JUST IN: Donald Trump is mounting what appears to be the heart of his effort to derail the election-subversion case against him in Washington, D.C., filing three motions tonight to dismiss the case:
1) On constitutional grounds 2) On legal grounds 3) For selective prosecution
Trump’s filings boil down to a few points:
1) The charges criminalize his constitutional right to petition govt
2) The charges fail as a matter of law (he didn’t use “trickery” against govt, he didn’t act “corruptly” to obstruct Congress)
3) The Senate acquitted him already.
He also wants at least an inquiry on “selective” prosecution, citing reporting on Biden’s views/comments about the case.
Prosecutors will have a chance to respond to these motions in the next few weeks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
JUST IN: Prosecutors have filed their lengthy response to Trump’s effort to dismiss the Washington, DC charges against him by claiming presidential immunity.
Despite his claims, they say, there are no parallels to Lincoln or Washington in his conduct. Details Tk
The government cites Aaron Burr to point out that former presidents /VPs can be prosecuted for conduct while in office.
NEW: Judge Chutkan's gag order marks a new phase of Trump's life as criminal defendant -- but it also raised a series of unanswered questions about how it will work.
1) The big unanswered question: How will Chutkan enforce violations? She could impose monetary fines, social media restrictions, in-court scoldings and even pretrial incarceration. The order doesn't hint at a framework or guide for any such punishments.
2) Chutkan's written order applies the gag to "interested parties." That could mean simply Trump, is lawyers and the special counsel's office. But the phrase is vague and undefined in the order. politico.com/news/2023/10/1…
NEW: It’s hard to imagine a more consequential moment for Trump — other than the verdict itself — than an order by Judge Chutkan sharply curbing his penchant for invective against his perceived enemies. politico.com/news/2023/10/1…
But Trump has spent a year fashioning the justice system as his enemy — assailing witnesses who have testified against him and relitigating the conduct at the heart of the charges against him
That doesn’t work when you’re a criminal defendant. The story:
JUST IN: George SANTOS hit with 23-count supereding indictment.
Prosecutors say Santos entered into two sweeping conspiracies to defraud donors and the FEC -- including stealing "the personal identity and financial information of contributors to his campaign" and charging "contributors’ credit cards repeatedly, without their authorization."
HAPPENING NOW: In pretrial hearing for Trump codefendant Ken Chesebro, his attorneys keep leaning on fact that offering a contingent slate of electors is envisioned under the Electoral Count Act. So how can it be be a crime? Dems did it in Hawaii!
But...
Chesebro is charged not just with devising elector strategy -- but with using it not as a legal strategy but with using them as a political tactic to disrupt Congress.
It's not just that Hawaii wasn't decisive in the 1960 election. It's that the contingent electors Dems' attempted to offer while a recount was pending played exactly zero role in state legal proceedings or in Richard Nixon's decision to count Hawaii for Kennedy.