned drunks from office. By 1900, it covered nearly half the gov workforce.
I write about whether cancel culture has peaked. The phrase itself is from a monoculture that not longer exists.
We see a great bifurcation. On the right, it's almost impossible to get canceled for being un-PC. Left-wing institutions are as bad as ever.🧵 richardhanania.com/p/how-to-not-g…
Up until about a decade ago, elite institutions had an ability to cancel people even on the right. This was done through a handful of conservative gatekeepers that granted legitimacy. This was killed by greater polarization and social media and other new market forces.
15 years ago, right wingers would talk about how National Review personally hurt them. A young person reading today would probably be completely puzzled by this. Who cares about one magazine? It was a tiny intellectual and media ecosystem that could easily exclude people.
New York City just released a report titled "Crime and Enforcement Activity in New York City" for 2022. It tracks the identities of victims, suspects, and arrestees. Here are some of the highlights.
For context, NYC is about 32% white, 29% Hispanic, 23% black, and 14% Asian🧵
Let's start with "Misdemeanor Criminal Mischief." Here, the numbers are relatively even given what we'll see below. Black are only 50% of suspects and a smaller portion of arrestees.
In the area of murder, blacks are 63.8% of suspects, 57.8% of arrestees. Whites are only 2.9% of suspects. Interestingly, Asians commit murder at a higher rate than whites in NYC, a pattern we'll see in other crimes. I would guess this has something to do with age distributions
From 1936-1939, the federal government interviewed 2,300 ex-slaves in 17 states.
2/3 were over 80. By 1936, it had been 71 years since emancipation, so most had been young when they became free.
🧵on what was found, and how historians have used the interviews.
What’s most shocking to modern ears is the fact that many remembered slavery fondly. In the words of one interviewee: “Right now, I loves my marster an' his wife in de grave. Dey raised me an' showed me kindness all dey lives. I was proud of dem."
Another talked about having plenty to eat, including sausages, beef, and possum, and enough clothes to wear.