13-14th cc. - the Turkic State
14-16th cc. - the Circassian State
1517 - the Roman Conquest
Neither political realities, nor the political imagination of pre-modern polities had anything to do with an idea of nation state. Which was not even a thing before the French Revolution
Pre-history of pretty much any nation state is fictitious and largely made up. We describe very bizarre (from a modern standpoint) political orders and imaginations in a way they would make for a teleological nation state narrative
Purely political, nothing to do with reality
What is now "Turkey" was a Roman state
But what is now "Egypt" was a Turkic state
Fellahin had nothing to do with the state that ruled over Egypt. Just like "Turks" had nothing to do with the state that ruled over Anatolia
Village bumpkins, the state in no way represents them
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
75 years since the first partition, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not over. Based on the last four weeks , we can only expect it to escalate, resulting in more mutual dehumanisation, more reciprocal violence, more of the previously uninvolved joining it on either side 🧵
What kind of conflict it is?
Contrary to the popular opinion, this is not a war of religion. Religious or eschatological interpretations too often obfuscate the underlying reason of why it all happens
Territory
This is and has always been a territorial conflict
You will not understand dynamics of either the Arab-Jewish or Muslim-Jewish relations without realising the territorial nature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
(as no side ever will say it fights an unjust one)
Consequently, neither of our wars can have limits or boundaries. The Just War argument logically excludes a possibility of limiting the war-related violence
And vice versa, if we wage a total war of the unlimited violence, the enemy must be also total, absolute
That is a Nazi
Consequently, mass indiscriminate killing of civilians will be almost invariably justified with the WWII references & allusions
In the Russian Empire, Jews were not normally allowed to live east of the Pale of Settlement (red). While few privileged categories like rich merchants were allowed to settle in Russia proper, the absolute majority was locked to Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Lithuania
This however, applied only to the Western, Ashkenazi Jews
Bukhara Jews of modern Uzbekistan, Karaites of Crimea or foreign "Oriental" Jews were free from such limitations and could settle anywhere
Many Ashkenazi bought Ottoman passports specifically for this purpose
"My father was a Turkish subject and, therefore, I am a descendant of Janissaries. Who spared neither women, nor children, nor the underground millionaires"
has different meaning than it seems. It refers to the practice of buying the Ottoman passports for freedom of travel
There's more plants than herbivores, more herbivores than carnivores etc. The lower trophic levels weigh more. And "more" means few orders of magnitude more
Perhaps, we need to introduce an idea of a technology chain pyramid 🧵
Consumer goods would constitute the lowest trophic level. Which means, the largest level by far. There's just way more of them compared all the upper levels combined
This is also the only level of the technology chain visible to the general audience
"Everything produced in China" means "everything I buy is produced in China". And everything I buy means consumer goods
1. We see only the lowest trophic level of the technology chain 2. We notice it is dominated by the Chinese production 3. Voila, China produces everything
It is very important to understand that the market of machine components is significantly more concentrated than the market of machines. The latter tends to be dominated by small to medium producers. The formers tend to be monopolistic
There are very few suppliers
Target them
The American contempt to Europe is performative and exaggerated. If you are looking for the quality, military industry grade hardware, the European capacities and capabilities are absolutely unmatched
With the singular exception of Japan, no one in the world stands even close
"Western machinery is used to build Russian missiles" is not wrong. It's just lacks the context. And the context is:
Computerisation affected metalworking processes unevenly. Machining was so deeply revolutionised, that most of the Soviet conventional base became *useless*
It was absolutely necessary to replace the obsolete Soviet conventional equipment with the imported computerised machines. Starting from 2003, Putin replaced Soviet machines with the automated equipment from the U.S allies
That's how he revived the Russian military production
Forging and pressing were less affected by the implementation of digital control. Consequently, there was often no need to replace the existing equipment
In 2021, the ICBM producer Votkinsk still operated this screwdriver press built in 1915