Douglas Farrar Profile picture
Nov 2 15 tweets 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
🧵Thanks to FTC staff, previously redacted info on why Amazon is an illegal monopolist is now out! Here’s some of what’s new in a big thread 👇🏻 1/15
Amazon pursues a pay-to-play scheme forcing sellers to buy ads. Worse, many of these ads are junk ads that aren’t relevant to what users search for. Jeff Bezos and co. call these Junk Ads “defects,” and sellers pay big bucks for them. 2/15 Image
These ads do two things. First, they make the customer experience much worse, which is why you might search for “water bottles” and end up with offers to buy “buck urine” 🤢 3/15 Image
They know this harms consumers, but they don’t care because maximizing advertising profit at all costs “has effectively become ‘law’ even if it has many flaws” according to a senior Amazon executive 4/15 Image
The second thing all of Amazon’s ads do is raise prices for consumers. Sellers are forking over big money in a pay-to-play scheme. That cost goes directly to you according to Amazon’ own executives. 5/15 Image
Amazon’s own economists even pointed out that by flooding search results with paid ads, Amazon steers shoppers towards higher-priced products and makes comparison shopping harder on the platform 6/15 Image
By the way, you as you can see above Amazon is still trying to keep some of the material in the complaint out of the public eye... 7/15
Amazon is really excited about how much money these ads are earning them by the way. In their Q3 report last week they said that revenue from ads grew 25%, which is faster than AWS 8/15

axios.com/2023/04/28/ama…
Amazon harmed price competition in other ways too. Former Amazon exec Jeff Wilke came up with the idea for an algorithm to avoid a “perfectly competitive market” where Amazon’s rivals lower their prices! 9/15 Image
Those foolish enough to compete with Amazon by lowering prices met the full force of Amazon's monopoly power. Take Jet dot com, which tried to compete by lowering seller fees. 10/15 Image
Amazon also harms competition and extracts monopoly rents from sellers by requiring them to use Fulfilled By Amazon to have Prime eligibility. They once launched a program called Seller Fulfilled Prime which was a huge hit 11/15 Image
Amazon shut SFP down because they said deliveries weren’t on time. But new info today shows sellers using SFP met the delivery requirement set up by Amazon more than 95% of the time. 12/15 Image
This freaked Amazon out. One Amazon exec said splitting Prime eligibility from FBA was an “oh crap” moment. 13/15 Image
Another one said a growing third-party logistics marketplace “keeps me up at night” 14/15 Image
There is plenty more I didn’t cover. And you can view all the newly unredacted material at the link below, thanks to the heroic work by the FTC attorneys working on this huge case. 15/15
ftc.gov/legal-library/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Douglas Farrar

Douglas Farrar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DouglasLFarrar

May 24
The WSJ Editorial Board has published 63(!) pieces about FTC Chair Lina Khan since June 2021. That’s one every 11 days.

But, why? A thread! 🧵(1/8)

economicliberties.us/the-wall-stree…
There are likely several reasons, but the one that sticks out is their fear of the growing bipartisan consensus on the need for robust antitrust enforcement. 2/8 Image
Enforcing antitrust laws is broadly popular because people are concerned that corporate consolidation is leading to censorship, consumer harms, and threats to market access and entrepreneurship. 3/8

today.yougov.com/topics/economy…
Read 8 tweets
Mar 8
Let’s clear up some misunderstandings about why the FTC would ask a company like Twitter for information under a “consent order” (and what a consent order even is!). 🧵 1/11
Consent orders are agreements between the FTC and companies that allow the Commission to collect information on matters covered in the orders, which often relate to what companies do with your data. 2/11

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_d…
In 2011, Twitter agreed to a 20-year consent order over its data security practices and how it uses your private information. 3/11
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(