What explains this amorphous leftish coalition? It's not random - a particular ideological understanding of the world unites these issues. THREAD
These seemingly different interest groups are held together by Woke Identitarian ideology, which has a grand unifying theory of oppression called "Intersectionality". Here's an explainer montage I cobbled together from different NGO resources. 2/n
Like many words in the Internet era, the term "ideology" has gotten flabby. It’s commonly used to describe any collection of political ideas at all but this bloated definition deprives us of an important tool for pointing out a particularly destructive form of thinking. 3/n
In its narrow sense, an ideology is a set of political stories a group of people tell to facilitate mass action. They're quasi-religious oversimplifications of reality that possess dogmatic believers to interpret themselves & the world around them through a fixed schema. 4/n
In his book Alien Powers, Kenneth Minogue studied a range of different ideologies in an attempt to identify their consistent features. He saw them as part philosophy, part science, & part spiritual revelation that offers believers a sense of purpose in overcoming oppression. 5/n
He found similar patterns of ideological thought in Communism, Nazism, certain feminisms, & even strains of libertarianism. They all proposed that people were governed by hidden systems of oppression, they just had different ideas about who the oppressors were. 6/n
Each ideology studied a particular class of people & claimed they were living in a false consciousness that served the interests of another class. The task of the ideologue was to liberate the oppressed population by educating them about the yet-to-be-seen tyranny. 7/n
Minogue called these educators 'Custodians of Ideological Consciousness' & they're an unmistakable feature of the Woke movement, which found its early success in developing teaching methods & adapting educational institutions to their consciousness-raising effort. @SRCHicks 8/n
The term “Woke” itself was coined by its true believers and it refers to the feeling of awakening from false consciousness to see the hidden systems of oppression they believe govern the world. 9/n
What differentiates Woke Identitarian ideology from its predecessors is the fluidity of its oppressed class. They have tenaciously adapted the core doctrines of "systemic oppression" to many different identity groups. 10/n
Ideologies of the past worked on behalf of a single, cumbersome block of people - the workers (communism), the Aryan race (Nazism), the female sex (radical feminism), but Woke equips many classes with sub ideologies & unifies them with Intersectionality. 11/n
Anywhere a social grievance can be found, an academic franchise can be built using core "systemic" doctrines - Black people are oppressed by whites through systemic racism, women by men under systemic sexism, gays by straights under heteronormativity... 12/n
... trans people by gender conformists under cisnormativity, disabled by the abled under ableism, fats by thins under thin privilege, all the way down to left-handers being oppressed under the brutal reign of right supremacy. 13/n
One consistent feature of ideology that Kenneth Minogue identified, was that they claim the social order they seek to depose is itself an ideology. Take this description of Cisgenderism for example, where "cisgender" just means someone who isn’t trans. 14/n
They claim those who are comfortable with their biological sex, & value their normative identity more than trans identities, which is most people, have been inculcated into a systemic ideology. The only way to escape this ideology is to adopt Woke ideology & work on its behalf. 15/n
Each "system of inequality" can be loosely described as normal patterns of behaviour & thought. They trace all social inequality to the fact that most people do similar things & there are expectations, laws, & institutional practices built around this reality. 16/n
The bell curves of social behaviour are seen to inherently oppress the outliers, & "equity" is the social engineering enterprise of flattening out norms so that new ways of living can be discovered & practised unencumbered by the oppressive gaze of cultural values. 17/n
So then, who is in the grip of an ideology and who is in touch with reality? 18/n
I’ve come to realise the foil for Woke ideology is a simplistic reduction of our Western cultural heritage. Through relentless ideological critique, they’ve managed to reduce our diverse legacy of customs, beliefs, political procedures, & ethics to a “systemic ideology”. 19/n
A civilisation is neither a system nor an ideology. It’s an evolved ecology of meaning & practice that can’t be dismantled & rearranged at will to produce desired outcomes. This reductive, mechanistic conception of culture is Woke’s biggest tell. 20/n
