NEW: THREAD: Remember when Jack Smith filed a motion to compel Donald to notify the court by 12/20 whether he was going to employ an “advice of counsel” defense? Well, haha, Donald has filed his response. Here’s a refresher on the DoJ filing. 1/
First, Donald wants to know why DoJ doesn’t also have to provide a defense. Probably because the prosecution doesn’t provide a defense. But what do I know? 2/ Image
Here, he makes the same “It’s so hard to review discovery and the schedule isn’t fair” argument that the judge has shot down multiple times. She’s not going to be happy that they keep making the same failed argument. Look for the judge to mention that. 3/
Image
Image
This is funny. Trump is mad that the DoJ wants him to turn over evidence before he decides whether he’s going to use the evidence. But DoJ only wants it AFTER he decides to use the defense. That’s what the whole motion was about. The Judge isn’t going to like this, either. 4/ Image
Oh my. Haha he’s actually arguing that he can’t possibly decide his defense without having the discovery. Which he has/will have by December. Also, “the cross and the sword”? Does he mean “the sword and the shield”? 5/ Image
This is funny. Trump says his constitutional rights are being trampled. His lawyers told the world a hundred times he planned on using advice of counsel defense. So I guess it was his own lawyers that did the trampling. Lulz 6/ Image
This footnote, good lord. The prosecution DOES recognize it has an obligation to produce discovery it recovers from investigation. That’s why they want you to TELL THEM about your defense. So they can investigate your production and reciprocate. 🤦‍♀️ 7/ Image
Pfffffft. “You can’t make this demand! But you should have made it sooner!” 8/ Image
Oh this is rich. “DoJ should have to give us all the stuff that we ourselves created and/or already have.” 9/ Image
There it is. Sword and shield. So they know the phrase at least. 10/ Image
And the best for last. “YOU CANT HAVE MY DEFENSE EARLY but I’ll totally give it to you early. How about January 15 instead of December 20? 11/ Image
So to sum up:

YOUR REQUEST IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

YOU SHOULD HAVE MADE IT SOONER

I’LL GIVE YOU THE STUFF

END/ storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mueller, She Wrote 🇺🇦 🇮🇱

Mueller, She Wrote 🇺🇦 🇮🇱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MuellerSheWrote

Oct 14
THREAD: There’s a new piece out in the Times. I’ll link a gift version in a minute. But man, seems odd to mention McDonald trying to rig the Nevada primary for Donald without mentioning he could be a witness against him in the March DC coup trial. 1/ Image
McDonald is one of the fraudulent electors Jack smith gave immunity to in exchange for testimony. Also, this is funny. Cuccinelli is SURPRISED that Donald is rigging the primaries! I feel like if he thinks for a few more minutes, he might figure it out. 2/ Image
Again, zero mention by the Times of the COUP TRIAL set to begin the day before trump’s rigged CA primary takes place. Seems like some significant context. 3/ Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 13
THREAD: An outline of what Andy McCabe and I will cover on this Sunday's episode of the JACK podcast.

1. Jack Smith's scathing response to Trump's motion to delay his Florida trial from May 2024 to December 2024. 1/
2. Jack Smith indicates he intends to prove Trump's motive for taking and retaining national defense information in the Florida case even though proving motive is not necessary. He will do this using UNCLASSIFIED evidence. 2/
3. The prevailing theories about WHY Trump took and retained the national defense information, violating the Espionage Act.

4. Judge Aileen Cannon and the October 12th conflict of interest hearings for Walt Nauta and Carlos DeOliveira. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Oct 12
THREAD: I was just watching the former Israeli Ambassador to the US Michael Oren on @DeadlineWH answering the question "how could this have happened", and he spoke about "The Concept". 1/
The Concept was the incorrect assumption that Syria and Egypt would not initiate a war with Israel that they could not win. That turned out to be false, and the result was the Yom Kippur War of 1973. 2/
Oren says there was a similar kind of concept at play here. He explained that Hamas wears two hats: their terrorist hat, and their government hat as the de facto sovereign of the independent Palestinian state known as Gaza. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Oct 11
NEW: Trump has filed (in the DC coup case) for permission to subpoena: the archivist, the clerk of the House, the entire House Admin committee, Biden’s current counsel Richard Sauber, the general counsel of DHS, Barry Loudermilk, and Bennie Thompson. 1/ Image
He wants to do this because he says Barry Loudermilk, the guy who lied 5 times about giving capitol tours ahead of the insurrection, told him that the 1/6 committee is withholding records. 2/ Image
Here’s a list of the records he seeks via the subpoenas. 3/ Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 10
NEW: THREAD: Jack Smith has filed a motion in the DC coup case asking Judge Chutkan to require trump to file his notice of intent to file an “advice of counsel” defense by 12/18. Let’s walk through it. 1/ documentcloud.org/documents/2402…
The DoJ reminds the court that if trump wants to use the advice of counsel defense - meaning “my lawyers said it was ok” - trump would waive ALL attorney-client privilege for all communications concerning that defense, which could lead to further discovery AND INVESTIGATION 2/ Image
DoJ points out that AT LEAST 25 witnesses including co-conspirators, campaign employees, the campaign itself, outside attorneys, a non-attorney intermediary, and EVEN A FAMILY MEMBER - have invoked attorney-client privilege. 3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
Oct 9
NEW: THREAD: Jack smith takes trump and Judge Canon to school today in a scathing response to trumps unfounded motion to postpone his Mar-a-Lago espionage and obstruction trial until after the election. Allow me to paraphrase some key points. 1/ storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
First, Smith says “we told you his motion to postpone CIPA (classified documents) was just a precursor for a motion to delay the whole trial. But the court already rejected this dumb argument when he first tried to schedule his trial for after the election.” (Paraphrasing) 2/ Image
It’s also pretty funny that Jack Smith reminds the court that there are still SEVEN months between now and the trial date, and that the court set that trial date less than three months ago. 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(