a question i've often been asked over the last two years is: what's the most surprising part of having a kid?
normally my answer has been something about the parent child bond
however, now my answer is different. here's something i wish someone had told me beforehand, tbh
...
one of my favorite shows is king of the hill.
one distinction i'd make between something like king of the hill and the simpsons is that, eventually, i started to identify with hank. i never "became" homer while watching the simpsons. i became an adult, but that never happened.
but eventually, as i got older, i guess you could say i started to see the plots and episodes from hank's perspective, rather than the kids. it just made sense. we're not that similar, but - that switch happened. i wasn't "the kids" anymore. i was seeing the adults as the equals
well, if the adults are your equals, that means you're seeing the kids as kids. you're seeing their limitations and limited perspective as one of their main character features. those things define what kids are, really. and most importantly, they're not totally aware of them.
i've mentioned this before, but by definition, a kid sees things from a kid's perspective. he literally has to. and that limitation is self referential. its total. he cannot know what it means entirely, even if he is aware of it. that's "the whole game". its a closed limit.
i promised myself i'd never give parenting advice online, so, this isn't that. in fact is has nothing to do with the kid at all.
the most unexpected part of having a kid has been experiencing that flip in my own life story, with my own childhood - and, being forced to do that.
having a kid means a few things. you're literally looking at the kid a lot. it kind of looks like you. and you're going through all these childhood processes with it, while also planning and reflecting on how your relationship will be to the kid.
okay, thats very very obvious.
what i did not expect, and what totally blindsided me, was the implications of this. heres a tangible one that i think will resonate with some people.
you're a guy (sorry, idk what it's like to be a girl, maybe its similar). you're here so, you probably have weird interests.
so, for your whole early life, its quite possible no one ever really asked you about these weird interests. and you were a kid, so you thought, well, yeah this makes sense. im into [this weird thing], other people arent, so they dont ask me about it.
that makes sense
to a kid.
but when YOU have a kid, you realize: wait. whatever this kid was into, i would obviously ask him about it.
in fact, i'd be into it because he's my kid. i would be genuinely curious because i care about him.
if owen jr got into accounting, i would find accounting interesting.
if he was reading books about accounting a lot, and watching videos about accounting, and wearing "accountant" t shirts, obviously id ask him about it. id probably take him to accounting things. i mean, that would be like, front and center in my mind.
okay. so, obvious question
why didnt the adults in your life, when you were a kid, feel that way about you?
i mean no one asked you about any of that stuff. why not?
its kind of uncomfortable answering a question like that. theres really only a few folders to land in. none of them are great.
if that example doesn't resonate with you, theres 1000 others. you remember some time when you were a kid and XYZ happened. and you remember how the adults around you acted.
but now YOU are the one with a kid. and you would never act that way. so, why did they?
uncomfortable.
to be totally honest, for the last two years, its like that. ill remember something from when i was a kid, and my perspective on it is totally flipped. not trivial things. like, totally rewriting the story
i did not seek this out. it just happens.
its really, really annoying.
i never believed in psychology stuff, to be totally honest, but now i do think theres something to the framework of: you inherent this meta narrative from your childhood, and then carry it into adulthood.
what do you do about it? not sure.
but heres something positive. a twist
so, everyone has unideal stuff from their childhood. not to therapy out, but, thats true (imo).
im slowly coming to the conclusion that, even without this self awareness about it: having a kid is the redemption arc from your own childhood.
lets take a random example. this one didn't happen to me: divorce. you're a kid, and your parents get divorced. or, they did drugs a lot (like mine).
so, what do you do with that? its hard to come up with a great answer here. you get over it i guess. alright. thats something.
but theres really no flash or narrative there. alright. you get over it. thats not really a redemption arc.
one solid answer for what a redemption arc COULD look like is: you have your own kid. you create a new smaller version of yourself, and then you don't do that to them.
im sure thats not the only answer, but, its at least a pretty good answer. you (literally) see this new smaller version of yourself, and you get the satisfaction of seeing them get to go through life not getting bitten by the same animal you did
and, its real. it really happens
this brings an interesting spin to the popular topic of people not having kids. if we carve out an exception for something like a religious celibate life, its hard to imagine some of my close friends really getting the full redemption arc from their childhood without this.
so, that's my real answer. what's the most unexpected part of having a child? that you rewrite your own childhood story over again. you just keep turning over these stones and you're like:
woah, i had no idea that was there.
and no one ever told me that so, im telling you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
hungry ghosts are a type of ghost you may read about in tibetan buddhism, although they are found in other cultures - over into east asia and down into southeast asia. i can also attest that you can find them in parts of north america.