Underneath all the hypnotic academic jargon lies the same simplistic model, repeated again & again - Cultural norms are "systems" that produce disparate outcomes & we need to reengineer our "system" to produce more equity. 20/n
This is "discourse engineering," a large and growing industry that's sustained by left-wing philanthropy, government research projects, and grants. It's about circumventing discussion and debate (democracy) to align public opinion with elite policy consensus. 🧵
If you take it for granted that this work is committed to combatting false claims, everything appears above board. But the devil is in the details - look closely, and you’ll reliably find evidence that they’re developing tools to engineer opinion. 2/n
If you try to speak frankly with a discourse engineer, it often feels like they’re not fully aware of the implications of their work. I was seated next to a disinformation expert on a flight from LA to Melbourne - she was returning from a symposium at Stanford. She struck me as well-meaning, genuinely trying to solve real problems, but so deeply embedded in her institutional culture that she could no longer distinguish facts from received opinion. At one point she said, “We just have to decide what kind of society we want to live in and curate information around that.” She had no idea she’d just unravelled the entire premise of liberal democracy. 3/n
Many of his fans wouldn't know that the famous intellectual Noam Chomsky was responsible for casting doubt on the first reports of the Khmer Rouge atrocities. He didn't deny the killings outright - but his scepticism muddied the waters at a critical moment. 🧵
2/ In 1977, Chomsky co-wrote Distortions at Fourth Hand in The Nation, accusing Western media of a "vast propaganda campaign" against the Khmer Rouge. He questioned refugee testimony, claiming it was exaggerated or fabricated.
3/ He favourably cited Cambodia: Starvation and Revolution by Hildebrand & Porter - a book that repeated Khmer Rouge PR spin & downplayed the violence as a postwar necessity.
The "Woke Right" (WR) is gaining traction as a pejorative term for an emerging right-wing political movement. I'm not fond of it and will explain why in this thread. Let's start with what’s being called "The Woke Right." 🧵
2/ WR, also called the New Right, Dissident Right, or Postliberal Right (a term I prefer), is tough to define. It’s an evolving intellectual/political movement made up of many influencers with conflicting, often clashing ideas.
3/ It's helpful to think of an emergent intellectual movement as a stew of ideas, where individual ingredients break down, change, and come together over time to form a more cohesive and identifiable dish.
Australian Olympic breakdancer Rachael Gunn has a PhD in breakdancing and dance culture. “All my moves are original,” she told reporters after her performance.
It turns out Gunn is a grievance studies scholar. One of her research papers about break dancing becoming an Olympic Sport.
This is too much. In another one of Gunn’s papers she deconstructs breakdancing culture to challenge the fact she doesn’t practice very much & questions why she’s excluded from the art-form’s hierarchy of respect.
A university is defined by what it deems most important, & this can be seen in what it is researching & teaching. It can evolve drastically over time as when modern secular colleges emerged from religious institutions. I posit something new has emerged in recent history. THREAD.
2. In 2016, a brilliant social psychologist by the name of @JonHaidt described what he saw as a schism forming within the university system. He claimed that US colleges were caught between two irreconcilable missions, truth & change, & referenced quotes to exemplify each outlook.
3. The first was from John Stuart Mill, which reflects a liberal arts perspective. Embedded in this spirit of curious humility is a belief that objective reality exists & is accessible to all inquiring minds as long as they're willing & able to overcome their subjective biases.
New Left identitarians, like Claudine Gay, discovered they could mimic forms of expertise as a means to power for their DEI activism. Her academic work is representative of a vast body of laundered research & credentials that prop up the entire DEI edifice. 1/n
In an audacious hoax project, @peterboghossian, @HPluckrose, & @ConceptualJames submitted ludicrous research papers to highly esteemed journals in DEI-related fields to expose the activist racket. 7 absurd papers were published, most in top-tier journals. 2/n
Up until now, laundering poorly researched ideology through peer review to secure legitimacy among elites had a cultural forcefield around it. Activist scholars & their students would level relentless ad hominem attacks & accusations of "isms" at anyone who questioned their legitimacy. The forcefield seems to be semi-permeable now. 3/n