Eli Tyre Profile picture
Nov 3 8 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
A piece of software that I really want: A way to save all the tabs and window _of a particular desktop_.

I can save all of the tabs of a window, with eg . And my browser can save ALL my open windows to open next time.

I want something in between.one-tab.com
I make heavy use of the OSX feature "desktops", which allows multiple separate workspaces in parelell.

I'll typically have a desktop for my logging and tracking, one for chats and coms, one with open blog posts, one with writing projects, one with an open coding project, etc.
Basically, all of these are separate contexts that I can switch between for doing different kind of work.

What I want to be able to do is save each of those contexts, and re-open them later.
I want to be able to click a button to close and save all the open windows (and all of their tabs) that on a particular desktop, and then click a button to reopen them all again.

And crucially, it doesn't close the windows in OTHER desktops.
Ideally, it would also save the relative size and location of all the windows, so that they open in the same places as where they were when I saved them.

But that's an extra benefit.
Ideally, it would work across applications: I can save browser windows, an open pdfs, open text editor files, etc. (Again, without closing other windows of that application on other desktops.)

But I would get 90+% of the value from just a tool for web browser windows.
Does some version of this exist?
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eli Tyre

Eli Tyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EpistemicHope

Nov 4
Important if true:

Chickens apparently pass the mirror-test if you adapt the mirror test to be better suited to chickens? Image
From the results, it at least appears that roosters can distinguish between their own mirror reflections and other roosters.

Roosters behave differently in the presence of a mirror from how they they behave in the presence of a conspecific.
On first pass, this isn't because they're using non-visual cues (eg smell) that their reflection doesn't have to recognize conspecifics.

They tried the experimental setup with a mirror and another rooster behind the mirror. This gave the same results as just the mirror.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 4
Is there a platform that allows me to publish two versions of a document, a public version and a private version, so that the two stay mirrored, except for some particular components that only show up on the private version?
Basically I want to be able to have some pages that I continually edit, which are mostly public, but include some private notes to myself. And I don't want to have to manually update two versions.
One example of how this could work is something like google docs, where the text is shared with anyone who has a link to it, but only people who have been given special access can see the comments.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 2
@gshaikovski @JanMBrauner @DavidSKrueger Man, I'm with you for most of this tweet, except for the word "baseless".

(Some) people have detailed arguments underlying their predictions.

It's true that all our predictions on this topic are going to be importantly speculative, but baseless is too strong.
@gshaikovski @JanMBrauner @DavidSKrueger For instance, we can extrapolate from scaling law data, and we can reason from analogy to biology, or make arguments based on rational agent models

Are those science? No! Not in the proper sense of "science".

But it's also not people making up random fancies.
@gshaikovski @JanMBrauner @DavidSKrueger That kind of argumentation is weak compared to empirical work. A lot of arguments in that class sound compelling, and but are then obviated in surprising ways by how reality actually turns out to be.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 28
One hopeful thing that fuels my uncalibrated excitement about is that the setup _might_ elegantly solve the core problem of starting a dating app:

What makes it worth it for women to join? manifold.love
Typically you don't need much incentive to get men to show up. The possibility of getting laid is usually enough.

But in order for the two sided market to work, you need women to show up too. What makes it worth it for women to switch to your product?
And at the moment, the app is dominated by men. The gender ratio is maybe 1-7?

But if the central conceit of matchmaking markets works, this might be self-correcting.
Read 21 tweets
Oct 28
is live!

I feel so excited about it.

Base rates suggest that it will turn out not to work, but I'm allowing myself to feel excited anyway.manifold.love
It feels like I'm looking at old OkC again.

A vibe of trying to help people find happiness.
(Instead the feeling of every dating app since OkC—a superficial veneer of enthusiasm on top of constant pressure to force me to play a game I don't want to play. The tech is out to get me, not to empower me or serve human needs.)
Read 7 tweets
Oct 22
There should be a kind of company that offers homeoweners the following deal:

* We knock down your house to build a classy multi-story brownstone in its place.
* We'll pay for that.
* You own and live in the bottom floors, just as you currently live in your house.
* We're going to rent out the newly built floors above you to new tenants.
* You get to take x% of the rental profit.
If this were common, it could double the the housing capacity of high-rent suburbs like Berkeley.

And because it compensates the homeowner, it incentivizes them to be YIMBY instead of NIMBY.

This seems like a win-win for everyone.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(