Trump should have business cards printed: Deceit, Trickery, and Dishonesty Social.
DOJ argues that Trump's bully pulpit means his was not just one voice among millions, as he himself bragged about -- but in any case, it's a matter for trial.
On the same day Trump is testifying about whether his fraud at Trump Org mattered, DOJ included this line in his DC case.
I hope someone with interns is keeping a running tally of how many times Haldeman gets cited in this case.
The Conspiracy to Defraud section is, unsurprisingly, heavy on fake electors. Here, Jeffrey Clark gets glancing mention.
Shorter DOJ: Sure. If you want us to ALSO charge you with false statements, we can do that too.
DOJ making good use of the pain sweat and tears that got them to Fischer.
Been waiting since at least August 2021 to see how DOJ would argue this.
And now making good use of the pain sweat and tears to get to Robertson.
Florence Pan in the house...
I feel like this was the subject of weeks of discussion. And Trump just teed it up for them.
The definition of corruptly for 1512 is still very much a work in progress (but, I've argued, all foreseeable definitions apply to Trump). Which is why this passage is written this way.
Really legalistic way of saying it's illegal (under the Klan Act) to steal other people's right to vote.
Interesting cake-eating-too move here, to address that some of Trump's actions were committed as President.
Lots of Cheap Dates have been making a 1A argument since this indictment. This is how DOJ dealt with it, unsurprisingly.
Honestly, I may develop a hobby of laughing at the way DOJ and legal commentators make fun of John Lauro for his misuse of citations.
Holy shit! Dead-Prigozhin's trolls even made it in here.
Get used to seeing this passage. Lauro is making a bid, in this and 2 other motions, for Alito and Thomas to treat this as right wing speech. This is how DOJ will address it over and over.
This goes to the core of every legal case against Trump.
Mackey, which will be appealed but bc Mackey is not a former President, may not get there first, gets a shout out.
This is where DOJ compares Trump's historical analogies, starting with 1800, begins, for the historians in the crowd.
Nice to start cataloging the people, like @MaryMargOlohan, who are stupid enough to take @SecRubio's false claims about what the EU fine is for seriously.
Thanks for making that clear!
Big Dick Toilet Salesman says he is stupid or a liar.
Unsurprising that Medicare fraudster @SenRickScott thinks fines for fraudulent consumer claims are censorship.
To add the confusion of the many ways Lindsey the Insurance Lawyer bolloxed her attempt to indict Jim Comey, there are actually THREE different documents.
First, what she purports is an indictment (but which was not presented to GJ in this form). Sig page looks like this.
The sig page for the doc originally docketed as the no-bill indictment looks like this (identical to what I just posted). Basically, Lindsey put the sig page from the purported indictment on the no-billed one.
Sometime later that day, someone FIXED that (the no-billed indictment) with a correct last page.
Let me try to explain how John Durham made you MAGAts all look like dumbasses.
By context, this email of 2 Russian spies talking about starting a Deep State conspiracy is July 26.
But this Russian spy report--the one you're all drooling over? Durham has, AFAIK, ALWAYS hidden the date of that. Always. 🤔 @ChuckGrassley is probably colluding with him to do so now.
But BY CONTENT, it can only have been written July 26 or later.
@ChuckGrassley Now, Durham concluded that the Bernardo emails were "compilations," which is a dodge word for "fabrication." But even if you believe the Bernardo emails are REAL, the one via which the Russian spies would have "learned" that Hillary "approved" a smear campaign was date July 27.
In a declaration filed this week, Trump's top DOGE at Treasury cited a GAO report from last year. Lots of people On Here are taking that $2.7T out of context. (And ignoring that poor Tom miscited some quotes in this paragraph, but we expect shoddy work from DOGE.)
But let's look at the GAO Report he relies on, shall we?
FIRST humiliating thing DOGE Tom didn't tell anyone is that MANY of these improper payments--the reason there was a recent spike--pertain to Trump's own COVID programs.