I believe Covid is the first disease in recorded human history that humans have deliberately chosen to ‘live with’. Because that’s an empty slogan, it deliberately disguises two fundamentally different meanings. /1
We have of course had to ENDURE some diseases, because they’re hard to control, have no treatments, etc. Colds, flu, TB, cancer, malaria, heart disease etc. But we’ve constantly worked to control spread of those, and develop treatments and preventions. /2
That’s what ‘living with’ has historically meant. Enduring something, while trying to prevent, control and treat. But the ‘living with’ slogan for Covid means something fundamentally and historically different. It means to do nothing. Just infect, repeatedly. /3
It’s not a fight against the disease, it’s a fight against public health itself. Funded by the same vested interests who have been assaulting everything with ‘public’ in its name or with a public focus. It’s an assault upon the concept of the public itself. /4
And again, no matter how much these vested interests deny it, this is also an open, declared campaign. And has been for over 70 years. It’s right there, ‘personal responsibility’ to replace anything public. Never before has this lunacy extended to disease. But it does now. /5
I don’t think enough have registered yet that once you remove all of the infrastructure of society in this way, all that’s left that binds people together is slogans. We live in a sloganocracy. ‘Living with Covid’ sits on top of an ocean of slogans, we’re neck-deep in them. /6
That’s what social media is like, wading through the treacle of competing slogans. Slogans are the only interpersonal social life that is now permitted to exist. ‘Stop the Boats’. ‘When the sun doesn’t shine and wind doesn’t blow.’ Spend time listing them, it’s eye-opening. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Something remarkable is happening in Australia, which only Team Reality will notice. Team Populism will just be interested in which politician farted in parliament, or danced in a funny way. The energy grid is Shakespearean. Have a look at South Australia. /1
Everybody remembers the 2016 South Australia blackout. And how the LNP and its cheerleaders in the media tried to weaponise it as an anti-renewables message. We then endured years of praise of coal as providing 'cheap, reliable power'. Let's fast-forward 5 years, to 2021. /2
Reliability first. 'Load shedding' is when they forcibly shut down big users of electricity because of lack of supply. South Australia continued adding renewables at record pace after 2016. And what happened? It became the most reliable market in the country. See the zero? /3
A wonderful editorial. I’d add that public health thrives when elites feel threatened, and vice versa. But more than that, you can’t have public health without a public. The public was invented as an entity in the late-19th century. The past 7 years has destroyed it. /1
Societies area always just social. What destroyed it wasn’t capitalism or greed or corporations or money, all those grown-up bogeymen. It was the transformation of adult culture into adolescent high school culture. Through high schools as separate social spaces for children. /2
If you sever the social spaces of children from that of adults, when they leave school that’s the social space they will reproduce, in adulthood. It’s all they know. Social media dramatically accelerates this shift, which is why everything seems to be getting worse. /3
I’m not seeing any platform generating the power old Twitter had to help shape public debate. The minute it began to have an impact, the billionaire class bought it and shut it down. They invented social media to make money and promote libertarian politics. /1
No obstruction to either aim will be tolerated. These platforms feed off the social destruction they largely create, they monetise the millions living in fractured societies who flee here to try to regroup. I will always argue to turn social media off, entirely. /2
Because socially and culturally its model is an abomination . An exponential machine to corrode the basics of all civil society in history. It seems so warm and fuzzy, because it allows ordinary people to connect and share information. The con is seductive. /3
Listened to an excellent discussion about clean air chaired by @dom_ma and including @c_s_wallace. A key topic for discussion was how to de-individualise public health again, to get scale and traction on topics like clean air. I think the bad guys have already shown us how. /1
You tabloidise information (I may have invented a verb there). That's what tabloid media is. It's not just scaremongering and sensationalism, it's much, much more precise. It collapses the distinction between individual and collective. /2
You don't need a million messages to build a collective narrative. You need one tabloid message, to go viral. The whole purpose of tabloidism (might have invented a noun there too) as a genre is to *individualise collective issues*. That's why it works. /3
Haven’t paid a cent for electricity in over a year. (We’re making money.) The energy part of the ‘cost of living crisis’ doesn’t exist for us. We need to re-frame our social problems, to stop feeling like isolated individuals. It’s a con. /1
The idea that ‘democracy’ is millions of isolated individuals, who need to act together to create change, is a libertarian fantasy. But pretty much everybody believes it, and that’s why libertarians are winning. How powerless does it make you feel? Enormously. QED. /2
There’s no local, and no global. The ‘global’ problem of electricity costs was over for us in 2 days, by installing solar. We’re exporting more than half of it, powering 3-5 other homes, every day. Our ‘local’ action is having ‘global’ effects. The distinction is meaningless. /3
Societies of adolescents worship friendship. Here's why that's so dangerous, using Covid and climate change as examples. Friendship is a developmental social stage. Extending it to the centre of all adult life leads to social collapse. /1
Friendship is like L-plates and P-plates for the maturation into adult life. It absolutely dominates adolescent and early adult life, where we use friends to develop the social skills of beginning to live outside our families. Why the sitcom of the same name did so well. /2
And we all of course have friends, throughout our lives. But what's changed is the absolute centrality of that now to life at all ages. Men for example who retire are encouraged to join friendship groups, Men's Sheds and Men's Tables. /3