Miles King Profile picture
Oct 29 8 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
While lots of organisations have criticised Therese Coffey's comment that beaver introductions aren't a priority of the Govt, there's a far more insidious message contained within her 17th October letter to EFRA cttee. She doesn't mention conservation as a priority, once. 🧵 1/8
The Govt overall priority is "increasing biodiversity". This means "Our priority in achieving our ambitious targets on biodiversity is our focus on habitat restoration and creation, and improved connectivity of biodiversity corridors to tackle pressures on species..." 2/8
"including pollution, unsustainable use of resources & climate change, with targeted action to recover specific species." There is no mention of maintaining priority habitat at all. Priority Habitat only gets 3 mentions in the 262 pages of the Environmental Improvement Plan 3/8
The top priority to help species must be protecting their existing habitat, which by definition will be almost entirely Priority Habitat (S.41 NERC). Everything else comes after that. Yet this top priority gets no mention in the Coffey letter, and scant mention in the EIP 4/8
We know SSSIs are the main resource of Priority Habitat in England, although for some PH, a lot of the resource sits outside that network (Lowland Meadows for example). We also know that the Govt cut back monitoring of SSSI condition from 2010 so we're now flying blind. 5/8
We also know the main mechanism for protecting PH outside SSSIs - Countryside Stewardship, has been not been taken up by farmers anywhere near enough to ensure PH outside SSSIs is being well managed. Not that we would know anyway as there's no national monitoring scheme. 6/8
We don't even know where all the PH is, and we've been waiting for a proper National Grassland Inventory to record priority grasslands for 15 years. But in some ways that's all irrelevant now, because the Govt has told us their priorities are "habitat restoration & creation" 7/8
After all, it's much easier to measure habitat created, through agri-environment or BNG. Habitat restoration is trickier because when do you know a habitat has been restored? Easy enough though to make up metrics that can be reported on without worrying about actual outcomes. 8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Miles King

Miles King Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MilesKing10

Aug 31
After the reverse ferret by the RSPB over their response to the Government's slashing of the #nutrientneutrality rules, there's a view that it's unacceptable to accuse individual ministers of lying, presumably because these decisions are collegiate. What's been going on? 1/8
This isn't a one-off attack on charities for speaking out. The 2010 Tory Govt came in with plans to curtail criticism of the Govt by its own independent advisers. Practically the 1st thing the Farming Minister did on arrival at Defra that year was to muzzle Natural England. 2/8
After several years of threats, in 2013 the Cameron Govt introduced the Lobbying Act which restricted what Charities could say in public, and especially in the run up to an election. The intention was to have a "chilling effect" on charities. 3/8smk.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
Read 8 tweets
Mar 20
A short thread about Dartmoor and Natural England. NE is responsible for sites protected by law both at the national and international level. Not only does this mean stopping them from being damaged, but also ensuring that they are managed in such a way 1/14
that the species & habitats for which they are protected, survive and ideally thrive. Large parts of Dartmoor are protected as Sites of Special Scientific Interest, and as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) under the EU Habitats Directive. We may no longer be in the EU but 2/14
The Habitats Directive still applies, through the domestic regulations that transposed it. These are currently under threat from the REUL Bill, but for now still apply. And even if they're axed, the international importance of Dartmoor's species & habitats won't go away. 3/14
Read 14 tweets
Dec 19, 2022
A short thread about just one of the impacts of intensive Dairy Farming - yes it's Slurry Monday! With the ground frozen for over a week, all that Slurry is building up, because it can't be spread on fields. But with the thaw & rain, it's Slurry Spreading Time. 1/5
The smell - a pungent/nauseating mix of cow faeces and disinfectant, hangs in the air everywhere. Roads and fields are covered in sh*t, but with the ground still frozen in many places, it sloshes straight off fields, into ditches, streams and rivers 2/5
field gates show where slurry tankers have entered fields, but the slurry doesn't stay in the fields. It comes back out of the gates, onto the roads, into roadside ditches. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Nov 22, 2022
So Starmer wants low wage (though skilled) jobs eg in the food sector (usually done by migrants) to be done by UK nationals. 2 things follow. 1stly wages would have to increase dramatically to entice Brits. 2ndly, we're all going to be paying a lot more for our food. thread 1/12
I'm sympathetic to the idea that everyone pays for the real cost of food production, including better pay & paying for food to be produced sustainably. It costs more to produce food with lower environmental footprints, or rather, intensively produced food hides it true costs 2/12
Training up a new workforce to work in sustainable food production takes time, and also would need a whole raft of policy changes. At the moment most support goes to the biggest food producers, while the micro production level gets very little. That would need to reverse. 3/12
Read 13 tweets
Sep 28, 2022
Who'd have thought radically altering the way that farmers are supported by the taxpayer to produce food, & at least in theory all the other "goods" that land provides society, would take more than a few tweaks and a couple of years. Farmers are not happy with ELMS... thread 1/15
And neither is the nature sector. This is partly because it's only addressing part of the problem. Paying farmers a per ha payment is relatively simple. It's also deeply inequitous, because most of the £ goes to the biggest landowners. But it meant that farmers could get by. 2/15
taking away the area payment, let's call it a welfare payment, means that a lot of farms will not be able to make ends meet. This is because we have a very dysfunctional food economy in the UK. Most of the "profit" in the system doesn't go to farmers, except the biggest ones 3/15
Read 15 tweets
Sep 24, 2022
Government poised to scrap ELMS theguardian.com/environment/20… There's much more to this story. Mark Spencer, who was Johnson's chief whip, but supported Sunak in the leadership contest, was demoted to the post of Farming Minister at Defra on the 8th September. Shortish thread 1/12
Spencer is a farmer and also chaired the national federation of Young Farmers Clubs. It's the equivalent of being President of the Young Conservatives. It's a key role for anyone ambitious about becoming a key farming industry person. We know he's close to the NFU. 2/12
Because he was publicly praised by former Chancellor Sunak for lobbying hard on behalf of the NFU, to successfully protect the £1Bn/year worth of Red Diesel subsidy, most of which goes to big farmers - the NFU membership. Here's a thread I wrote about it in March 2021. 3/12
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(