I have no ability to evaluate grainy videos and what different blast patterns look like. But I’ve spent several years developing lists of open source intelligence and forensic analysts who are consistently credible. That doesn’t mean they’re always right. But by credible …
2/ in this case I mean analysts who are highly knowledgeable in one of the relevant domains and use an empirical framework for analyzing videos, open source data etc. A lot of these come out of the Bellingcat world, others have grown out of the Syrian and Ukraine conflicts.
3/ I watched this group closely overnight as more videos and data came out and from what I can tell not one of these thinks the evidence points to an Israeli bomb as the source of the blast at the hospital in Gaza. To be clear, they’re not at all saying it’s open and shut.
4/ In fact I’m not sure any are saying it’s open and shut. That’s a high standard. But I think every one is saying the evidence points to some version of a failed rocket launch from within Gaza. And this with varying degrees of certainty. What I’ve also seen this morning …
5/ are a lot of questions about whether the blast was as large as originally reported and whether the fatality counts were really in the magnitude originally claimed. Unlike the ‘who did this’ question, the verdict in this case is less clear. It’s more that with daylight …
6/ photos many of the same people are saying it doesn’t quite add up. It’s worth noting that there were very large and very round numbers circulated almost immediately yesterday afternoon (US time) vastly faster than it would ever be possible to actually count numbers …
7/ of dead and wounded. Final points: this isn’t a booyah conclusion. Thousands of people have died in Gaza during this war. But this, as best I can tell, is what the people who have a proven track record of credibility in those earlier conflicts (as opposed to people…
8/ popping up in algos) seem to be saying as of this morning.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s admit that every reporter in DC knows but most won’t say for fear of falling out of favor with the bothsides rules of official DC: there is a two-tiered Justice System. One for Democrats, in which the most exacting focus on conflicts of interest are followed, often going …
2/ well beyond not only what the law or established norms require but sometimes even basic logic. Meanwhile for Republicans most of these rules simply don’t apply. Ever. Does anyone think that a newly installed President Trump in 2025 would leave in place US Attorneys …
3/ investigating matters tied to Trump or the Trump family for years into his administration? The very idea is absurd. In fact the Trump campaign is openly running on plans to thoroughly politicize federal law enforcement and target his enemies. Openly. When actual GOP …
Lots of discussion of Floridas new African-American history curriculum, especially that line about slavery helping slaves develop skills which they might be able to use for their own benefit. Is that like representative? How is the curriculum as a whole? Well, I’ve read …
2/ the entire updated AAH curriculum just updated. By way of background, I have a PhD in American history w a focus on the colonial period but covering all of Am history. I havent been professionally engaged in the literature as a working historian for abt 25 years. But I …
3/ do generally keep up to date. Overall the text isn’t as clownish as that one sentence might suggest. But there still major problems. They tend to be ones of emphasis and omission rather than outright fabrication. I’ll focus on three points. First that line about …
It’s helpful Bill telling us who he is with this taunt. This isn’t an effort to fund a debate. It’s simply an attack. Below this tweet Mark Cuban post a video take down of RFK jr junior that’s actually fairly glorious.
2/ Just one RFK jr bullshit line after another shot to smithereens. Watch it. It’s hilarious. I don’t know who broke RFK jr. I do remember all the way back in 2004 he led a lot of desperate people down the garden path with his supposed numerical analysis showing …
3/ John Kerry actually beat George Bush. That was a super close election fought with a lot of dirty tactics by the Bush team and a lot of voter suppression tactics by the GOP. So there was a very receptive audience for those claims. Back then he wasn’t known as a crank &
A friend asked me my take on this thread. So I’m seeing it a bit late. As someone who knows A LOT about Democratic politics, this is all true. If you were asking my own take I’d probably focus less on the anger abt getting exiled, though that is definitely part of it.
2/ In Star Wars terms, these two were on the dark side before they got the boot. Many on the left say yeah they were always triangulators and centrists and all that. They suck. And they may suck because of that. But that’s not what I’m talking about. I mean, the dark side.
3/ The best way to illustrate this is that there are a number of groups which come out of that world, you know, more centrist politics, a third way and all that. Those folks are all united abs frankly on fire saying these folks are dangerous liars. Rick refers to them.
I’m not that familiar with this particular degenerate. But two thoughts. One, every founder of the country wld hear this and say their version of fuck you, gimbus. Second it wld be hilarious to acquaint this freak with how things worked in 1220.
One of the fun “socially conservative”things that could happen in much of Europe was that the local manor lord could stop by & fuck your daughter. And also you weren’t allowed to move. You might take lord to court. Unfortunately the lord had his own private court you had to use.
3/ And that’s just the start of the gun really. It was awesome.
I’ve only read the lead of the CNN Alberta piece, going to dive in shortly. But the gist is pretty clear. Also seeing people asking why did they agree to the access? I think the answer to that question is clear. PR folks literally and figuratively work for their boss. And the …
2/ boss thought his plan would and was working. I’ve seldom seen a plan for a major media property so fundamentally misunderstand the environment in which the brand operates. It’s not that anyone botched anything. The whole theory of what cnn is and what cable news is …
3/ was fundamentally, catastrophically wrong. I’ve seen some people saying it’s not licht. It’s john Malone, the real power behind the discovery/Time Warner. That must be true to a significant extent. But Licht clearly bought into the idea and thought it would work.