Fred Stevens-Smith Profile picture
Oct 30 14 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
We turned off our self-serve signups and replaced our freemium plan with a $200 per month floor and it has generated... a reaction.

A thread with some thoughts on why we did this and what the impact has been so far to our business
First off, some context. Our active customer base was composed of the following before the change:
- ~200 freemium customers not paying anything
- ~200 freemium customers paying something (~$200 ARPU)
- 36 contract customers with low 5-figure ACVs
This was the result of trying PLG.

Our goal with PLG was to widen the top of funnel so that price wouldn't be an obstacle to trying the product;

the theory goes that great customers can start from anywhere, and that, especially for developer tools, trialers are put off by $
This is actually not about going up or downmarket, as this popular thread assumes.

Our ideal customer profile has remained identical throughout

we found that, for our product (QA, selling to devs), the premise of PLG *did not work*

specifically, very few users grew through the free -> small paid -> large paid motion

Most users that were paying 4 figures per month on self serve engaged heavily with us and ramped quickly
These customers wanted to speak with our team and wanted a company they could rely on and as such, wanted to pay something material

The free users, by and large, were looking for something free. That was the main goal and their primary evaluation criteria
For us these free users were a significant drain on the business. This chap nails why

And these free users were largely identical, firmographically, to the customers that happily paid us $1000 per month. Customer A and B have similar size, industry, headcount.

The only difference? Customer A pays us $3000 per year and Customer B pays us $0 per year.
We got similar feedback from both customer types, and if anything, more support load from the free users.

So freemium PLG did not work for us -- it self-selected for customers that cared more about cost than value.
We turned off self-serve largely to get closer to our customers, so that we can talk to them and qualify them before we invest in them.

Self-serve, especially with devs who don't really want to talk to you, is really hard when you live and die from feedback
The upside of a wider top of funnel did not outweigh this downside for us.
We have lost some of our free and low-paying customers. Obviously we don't want to hurt anyones business and that sucks. I would love if this model worked for our business and we could continue supporting folks like Ryan
But the impact has actually been fantastic. Some highlights:
- ~$1m of sales pipeline generated in 3 weeks, ~$100k already closed
- ~10% of the free customers converted to paid
- ~50% of the paying customers converted to the new pricing model
more importantly, perhaps, we now have a daily drumbeat of conversations with potential customers where we can test messaging, positioning, and pricing

the exceptionally slow feedback loop of PLG is probably the biggest hidden cost

write code, talk to users

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Fred Stevens-Smith

Fred Stevens-Smith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fredsters_s

Jan 23, 2020
Some thoughts for founders on choosing, pitching and working with VCs — a thread
Why am I credible? I have raised $41mm from some fantastic investors, have pitched an order of magnitude more than have ever said yes, and have learned a few things in my nearly 8 years as CEO of a venture-backed startup. That said, this is all opinion and there are no rules.
Intros: VC-VC intros are less than useless. They are usually negative signal.

In order of signal:
1) portfolio CEO intro
2) VC-VC intro when they’ve done many deals together
3) cold email
4) standard VC-VC intro
...
9999) associate meeting
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(