THREAD. He has a point. Why would anyone whose own ethnic group isn't affected by it care about trying to stop the U.S. government from giving $14 billion to a far-right military whose leaked documents and public statements show that it intends a genocide and ethnic cleansing?
Yglesias continues to marvel. Aside from not understanding how social movements work or the concept of solidarity, he again reveals something I've pointed out before: people like him find out about activism on an issue and assume that the activism happens in isolation.
Yglesias sees as people protesting an imminent genocide and he assumes they "care 1000x more about" it than many other things. It's hard to fathom for him, but a lot of people spend their lives *fighting injustices that are related to each other.*
That's why many of the people at these protests were in the streets in 2020, tried to stop the Iraq war, have been protesting the rise of fascism and imminent genocide in India, have been trying to stop mass incarceration, have been fighting against the U.S. war machine,
Trying to stop the militarization of the U.S. border, putting their lives on the line to block pipelines that are destroying the future of the earth, desperately trying to get people to pay attention to what the U.S. is supporting in Yemen, throughout Africa, etc....
His words are revealing. This isn't a "humanitarian issue." It's not some kind of natural disaster. What Israel does--theft of land, lynch mobs, Apartheid where Palestinians have few basic rights, the murder of 1000s of children--can only happen b/c of U.S. weapons.
A similar thing happened when Yglesias and others attacked the racial justice movement in 2020. They accused people of not caring about the "safety" of Black people and poor people, though many people he was talking about spent their lives trying to build safer communities.
It's a tactic of deflection by people safe enough to tolerate the status quo. They say "why don't you care about other injustices?" People throughout history fight injustices connected by greed, profit, hatred, bigotry, and indifference by *connecting their struggles together.*
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD. We seeing an organized McCarthyist campaign unlike any in decades.
Across the U.S., people are losing jobs, being disciplined at schools, losing contracts, being cancelled for lectures, being threatened, etc. It's predicated on the fallacy that Jewish people and non-Jewish people who criticize the far-right Israeli government are “antisemitic.”
My grandparents dealt with antisemitism for their entire lives. Weaponizing "antisemitism" to insulate a monstrous anti-democratic government and fascist vigilante settler violence from measured criticism and application of basic international law cheapens the concept.
How many differences can you notice in how the New York Times talks about Israelis and Palestinians?
-Israeli claims are repeated as fact, Palestinian ones as assertions from biased authorities.
-Israelis "killing" Palestinians, Palestinians "murdered" Israelis "systemically and brutally"
-"women, children and old people" died in Israel, but only "Palestinians" die in Gaza.
These statements and omissions are more glaring given growing evidence that Israel killed many of its own soldiers and civilians. mondoweiss.net/2023/10/a-grow…
THREAD. I've been studying how U.S. police units fabricate manipulate body camera footage after killing someone. They know their lies will usually be uncovered, but here's the key a lot of journalists miss: the goal is to stop the virality of the story by creating confusion.
When stories of a police murder or a war crime go viral, the situation becomes unpredictable and can spiral quickly. Repressive government bureaucracies worry about unpredictable virality because they cannot carefully control narrative like they do with traditional media.
The difference between a story that goes viral and a story that doesn't can, in this case, be hundreds of millions of additional people learning important facts about the world that are systemically hidden from them, and from seeing images they may never have seen.
THREAD. The recent behavior of Gavin Newsom on the issue of homelessness is among the most alarming things I've seen from a Democratic Party politician in recent years. If you haven't been following, I collect four examples here.
First, he recently spoken openly about how he was so mad about federal judges protecting the constitutional rights of homeless people that he thought about doxing the personal contact information of judges so mobs of angry people could intimidate them:
Second, he is trying to get the right wing of the Supreme Court to overturn a bedrock constitutional principle in order to permit the government to put homeless people in cages for simply existing on the street *even when there is no shelter space.*
THREAD. Behind closed doors, a little-known bureaucrat in Los Angeles just signed one of the weirdest--and most dangerous--contracts I've seen in my career: it gives huge control over the “justice” system in Los Angeles to the consulting firm Accenture.
After years of hard work by community members, they won an inspiring political victory: they got the largest county in the U.S.--with the biggest, most profitable jail system--to transition to a safer system that prioritizes evidence and care instead of profit and incarceration.
Part of the background: last year, a court finally declared LA’s cash bail system unconstitutional: although it makes billions for the for-profit bail industry, it is unconstitutional to jail people solely because their families cannot pay a cash premium to a private company.
The evidence shows violence is related to big structural things--inequality, housing, education, healthcare, lack of connection, etc. Increases to prosecution, sentencing, police budgets don't do much about it short term. BUT: those things cause catastrophic lasting harm.
This is one of the most important things you can remember. Whenever you hear politicians droning on about "crime" and making various little tweaks and proposals: they are being ridiculous. It's all a charade designed to distract from their failure to improve material conditions.
A good recent example is @CMZParker5. Almost overnight, he's become a symbol of ineptitude and bad faith. The latter b/c people know he's too smart to believe what he said, and the former b/c his odd behavior reflects bad political instincts.