…
some of these images are lower quality than i generally allow. i hope thats alright. as i deeply enjoy this topic i pulled a lot of them from a niche archive myself on my phone via screenshots. there are a few images that really capture the vibe that i needed here, such as this:
this is really the main image for me. you can see its blurry. kind of fits the cryptid vibe - but i like when theyre depicted this way: with long thin necks and huge stomachs. in some texts youll read they have pencil thin necks that are a mile long, then a stadium sized stomach
my halloween film of choice is a movie called 'hell house', a documentary that follows a charismatic evangelical church that puts on a hell themed haunted house, to show local teenagers the horror of hell and damnation, live, with actors
the church this film follows is, at least slightly, pentecostal - meaning they do the whole "speaking in tongues" thing full on
it has, ostensibly, nothing to do with the haunted house, but in the film, a man being interviewed says something noteworthy about speaking in tongues
he says part of the sacred nature of it is that it's a language you don't use in everyday life. its a form of speaking that is totally removed from things like joking around with friends, or writing a grocery list, or getting into an argument with someone.
"can you see an apple in your mind?" and "do you have an inner monologue?" are the two case studies that dominate internet "how do we think?" discussions.
as someone interested in cognition, i'd like to give two other maddening examples and questions i've stumbled upon.
i quickly found that asking people open ended questions was not useful for this. to avoid spending too much time going over what basic words mean in terms of cognition (an hour long discussion about what "seeing" means), i find its better to use real examples and work backwards.
1. is a soliloquy metaphorical?
this one still gets me if i think about it too much.
you are probably familiar with the concept of a soliloquy, where a character steps aside and speaks to the audience, and this, obviously, conveys what they are thinking in an external way.
today the LDS church (primary mormon organization) has something called general conference - a large meeting / broadcast that takes place every 6 months.
i'd like to briefly go into one of my all time favorite sociological observations ever. this is a really good one.
theres a guy named bruce charlton. i think this is a photo of him. he's not very online.
he is not LDS. i believe he started looking into mormonism as someone researching the fertility of various population groups, and then found it interesting beyond that - but didnt convert.
at least, his writing made it clear he wasn't part of the church, when i read it. im not going to dig into his life further than that.
he wrote a series of posts that generally follow the theme of 'hey, this is kind of interesting, what can we learn from looking at mormonism?'
in the mid 1800s the shakers (no sex having american fringe christians) started having so many visions they called it the ‘era of manifestations’
some people started drawing them, which was wild and extravagant by their normally humble standards
theyre called the gift drawings:
some of the aesthetic is pretty unique.
this one is called:
A Sacred Sheet Sent from Holy Mother Wisdom by Her Angel of Many Signs (1843)
i became of aware of these years ago. i knew an artist who told me about them - but he had the wrong name and misremembered the story, so i didnt find them until around a decade later
cant find a large version of this one but you can see the aesthetic. very ‘mystical americana’:
drank too much coffee at like 3pm today so heres a story that changed my life that i dont think i really told anyone.
youre me. its a few years ago.
you just drove three days to be in a mountain city with your wife, for her birthday.
its not going to go the way you planned.
i became christian a few years before this. since then i have invested the maximum amount of time a person could reasonably be expected to into figuring that out. piles of books every day. talks while walking my dog, doing chores, figuring out what church to go to, all of it.
one day i literally sat in my car for like ten hours and listened to these talks about the old testament all the way through. that was just a random day. so, im the maximum level of invested in understanding things and have cobbled some basic understanding together.