PizzadrenCrypto Profile picture
Nov 10 25 tweets 8 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
🧵Time for a #Cardano Partnerchain thread, some questions yet to be answered & why it may be beneficial for #Cardano long-term.
@CardanoSaint @gotMeAHaskell Image
1/ Thread includes
- How Minotaur works (ELI5 level)
- How a dual-token system works (e.g. VET & VTHO)
- How babel fees work
- Summary

Keep in mind that views are of my own, and all I've written here are my educated guesses based on what's published or available.
2/ Minotaur is basically a concept of combining multiple consensus models (PoW & PoS) into validating blocks on a blockchain.
E.g. you can have #Cardano & #Ergo work together by having $ADA contribute 90% staking power & $ERG contribute 10% hashing power to validate a block. Image
3/ In fact, since it's multi-resource, you can also throw in another blockchain with a different consensus (e.g. #Radix 's Cerberus) into the mix so you'll have 3 highly secure & robust consensus protocols validating this blockchain.
Link to paper: iohk.io/en/research/li…
Image
4/ While there's higher security guarantees for using multiple consensus protocols, the paper doesn't clearly state how the block rewards will be distributed to $ADA, $ERG & $XRD, since all 3 of them have different DLT designs & programming paradigms.
5/ Do all 3 blockchains with diff consensus shared a token reward for validating this multi-resource blockchain? Or do these blockchains still earn back their native tokens in $ADA, $ERG & $XRD for validating the blockchain?
6/ Answering these questions will be vital to explain how partnerchains from other ecosystems can use Minotaur to mutually benefit together.
For Midnight's case, Pi has an educated guess that there will be 3 diff consensus, but within IOG framework
7/ Speaking of block rewards, let's talk more about the tokens. It's been mentioned by Charles that there will be a dual token model, 1 unshielded as a CNT & 1 shielded and used as a fuel for the sidechain.
8/ The closest comparison that we can do a case study for a dual-token model is #VeChain & #NEO. Both blockchains have a native token in $VET & $NEO, with a corresponding gas token in $VTHO & $GAS.

neo.org/neogas#tokens
vechain.org
Image
9/ I'll cover only #VeChain for this thread since I had experience using it. The great thing about their dual-token models is you don't need to stake or delegate to receive these gas tokens, you just hold a certain amount of $VET or $NEO in your wallet and then
10/ it auto generates gas tokens inside your wallet. SS below shows how much $VTHO you're getting if you have 10k $VET in your wallet.

Paying SC execution fees with $VTHO is also extremely cheap (0.0xxx VTHO if I remembered correctly). Image
11/ Thus, you'll always have a huge surplus of $VTHO tokens that you can use their DEX called Vexchange & swap your $VTHO to $VET.


A dual-token model is beneficial to separate utility (tx & SC fees) & Store of Value (with governance).vexchange.io/swap
12/ Which brings back to IOG's proposal to implement dual-token model on the @MidnightNtwrk partnerchain. According to Eran Barak's interview, $DUST will be a shielded token, while an unshielded token is used to provide liquidity & security.
13/ For starters, using a dual-ledger (shielded & unshielded) actually make sense for businesses who wants to operate privately in certain scenarios while able to achieve a transparent regulatory compliance.
14/ Take for example a coffee shop that uses #Midnight blockchain to run their business.

Shielded ledger is useful to record micro-tx such as consumers buying coffee.

Unshielded ledger records a general overview of how many order are made in a day. Image
15/ As you don't need to tell the whole world you bought coffee, it's sensible for these types of tx to be in the shielded ledger, while regulators would wanna know how much coffee sales you made for tax purposes, so a reported no. of sales is suitable in an unshielded ledger.
16/ Back to the dual-token model, we at least have a fair understanding that $DUST will be used as a currency on the shielded ledger, but there's a lack of info on how the unshielded token works, the only info we got is that it's a CNT that prioritize liquidity & security.
17/ If we follow the #VeChain model, we can treat this CNT as $VET and generate $DUST for holding this CNT. From Charles tweet, there's a possibility that CNT has a fixed token supply while $DUST has unlimited supply with token burning, just like #VeChain
18/ Furthermore, there's mention of a $DUST airdrop for $ADA holders, but why not mention a CNT airdrop together with $DUST too? Unless if CNT = $ADA, at least it's what I half-understood from Charles' tweet here.
19/ Which brings to Babel fees.

For starters, highly recommend you rewatch the video about babel fees with limited liabilities. You'll understand how fees work in partnerchains after watching it.
20/ In summary, say 1 $ADA = 1 $DUST & assume 0.2 $DUST is the fee used to pay for the tx, a liability of -0.2 ADA is created, to which my guess is that @MidnightNtwrk SPOs will need to consume this liability to be able to complete the tx.
21/ I see two positive scenarios here:
- Midnight SPOs pay $ADA fee to consume the liability. +ADA fee revenue for other SPOs.
- Midnight SPOs get $DUST alongside $ADA rewards for securing the Cardano network. +ADA & DUST revenue for Midnight SPOs & delegators.
22/ So what does all of it mean? Well, I still see a lot of strong links between #Cardano & #Midnight. I think Minotaur will make a blockchain a 4th gen blockchain with it's novel multi-consensus techniques of providing security & robustness to a blockchain.
23/ How the dual-token model will work in detail for Midnight & other partnerchains still remain to be seen, but Babel fees definitely fits a better picture on how the fees in partnerchains will work that will also benefit the #Cardano SPOs.
24/ The questions left to be answered are:
- How token reward mechanisms work in a multi-resource blockchain setting where different blockchains want to join #Cardano as partnerchains?
- What's the detailed use case of the unshielded CNT token? and why not use $ADA = CNT?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with PizzadrenCrypto

PizzadrenCrypto Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pizzadren

Oct 24
🧵Time for an "unpopular opinion" thread. Why I'm still on the side of " $DUST token MAY not needed to power the Midnight sidechain".
#CardanoCommunity
@CardanoSaint
Image
1/ 1st, let me be clear that this is not a FUD thread. I support the idea of having a unique, privacy sidechain for a whole range of use cases. I just want to give an alternative POV on why $DUST token may not be necessary & hope you guys can take this as constructive feedback
2/ I'll break it down to:
- Pros of having the $DUST token
- Cons of having the $DUST token
- Alternatives & case studies.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(