This was Martin Luther King Jr's daughter Bernice King's statement to Amy Schumer after Schumer posted clips of MLK Jr. talking about Israel and antisemitism.
Russell Brand’s “mainstream media bias” angle is the opposite of what the allegations against him suggest — that mainstream media, which he was enormously successful in, was an enabler in the behavior described by at least five women. thetimes.co.uk/article/russel…
During Brand’s early years on Channel 4, staff alleged Brand asked them to find young female audiences members for him to meet after filming. They allege concerns about this practice were dismissed with “Boys will be boys” rhetoric.
Two former personal assistants who worked for Brand during his mainstream media success said his managers sought them out specifically because they were gay or Brand’s mother’s age — in part because Brand walked around in his underwear or with no underwear.
Three reporters and outlets, years of reporting, and hundreds of sources went into this Russell Brand investigation — one woman alleged he had a 3-month relationship with her when she was 16 and displayed increasingly abusive behavior. thetimes.co.uk/article/russel…
The woman said when she was 16 a taxi driver begged her not to go into Brand’s house after learning her age. The woman said Brand had her change his name to a woman’s name in her phone to deceive her parents. She said he sexually assaulted her.
The woman said Brand also kissed her mother without consent after her mother dropped her off, leaving her mother “very upset” and pleading for her daughter to come home. The woman hopes the age of consent law can be changed from 16 to 18
“I could never be convinced to join a cult” and “I can spot a manipulator a mile away” and “I could never be abused” are all variations of the same wrong sentiment. Your false belief that you are above manipulation and abuse stems from victim-blaming culture.
Part of the reason this sentiment irks me so much it that it’s based around the fallacy that life is predictive. Even the most psychologically well-adjusted and skeptical person is suspectible to life-altering events and changes that could leave them vulnerable to abuse.
The idea that only stupid, careless, and naive people are abused or recruited into cults or manipulated relies on myths about victimization. Even if you are not vulnerable right now, you were as a child, you will be as an elder, and everything can change in an instant.
A lot of people are defending their in-theater phone use by saying they get bored during long movies. I get that. But here's the thing — boredom is a part of life. Movie theaters are shared spaces. You aren't entitled to distract other people from the art because you're bored.
There's a huge reluctance to be bored, which is staggering in this discussion, because in a movie theater you are constantly being entertained. Just because the entertainment isn't endlessly high-energy doesn't mean you can get on your phone.
You should be bored sometimes! You should be left to nothing but your own thoughts and feelings sometimes! And in movie theaters, even having your phone on "low brightness" is visible to other people. I used to work in a movie theater. It is very obvious to everyone.
Many of our modern woes seem like an extension of bad human behavior, but I’d argue (and research backs me up) that the toxicity on internet spaces is a direct result of bad platform design. These spaces are made by humans, they can be changed by humans. We are not powerless
One of the biggest reasons platforms refuse to take accountability (and shift the burden of bad behaviors onto individuals and victims) is because they make money off the human despair on their platforms. They could change it but they would lose profit. They won’t do that
It would require a lot of work, but Goodreads could make it so that you have to be verified or authorized by authors/publishers to review an unreleased book, instead of relying on the honor system which literally *always* fails in online settings. This is not a people problem
Five days ago, Jonathan Majors’ lawyer asked for his domestic violence misdemeanor charges to be dropped. Although other mens’ DV charges were dropped in court that day, Majors’ weren’t, and a trial was set. And yet, the news has been misconstrued & weaponized against DV victims.
First, this is an AP article about the court appearance. The AP isn’t perfect, but it’s a wire service, so it’s ideally the most neutral, bare bones reporting out there. apnews.com/article/jonath…
In traditional media coverage, the most neutral reporting illustrates ways in which the court system works against DV victims. The more skewed reporting tends to focus on extraneous details that distract from the allegations against Majors or position him as the wronged party.